Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.7469/JKSQM.2022.50.4.843

Competitive Advantage Strategy of Educational Service Quality on Digital Transformation : Focusing on W-Company  

Chin, Hee Soo (College of Business Administration, Inha University)
Lee, Dong Won (College of Business Administration, Inha University)
Lee, DonHee (College of Business Administration, Inha University)
Publication Information
Abstract
Purpose: This study explores the impact of digital transformation (DT) strategies on gaining a competitive advantage in interactive educational services. Methods: We develop a service value proposition model by analyzing educational service elements to confirm the impact of DT in the classroom through case studies. This study focuses on educational services that DT has a positive impact on organizational competitiveness by providing opportunities for customers to engage in operational processes. This case study summarizes competitiveness using SWOT (strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats) analysis. Results: The findings of the case study indicate that DT-enabled competitive factors contribute to an organization's competitive advantage. The study results present key resource as social cloud services, data combination, content sharing, and products/services. The online application that collects user data about education and shares class and evaluation information creates a new class operational process in the field of educational service for a value proposition of collection-merging-sharing with social cloud function. Conclusion: The results of this study can be used as a good guideline for educational service providers interested in applying DT for improved customer satisfaction and educational organizations' competitiveness. In addition, the study findings provide theoretical and practical implications on SWOT approaches to changing the educational service provision ways through digital transformation.
Keywords
Digital Transformation (DT); Competitive Strategy; Value Proposition Model; Educational Service Quality; SWOT; Case Study;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 3  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Cai, R. and Wang, Q. 2020. A Six-step Online Teaching Method Based on Protocol-guided Learning during the COVID-19 Epidemic: A Case Study of the First Middle School Teaching Practice in Changyuan City, Henan Province, China. Best Evidence of Chinese Education 4(2):529-534.   DOI
2 Chin, H. and Lee, D. 2022. A Study on Digital Transformation Competitive Strategy of Accommodation Reservation Service Industry: A Case Study. Journal of the Korea Industrial Information Systems Research 27(1):93-109.   DOI
3 Green, C. 1998. Communicating Service Quality: Are Business to-Business Ads Different? The Journal of Service Marketing 12(3):165-176.
4 KEDI(Korean Educational Development Institute). 2020. Educational Policy Responding to Post-COVID-19 (Distance Learning). www.kedi.re.kr (Accessed on Aug. 3rd, 2022).
5 Kim, B. and Han, S. 2020. A Study on Satisfaction with Involuntary University Online Lecture by Corona 19. The Journal of General Education 13:7-31.   DOI
6 Kim, B. and Kim, Y. 2018. A Study on Structural Relationships among Academic Achievement Variables for Smart Learning Performance. Journal of the Korea Industrial Information Systems Research 23(2):53-61.   DOI
7 Kim, J. 2019. A Study on Balanced Team Formation Method Reflecting Characteristics of Students. Journal of the Korea Industrial Information Systems Research 24(6):55-65.
8 Kim, K. 2021a. An Exploratory Study on the Educational Enviroment for the Application of Virtual Reality Contents to the Curriculum -Focusing on Improving the Quality of Education. Journal of Korean Society for Quality Management 49(3):405-420.
9 Kim, M. and Park, J. 2019. The Importance-Satisfaction Analysis of Service Quality in University. Journal of Korean Society for Quality Management 47(4):807-822.
10 Kim, S. 2021b. In the Digital Big Data Classroom Reality and Application of Smart Education: Learner-Centered Education using Edutech. Journal of the Korea Entertainment Industry Association 15(4):279-286.   DOI
11 Ku, H. and Park, Y. 2010. Measuring Learner Satisfaction in e-learning using SERVQUAL. Journal of Korean Socity Quality Management 38(2):161-170.
12 Lee, D. 2017. The effects of Educational Service Quality and Participation Intention on Educational Performance through a Case of Action Learning. Journal of Korean Society Quality Management 45(4):847-866.   DOI
13 Lee, D. 2019. A Model for Designing Healthcare Service based on the Patient Experience. International Journal of Healthcare Management 12(3):180-188.   DOI
14 Lee, D. and Lee, D. 2021. Effective Communication Method for e-learning under the COVID-19 Pandemic: Focusing on ITO. Journal of the Korea Industrial Information Systems Research 26(1):67-82.   DOI
15 Lee, K. C. 2004. Causal Model Study on the Effect of Education Service Quality on Students Satisfaction, University Image and Behavior Intention. The Korean Educational Administration Society 22(4):287-309.
16 Lee, K. Kwon, S., Yang, C., Koh, D., Kim, K., and Choi, M. 2021. Exploring Future School Education Scenarios in the Era of Digital Transformation. The Korean Society For The Study of Teacher Education 37(2):1-25.
17 Lee, S. and Lee, D. 2020. Untact: A New Customer Service Strategy in the Digital Age. Service Business 14(1):1-22.   DOI
18 Matt, C., Hess, T., and Benlian, A. 2015. Digital Transformation Strategies. Business and Information Systems Engineering 57(5):339-343.   DOI
19 Nguyen, L., Barton, S., and Nguyen, L. 2015. iPads in Higher Education-Hype and Hope. British Journal of Educational Technology 46(1):190-230.
20 Park, M. S., Bae, K. M., and Kim, Y. S. 2021. How to Apply the New Quality Dimensions to the New Business in the Digital Transformation Era? Journal of the Korean Society for Quality Management 49(4):609-622.   DOI
21 Pocatilu, P., Alecu, F., and Vetrici, M. 2010. Cloud Computing Benefits for e-Learning Solutions. Economics of Knowledge 2(1):9-14.
22 Porter, M. 2001. Strategy and the Internet? Harvard Business Review 79(3):63-78.
23 Porter, M. 2008. The Five Competitive Forces that Shape Strategy. Harvard Business Review 86(1):78-93.
24 Porter, M., and Heppelmann, J. 2014. How Smart, Connected Products are Transforming Competition. Harvard Business Review 92:64-88.
25 Porter, M. and Millar, V. 1985. How Information Gives you Competitive Advantage. Harvard Business Review 63(Jul-Aug):149-160.
26 Rha, J. and Lee, H. 2022. Research Trends in Digital Transformation in the Service Sector: A Review based on Network Text Analysis. Service Business 16(1):77-98.   DOI
27 Seo, J., An, S. J., and Choi, J. I. 2022. A Study on Factors Affecting Intention to Use Online Collaboration Tools for the non-Face-to-Face Educational Environment. Journal of Korean Society for Quality Management 50(3):571-591.   DOI
28 Son, H. 2021. A Study on Governance of Intelligent Information Society by Digital Transformation. Public Law 49(3):199-230.   DOI
29 Vial, G. 2019. Understanding Digital Transformation: A Review and a Research Agenda. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems 28(2):118-144.
30 Zhou, L., Wu, S., Zhou, M., and Li, F. 2020. School's Out, but Class's On, the Largest Online Education in the World Today: Taking China's Practical Exploration during the COVID-19 Epidemic Prevention and Control as an Example. Best Evidence of Chinese Education 4(2):501-519.   DOI