Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5695/JKISE.2021.54.3.133

Effect of Negative Substrate Bias Voltage on the Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Nanostructured Ti-Al-N-O Coatings Prepared by Cathodic Arc Evaporation  

Heo, Sungbo (Korea Institute of Industrial Technology (KITECH))
Kim, Wang Ryeol (Korea Institute of Industrial Technology (KITECH))
Park, In-Wook (Korea Institute of Industrial Technology (KITECH))
Publication Information
Journal of the Korean institute of surface engineering / v.54, no.3, 2021 , pp. 133-138 More about this Journal
Abstract
Ternary Ti-X-N coatings, where X = Al, Si, Cr, O, etc., have been widely used for machining tools and cutting tools such as inserts, end-mills, and etc. Ti-Al-N-O coatings were deposited onto silicon wafer and WC-Co substrates by a cathodic arc evaporation (CAE) technique at various negative substrate bias voltages. In this study, the influence of substrate bias voltages during deposition on the microstructure and mechanical properties of Ti-Al-N-O coatings were systematically investigated to optimize the CAE deposition condition. Based on results from various analyses, the Ti-Al-N-O coatings prepared at substrate bias voltage of -80 V in the process exhibited excellent mechanical properties with a higher compressive residual stress. The Ti-Al-N-O (-80 V) coating exhibited the highest hardness around 30 GPa and elastic modulus around 303 GPa. The improvement of mechanical properties with optimized bias voltage of -80 V can be explained with the diminution of macroparticles, film densification and residual stress induced by ion bombardment effect. However, the increasing bias voltage above -80 V caused reduction in film deposition rate in the Ti-Al-N-O coatings due to re-sputtering and ion bombardment phenomenon.
Keywords
Ti-Al-N-O Coatings; Substrate bias voltage; Cathodic arc evaporation; Microstructure;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 C. L. Chang, C. S. Huang, Thin Solid Films 519 (2011) 4923-4927.   DOI
2 C. Mitterer, F. Holler, F. Ustel, D. Heim, Surf. Coat. Technol. 125 (2000) 233-239.   DOI
3 M. Sokovic, B. Barisic, S. Sladic, J Mater Process Technol. 209 (2009) 4207-4216.   DOI
4 S.Y. Yoon, K.O. Lee, S.S. Kang, K.H. Kim, J Mater Process Technol. 130-131 (2002) 260-265.   DOI
5 J.H. Hsieh, C. Liang, C.H. Yu, W. Wu, Surf. Coat. Technol. 108-109 (1998) 132-137.   DOI
6 Y. Zhang, J. Dai, G. Bai, H. Zhang, Mater. Chem. Phys. 241 (2020) 122374.   DOI
7 F. Cai, M. Chen, M. Li, S. Zhanga, Ceram. Int. 43 (2017) 3774-3783.   DOI
8 S. Heo, M. Lee, H. Kim, W. R. Kim, J.H. Kim, I. W. Park, D. Kim, J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 18(7) (2017) 4195-4198.
9 C.A. Davis, Thin Solid Films 226(1) (1993) 30-34.   DOI
10 A.N Kale, K. Ravindranath, D.C. Kothari, P.M. Raole, Surf. Coat. Technol. 145(1-3) (2001) 57-61.
11 J. Kobata, K.I. Miura, Mater. Des. 111 (2016) 271-278.   DOI
12 K. Kawata, H. Sugimura, O. Takai, Thin Solid Films 386 (2001) 271-275.   DOI
13 J. Jang, S. Heo, W.R. Kim, J.H. Kim, D.G. Nam, K.H. Kim, I. Park, I.W. Park, J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 18(3) (2018) 2100-2103.   DOI