Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.7314/APJCP.2014.15.14.5937

Effects of Student Perceptions of Social Skills on their Perception of Smoking  

Bektas, Murat (Department of Pediatric Nursing, Faculty of Nursing, Dokuz Eylul University)
Ozturk, Candan (Department of Nursing, Faculty of Health Science, Istanbul Sabahattin Zaim University)
Karatas, Hulya (Department of Pediatric Nursing, School of Health, Harran University)
Bektas, Ilknur (Department of Pediatric Nursing, Faculty of Nursing, Dokuz Eylul University)
Publication Information
Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention / v.15, no.14, 2014 , pp. 5937-5940 More about this Journal
Abstract
Background: This study was conducted as a descriptive-correlational exercise with the aim of determining the effect of student perceptions of social skills on their pro and con perceptions of smoking. Materials and Methods: The study sample comprised 106 students at $6^{th}$, $7^{th}$ and $8^{th}$ grades in three primary schools. The data were collected through socio-demographic data collection form, Social Skill Perception Form and Child Decisional Balance Scale. Data were evaluated by percentage calculation, Student t test and correlation analysis. Results: While the point average of pro perception of smoking of the students with a high point average of social skill perception, was $8.6{\pm}3.1$, in those with a low social skill perception point average it was $10.7{\pm}4.2$, the difference being significant(p=0.012). The respective point averages of con perceptions were $26.8{\pm}3.7$ and $23.5{\pm}3.3$, again significant (p=0.000). While a positive medium level (r=0.410) relationship was determined between the point average of social skill perception and con perception of smoking, a negative low level (r=0.281) relationship was determined with the pro perception of smoking. Conclusions: As the social skill perception point average increases, children's con perceptions of smoking increase and their pro perceptions decrease.
Keywords
Social skill; pros/cons perception; smoking among children; social skill perception and smoking;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Bandura A (1989). Social cognitive theory. In R. Vasta (Ed.). Annals of child development. Vol. 6. Six theories of child development, Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 6, 1-60.
2 Bandura A (1998). Health promotion from the perspective of social cognitive theory. Psychology and Hlth, 13, 623-49.   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Bektas M, Ozturk C, Armstrong M (2010a). An approach to children's smoking behavior using social cognitive learning theory. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 11, 1143-9.
4 Bektas M, Ozturk C, Armstrong M (2010b). Psychometric properties of a translated decisional balance scale for assessing and predicting children's smoking status. Anadolu Psikiyatri Derg, 11, 327-34.
5 Botvin GJ, Epstein JA, Schinke SP, Diaz T (1994). Predictors of cigarette smoking among inner-city minority youth. J Dev Behav Pediatr, 15, 67-73.
6 Chen HS, Horner SD, Percy MS, et al (2008). Stages of smoking acquisition of young taiwanese adolescents: Self-Efficacy and decisional balance. Res Nurs Health, 31, 119-29.   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Chen HS, Sheu JJ, Percy MS and ark (2006). The Chinese version of the decisional balance scale. Nurs Res, 55, 225-30.   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Cremers HP, Mercken L, Oenema A, de Vries H (2012). A webbased computer-tailored smoking prevention programme for primary school children: intervention design and study protocol. BMC public health, 12, 277.   DOI
9 De Jesus MC (2000). Comparison of smoking beliefs among columbus, Ohio third graders and their parents, Master Thesis, Graduate School of The Ohio State University, USA, 1-63.
10 De Vries H, Mudde A, Kremers S, et al (2003). The european smoking prevention framework approach (ESFA): shortterm effects. Health Educ Res, 18, 649-63.   DOI
11 Epstein JA, Bang H, Botvin GJ (2007). Which psychosocial factors moderate or directly affect substance use among inner-city adolescents? Addict Behav, 32, 700-13.   DOI
12 Epstein JA, Botvin GJ, Spoth R (2003). Predicting smoking among rural adolescents: Social and cognitive processes. Nicotine Tob Res, 5, 485-91.   DOI
13 Epstein JA, Griffin KW, Botvin GJ (2000). Competence skills help deter smoking among iner city adolescents. Tob Control, 9, 33-9   DOI
14 Global Youth Tobacco Survey (GYTS) (2003). Fact sheet. URL:http://apps.nccd.cdc.gov/GTSSData/Ancillary/ DataReports.aspx?Option=1#T retrived date 01/12/2013.
15 Griffin KW, Botvin GJ, Scheier LM, Epstein JA, Doyle MM. (2002). Personal competence skills, distress, and well-being as determinants of substance use in a predominantly minority urban adolescent sample. Prev Sci, 3, 23-33.   DOI
16 Griffin KW, Epstein JA, Botvin GJ, Spoth RL (2001). Social competence and substance use among rural youth: mediating role of social benefit expectancies of use. J Youth and Adolescence, 30, 485-98.   DOI
17 Hiemstra M, Ringlever L, Otten R, et al (2009). Efficacy of smoking prevention program “Smoke-free Kids”: study protocol of a randomized controlled trial. BMC Public Health, 9, 477.   DOI
18 Hover SJ, Gaffney LR (2002). Factors associated with smoking behavior in adolescent gilrs. Addict Behav, 13, 139-45.
19 La Torre G, Chiaradia G, Monte L, et al. (2010). A randomised controlled trial of a school-based intervention to prevent tobacco use among children and adolescents in Italy. J Pub Health, 18, 533-42.   DOI
20 Lamborn SD, Mounts NS, Steinberg L, et al (1991). Patterns of competence and adjustment among adolescents from authoritative, authoritarian, indulgent, and neglectful families. Child Development, 62, 1049-65.   DOI   ScienceOn
21 Longlios MA, Petosa R, Halam JS (1999). Why do effective smoking prevention programs work? Studnet changes in social cognitive theory constructs. J School Health, 69, 326-31.   DOI   ScienceOn
22 Plummer BA, Velicer WF, Redding CA, et al (2001). Stage of change, decisional balance, and temptations for smoking measurement and validation in a large, school-based population of adolescents. Addict Behav, 26, 551-71.   DOI   ScienceOn
23 Sarah E, Garrison MM, Chiristakis DA, et al (2005). A systemic review of school-based smoking prevention trails with longterm fallow-up. J Adolencent Health, 36, 162-9.   DOI   ScienceOn
24 Scheier LM, Botvin GJ, Diaz T, Griffin KW (1999). Social skills, competence, and drug refusal efficacy as redictors of adolescent alcohol use. J Drug Education, 29, 251-78.   DOI
25 Spyratos DG, Pelagidou DT, Chloros D, et al (2012). Smoking among adolescents in Northern Greece: A large crosssectional study about risk and preventive factors. Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy, 7, 38.   DOI
26 Ulgen H, Ozturk C, Armstrong M (2012). Effect of self-efficacy on Turkish children's perceptions of the advantages/ disadvantages of smoking. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 13, 795-98.   과학기술학회마을   DOI   ScienceOn
27 Velicer WF, DiClemente CC, Prochaska JO, et al (1985). Decisional balance measure for assessing and predicting smoking status. J Pers Soc Psychol, 48, 1279-89.   DOI
28 WHO (2005). Healt professionals against tobacco. Edt. Tutun kontrolunde saglik profesyonellerinin Rolu. Ankara.
29 WHO (2008). Report on The global tobacco epidemics 2008. Geneva.
30 WHO (2007). The European Tobacco Control Report 2007. Edt. Avrupa tutun kontrolu raporu 2007. WHO Turkiye Ofisi.
31 WHO (2012). World Health Statistic 2012. Geneva.
32 Menrath I, Mueller-Godeffroy E, Pruessmann C, et al (2012). Evaluation of school-based life skills programmes in a highrisk sample: a controlled longitudinal multi-centre study. J Pub Health, 20, 159-70.   DOI