Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.7469/JKSQM.2021.49.3.269

A Study on the Reflection of Condition-Based Maintenance Requirement in the Defense Specification  

Son, Minjeong (C4ISR Systems Development Quality Team, Development Quality Research Center, Defense Agency for Technology and Quality)
Kim, Young-Gil (C4ISR Systems Development Quality Team, Development Quality Research Center, Defense Agency for Technology and Quality)
Publication Information
Journal of Korean Society for Quality Management / v.49, no.3, 2021 , pp. 269-279 More about this Journal
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to suggest weapon system specifications for requirements of Condition-Based Maintenance(CBM/CBM+). Methods: The military documents and case studies with regard to condition-based maintenance were reviewed. Representative Korea defense specifications of weapon system such as an aircraft, a C4ISR etc. were analyzed and investigated the level of requirement for maintainability was. Results: Condition-based maintenance was defined in both U.S. instruction and Korean directive. While deparment of defense(U.S.) provide a guidebook for CBM+, detailed instruction was not sufficient for Korean. Ministry of national defense(ROK) define the CBM+ by means of IPS element which should be developed along with the system development. The maintainability was barely included in Korean defense specifications, except for BIT(Built-in test) function. As a first step for defining the condition-based maintenance requirement in defense specification, this study suggests a standard form for data needed to acquire according to types of system, fault, failure, and so on. Conclusion: The empirical researches on CMB/CBM+ with domestic weapon systems are not enough, and a logic which leads the maintenance strategy to CMB/CBM+ is not solved. Through technical researches and institutional improvements including this study, we hope that condition-based maintenance would be fully established in the Korean defense field.
Keywords
Condition-Based Maintenance($CBM/CBM^+$); Defense Specification Requirement; Development Phase; Maintainability; Total Life Cycle Systems Management(TLCSM);
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Adhikari PP and Buderath M. 2016. A framework for aircraft maintenance strategy including CBM. Proceedings of European Conference of the Prognostics and Health Management 3(1):1-10.
2 Choi CH. 2019. A case study on application of R&D quality assuarance to secure high quality for military supplies. Journal of the Korean Society for Quality Management 47(1):151-162.   DOI
3 DAPA(Defense Acquisition Program Administration). 2017. Korean defense specification: radar set, local air defense.
4 DAPA(Defense Acquisition Program Administration). 2020. Korean defense specification: helicopter, utility.
5 DoD(Department of Defense). 2008. Condition Based Maintenance Plus DoD Guidebook.
6 Serradilla O, Zugasti E, Cernuda C, Aranburu A, Okariz JR, and Zurutuza U. 2020. Interpreting remaining useful life estimations combining explainable artificial intelligence and domain knowledge in industrial machinery. Proceedings of IEEE international conference on Fuzzy Systems;19-42 July 2020; Glasglow UK.
7 Jo G, Cho Y, and Jang J. 2021. An experimental study on CBM+ of trasmission in depot maintenance for missile vehicle system. Journal of the Military Operations Research Society of Korea 47(1):46-62.
8 Kim GY, Hwang JK, Im YK, and Ha SW. 2019. Roadmap configuration for technical elements acquisition of military fixed wing aircraft parts PHM and verification of parts selection phase. Journal of the Korean Society for Aeronautical & Space Sciences 47(9):665-677.   DOI
9 MND(Ministry of National Defense). 2021. Directive on defense force development.
10 Powrie H and Novis A. 2006. Gas path debris monitoring for F-35 Joint Striker Fighter propulsion system PHM. Proceedings of aerospace conference IEEE; 2006 Mar 4-11; MT USA.
11 Seo BW, Yim SO, Choi YH, and Kim BH. 2020. A methodology research on development stage of submarine vessel through QMST/QCG system. Journal of the Korean Society for Quality Management 48(3):521-534.   DOI
12 Tinga T. 2013. Predictive maintenance of military systems based on physical failure models. Chemical Engineering Transactions 33:295-300.
13 Wang Y, Zhao Y, and Addepalli S. 2020. Remaining useful life prediction using deep learning approaches: a review. Procedia Manufacturing 49:81-88.   DOI
14 Xiang L, Qian D, and Jian-Qiao S. 2018. Remaining useful life estimation in prognostics using deep convolution neural networks. Reliability Engineering and System Safety 172:1-11.   DOI
15 Yu BY, Honda T, Zubair SM, Sharqawy MH, and Yang MC. 2016. A maintenance-focused approach to complex system design. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing 30(3):263-276.   DOI
16 DAPA(Defense Acquisition Program Administration). 2021. Korean defense specification: gun, air defense artillery, 30mm, wheeled, self-propelled.
17 DAPA(Defense Acquisition Program Administration). 2021. Korean defense specification: thermal imaging system.
18 DoD(Department of Defense). 2020. Instruction 4151.22 Condition-Based Maintenance Plus for Materiel Maintenance.
19 Kilby TS, Rabeno E, and Earvey J. 2011. Enabling condition based maintenance with health and usage monitoring systems. Proceedings of 7th DSTO international conference on Health and Usage Monitoring; 2011 Feb 28 - Mar 2; Melbourne Australia.
20 Gang Niu, Yang BS, and Pecht M. 2010. Development of an optimized condition-based maintenance system by data fusion and reliability-centered maintenance. Reliability Engineering and System Safety. 95(7). 786-796.   DOI
21 Jung IH, Seo S, and Jang BK. 2017. A case study on the quality control strengthening in development phase of weapon systems. Journal of the Korean Society for Quality Management 45(3):349-364.   DOI
22 Kim SJ, Choe BH, and Kim W. 2017. Prognostics for Industry 4.0 and its application to fitness-for-service assessment of corroded gas pipelines. Journal of the Korean Society for Quality Management 45(4):649-664.   DOI
23 Kumar S, Goyal D, Dang RK, Dharni SS, and Mabla BS. 2018. Condition based maintenance of bearing and gears for fault detection-a review. Materials today: Proceedings 5(2):6128-6237.   DOI
24 MND(Ministry of National Defense). 2021. Directive on total life cycle management.
25 Park YM, Kim BU, Kim SH, and Noh SW. 2019. A study on durability life improvement of blower for military armored vehicle and self-propelled artillery. Journal of the Korean Society for Quality Management 47(3):453-465.   DOI
26 Rabeno E and Bounds M. 2009. Condition based maintenance of military ground vehicles. Proceedings of aerospace conference IEEE; 2009 Mar 7-14; MT USA.
27 Seo BS, Hwang TW, Jang BC, Song JH, Sohn YH, Lee DG, and Yoon BD. 2019. Introduction of the 4th industrial revolition and seccess stories through PHM technology. Journal of the Korean Society of Mechanical Engineers 59(1):32-37.
28 Seo MK and Yun WY. 2019. Condition monitoring and diagnosis of a hot strip roughing mill using an autoencoder 47(1):75-86.   DOI
29 Seo YH, Kim SR, Kim BK, and Ma PS. 2018. Life prediction of bearing by statistical estimation of state index. Journal of the Korean Society for Noise and Vibration Engineering 28(3):339-347.   DOI
30 Shin JK and Jun HB. 2015. On condition based maintenance policy. Journal of Computational Design and Engineering 2(2):119-227.   DOI
31 Teixeira HN, Lopes I, and Braga, AC. 2020. Condition-based maintenance implementation: a literature review. Procedia Manufacturing 51:228-235.   DOI
32 Vachtsevanos G, Lewis F, Roemer M, Hess A, and Wu B. 2006. Intelligent fault diagnosis and prognosis for engineering systems. 1st ed. Huboken, New Jersey; John Wiley and Sons Inc..