Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.7314/APJCP.2014.15.15.6053

Utility of Frozen Section Pathology with Endometrial Pre-Malignant Lesions  

Oz, Murat (Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Zekai Tahir Burak Women's Health Education and Research Hospital)
Ozgu, Emre (Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Zekai Tahir Burak Women's Health Education and Research Hospital)
Korkmaz, Elmas (Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Zekai Tahir Burak Women's Health Education and Research Hospital)
Bayramoglu, Hatice (Department of Pathology, Zekai Tahir Burak Women's Health Education and Research Hospital)
Erkaya, Salim (Department of Gynecology, Zekai Tahir Burak Women's Health Education and Research Hospital)
Gungor, Tayfun (Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Zekai Tahir Burak Women's Health Education and Research Hospital)
Publication Information
Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention / v.15, no.15, 2014 , pp. 6053-6057 More about this Journal
Abstract
Aim: To determine utility of the frozen section (FS) in the operative management of endometrial pre-malignant lesions. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed patients who underwent abdominal hysterectomy with preoperative diagnosis of complex atypical endometrial hyperplasia (CAEH) and simple endometrial hyperplasia (SEH) between May 2007 and December 2013. Frozen and paraffin section (PS) results were compared. Sensitivity, specificity, the positive predictive value (PPV), the negative predictive value (NPV) and the accuracy in predicting EC on FS were evaluated with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for each parameter. The correlation between FS and PS was calculated as an ${\kappa}$ coefficient. Results: Among 143 preoperatively diagnosed CAEH cases, 60 (42%) were malignant and 83 (58%) were benign in PS; and among 60 malignant cases diagnosed in PS, 43 (71%) were "malignant" in FS. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV for FS were 76%, 100%, 100% and 87.5%, respectively. Conclusions: We found that FS is reliable and applicable in the management of endometrial hyperplasias. It is important that the pathologist should be experienced because FS for endometrial pre-malignant lesions has significant inter-observer variability. The other conclusion is that patients with the diagnosis of EH, especially those who are postmenopausal, should undergo surgery where FS investigation is available.
Keywords
Endometrial hyperplasia; endometrial carcinoma; frozen section;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 4  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Acmaz G, Aksoy H, Albayrak E, et al (2014). Evaluation of endometrial precancerous lesions in postmenopausal obese women-a high risk group? Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 15, 195-8.   과학기술학회마을   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Armstrong, AJ, Hurd WW, Elguero S, Barker NM, Zanotti KM (2012). Diagnosis and management of endometrial hyperplasia. J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 19, 562-71.   DOI
3 Attard Montalto S, Coutts M, Devaja O, et al (2008). Accuracy of frozen section diagnosis at surgery in pre- malignant and malignant lesions of the endometrium. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol, 29, 435-40.
4 Balik G, Kagitci M, Ustuner I, Akpinar F, Guvendag Guven ES (2013). Which endometrial pathologies need intraoperative frozen sections? Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 14, 6121-5.   과학기술학회마을   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Bilgin T, Ozuysal S, Ozan H, Atakan T (2004). Coexisting endometrial cancer in patients with a preoperative diagnosis of atypical endometrial hyperplasia. J Obstet Gynaecol Res, 30, 205-9.   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Espindola D, Kennedy KA, Fischer EG (2007). Management of abnormal uterine bleeding and the pathology of endometrial hyperplasia. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am, 34, 717-37   DOI
7 Hahn HS, Chun YK, Kwon YI, et al (2010). Concurrent endometrial carcinoma following hysterectomy for atypical endometrial hyperplasia. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 150, 80-3.   DOI
8 Hunter JE, Tritz DE, Howell MG, et al (1994). The prognostic and therapeutic implications of cytologic atypia in patients with endometrial hyperplasia. Gynecol Oncol, 55, 66-71.   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Indermaur MD, Shoup B, Tebes S, Lancaster JM (2007). The accuracy of frozen pathology at time of hysterectomy in patients with complex atypical hyperplasia on preoperative biopsy. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 196, 40-2.   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Karlsson B, Granberg S, Wikland M, et al (1995). Transvaginal ultrasonography of the endometrium in women with postmenopausal bleeding-a Nordic multicenter study. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 172, 1488-94.   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Kumar S, Medeiros F, Dowdy SC, et al (2012). A prospective assessment of the reliability of frozen section to direct intraoperative decision making in endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol, 127, 525-31.   DOI
12 Kurman RJ, Kaminski PF, Norris HJ (1985). The behavior of endometrial hyperplasia. A long-term study of “untreated” hyperplasia in 170 patients. Cancer, 56, 403-12.   DOI
13 Mesci-Haftaci A, Yavuzcan C (2014). Endometrial curettage in abnormal uterine bleeding and efficacy of progestins for control in cases of hyperplasia. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 15, 3737-40.   과학기술학회마을   DOI
14 Kurman RJ, Norris HJ (1982). Evaluation of criteria for distinguishing atypical endometrial hyperplasia from welldifferentiated carcinoma. Cancer, 49, 2547-59.   DOI
15 Lacey JV Jr. and Chia VM (2009). Endometrial hyperplasia and the risk of progression to carcinoma. Maturitas, 63, 39-44.   DOI
16 Marsden DE and Hacker NF (2001). Optimal management of endometrial hyperplasia. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol, 15, 393-405.   DOI   ScienceOn
17 Montgomery BE, Daum GS, Dunton CJ (2004). Endometrial hyperplasia: a review. Obstet Gynecol Surv, 59, 368-78.   DOI   ScienceOn
18 Montz FJ, Bristow RE, Bovicelli A, Tomacruz R, Kurman RJ (2002). Intrauterine progesterone treatment of early endometrial cancer. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 186, 651-7.   DOI   ScienceOn
19 Morotti M, Menada MV, Moioli M, et al (2012). Frozen section pathology at time of hysterectomy accurately predicts endometrial cancer in patients with preoperative diagnosis of atypical endometrial hyperplasia. Gynecol Oncol, 125, 536-40.   DOI   ScienceOn
20 Pecorelli S (2009). Revised FIGO staging for carcinoma of the vulva, cervix, and endometrium. Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 105, 103-4.   DOI   ScienceOn
21 Pennant S, Manek S, Kehoe S (2008). Endometrial atypical hyperplasia and subsequent diagnosis of endometrial cancer: a retrospective audit and literature review. J Obstet Gynaecol, 28, 632-3.   DOI
22 Shutter J, Wright TC Jr (2005). Prevalence of underlying adenocarcinoma in women with atypical endometrial hyperplasia. Int J Gynecol Pathol, 24, 313-8.   DOI   ScienceOn
23 Randall TC, Kurman RJ (1997). Progestin treatment of atypical hyperplasia and well-differentiated carcinoma of the endometrium in women under age 40. Obstet Gynecol, 90, 434-40.   DOI   ScienceOn
24 Salman MC, Usubutun A, Dogan NU, Yuce K (2009). The accuracy of frozen section analysis at hysterectomy in patients with atypical endometrial hyperplasia. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol, 36, 31-4.
25 Sherman, ME, Ronnett BM, Ioffe OB, et al (2008). Reproducibility of biopsy diagnoses of endometrial hyperplasia: evidence supporting a simplified classification. Int J Gynecol Pathol, 27, 318-25.   DOI
26 Silverberg SG (2000). Problems in the differential diagnosis of endometrial hyperplasia and carcinoma. Mod Pathol, 13, 309-27.   DOI   ScienceOn
27 Skov, BG, Broholm H, Engel U, et al (1997). Comparison of the reproducibility of the WHO classifications of 1975 and 1994 of endometrial hyperplasia. Int J Gynecol Pathol, 16, 33-7.   DOI   ScienceOn
28 Trimble CL, Kauderer J, Zaino R, et al (2006). Concurrent endometrial carcinoma in women with a biopsy diagnosis of atypical endometrial hyperplasia: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Cancer, 106, 812-9.   DOI   ScienceOn
29 Turan T, Karadag B, Karabuk E, Tulunay G, et al (2012). Accuracy of frozen sections for intraoperative diagnosis of complex atypical endometrial hyperplasia. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 13, 1953-6.   과학기술학회마을   DOI   ScienceOn
30 Wang ZQ, Wang JL, Shen DH, Li XP, Wei LH (2013). Should all endometrioid uterine cancer patients undergo systemic lymphadenectomy? Eur J Surg Oncol, 39, 344-9.   DOI