Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.7469/JKSQM.2020.48.1.149

A Study on the Impact of Continuous Improvement Activities of Defense SMEs on the SCQM and Business Performance  

Choi, Sukgu (Defence Agency for Technology and Quality)
Lee, Taewha (Graduate School of Business Administration, Soongsil University)
Yoo, Hanjoo (Division of Business Administration, Soongsil University)
Song, Gwangsuk (Division of Business Administration, Soongsil University)
Publication Information
Abstract
Purpose: This study analyzes the characteristics of the Quality Management performed by SMEs in the Defense Industry in supply chains and analyzes the effect of the continuous improvement activities based on cooperation. Especially, for Military Supplies, the suitability of products is usually decided by judging their conformity to the specification, and from this structural characteristic, this study would analyze the structural relationship of systematic improvement activities with Supply Chain Quality Management(SCQM) and Business Performance(BP). Methods: Continuous improvement activities(CI) have significance as the driver force for the promotion of Quality Management. Thus, this study analyzed the causal relationships from the perspective of the process among CI, SCQM and BP. For an analysis of the structural characteristics and causal relationships among the constituents, AMOS was used, and 297 companies in the Defense Industry were utilized as samples. Results: It turned out that CI had significant impacts on Management Infra(MGT_Infra), Process Management(PM), Human Resources Management(HRM) and Communication(COMU) and had an indirect impact on the enterprises' financial performance through the parameters of HRM and Communication. Meanwhile, it turned out that between CI and non-financial performance, there was a direct effect, and there was also an indirect effect through the variables of the Management Infra and Communication. Conclusion: It turned out that CI had a positive effect on SCQM as a proactive driver and that they had significant relationships with BP(financial, Non-financial), both financial performance and non-financial performance. However, PM did not have a significant relationship of effect with BP because of the character appearing by the evaluation method of military supplies for the conformity to the specifications.
Keywords
Continuous Improvement; Kaizen; SCQM; Defense Industry;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 4  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Ann, Y. S., Jang, W. J., Kim, J. H., Kim, C. M., and Jo, E. J. 2011. Competitiveness Evaluation for Defense Industry in Korea, KIET.
2 Bandyopadhyay, J. K., and Sprague, D. A. 2003. Total Quality Management in an Automotive Supply Chain in the United States. International Journal of Management 20(1):17-22.
3 Black, S. A., and Porter, L. J. 1996. Identification of the Critical Factors of TQM. Decision Sciences 27(1):1-21.   DOI
4 Lin, C., Chow, W. S., Madu, C. N., Kuei, C. H., and Yu, P. P. 2005. A Structural Equation Model of Supply Chain Quality Management and Organizational Performance. International journal of production economics 96(3):355-365.   DOI
5 Kwon, Y. H. 2010. The Study on the Effect of Fit between Quality Management and CSR to Business Performance. Journal KAABA 23(4):2775-2792.
6 Li, S., Ragu-Nathan, B., Ragu-Nathan, T. S., and Rao, S. S. 2006. The Impact of Supply Chain Management Practices on Competitive Advantage and Organizational Performance. Omega 34(2):107-124.   DOI
7 Lin, C., Chow, W. S., Madu, C. N., Kuei, C. H., and Yu, P. P. 2005. A Structural Equation Model of Supply Chain Quality Management and Organizational Performance. International Journal of Production Economics 96(3):355-365.   DOI
8 Chow, W. S., Madu, C. N., Kuei, C., Lu, M. H., Lin, C., and Tseng, H. 2008. Supply Chain Management in the U.S. and Taiwan: An Empirical Study. Omega 36(5):665-679.   DOI
9 Cagnazzo, L., Taticchi, P., and Brun, A. 2010. The Role of Performance Measurement Systems to Support Quality Improvement Initiatives at Supply Chain Level. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management 59(2):163-185.   DOI
10 Choi, Sukgu. Song, Gwangsuk, and Yoo, Hanjoo. 2017. The Effect of SCQM Activities on the Business Performance of the Defense SMEs : Focused on the Moderating Effects of the Performance Sharing. Journal of the Korea Society for Quality Management 45(4):867-888.   DOI
11 Das, T. K., and Teng, B. S. 2003. Partner Analysis and Alliance Performance. Scandinavian Journal of Management 19(3):279-308.   DOI
12 Douglas, T. J., and Judge Jr, W. Q. 2001. Total Quality Management Implementation and Competitive Advantage: the role of Structural Control and Exploration. Academy of Management Journal 44(1):158-169.
13 Flynn, B. B., Schroeder, R. G. and Sakakibara, S. 1995. The Impact of Quality Management Practices on Performance and Competitive Advantage. Decision Sciences 26(5):659-691.   DOI
14 Fornell, C., and Larcker, D. F. 1981. Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research 18(1):39-50.   DOI
15 Foster Jr, S. T. 2008. Towards an Understanding of Supply Chain Quality Management. Journal of Operations Management 26(4):461-467.   DOI
16 Kuei, C. H., & Madu, C. N. 2001. Identifying Critical Success Factors for Supply Chain Quality Management(SCQM). Asia Pacific Management Review 6(4):409-423.
17 Martinez-Costa, M., and Jimenez-Jimenez, D. 2008. Are companies that implement TQM better Learning Organizations? An Empirical Study. Total Quality Management 19(11):1101-1115.   DOI
18 Mayer, J. A., Borchardt, M., and Pereira, G. M. 2016. Methodology for the Collaboration in Supply Chains with a Focus on Continuous Improvement. Ingenieria e Investigacion 36(2):51-59.   DOI
19 Mohrman, S. A., Tenkasi, R. V., Lawler, E. E., and Ledford, G. E. 1995. Total Quality Management: Practice and Outcomes in the Largest US firms. Employee Relations 17(3):26-41.   DOI
20 Kuei, C., Madu, C. N. Lin, C. & Chow, W. S. 2002. Developing Supply Chain Strategies Based on the Survey of Supply Chain Quality and Technology Management. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management 19(7):889-901.   DOI
21 Kannan, V. R., and Tan, K. C. 2005. Just In Time. Total Quality Management. and Supply Chain Management: Understanding Their Linkages and Impact on Business Performance. Omega 33(2):153-162.   DOI
22 Hung, R. Y. Y., Lien, B. Y. H., Yang, B., Wu, C. M., and Kuo, Y. M. 2011. Impact of TQM and Organizational Learning on Innovation Performance in the High-Tech Industry. International Business Review 20(2):213-225.   DOI
23 Jeong. Younggkwon, Cho, Hyunki. and Yoo, Hanjoo. 2019. A Study on the Development & Evaluation of Defense Quality Maturity Index. Journal of the Korea Society for Quality Management 47(3):479-496.   DOI
24 Joiner, T. A. 2007. Total Quality Management and Performance: The Role of Organization Support and Co-Worker Support. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management 24(6):617-627.   DOI
25 Kaynak, H., and Hartley, J. L. 2008. A Replication and Extension of Quality Management into the Supply Chain. Journal of Operations Management 26(4):468-489.   DOI
26 Kelle, P., and Akbulut, A. 2005. The Role of ERP Tools in Supply Chain Information Sharing. Cooperation, and Cost Optimization. International Journal of Production Economics 93-94:41-52.   DOI
27 Kim, H. J., and Kim, S. W. 2014. Analysis of Supplier Selection in Improving Supply Chain Quality Management. Journal of the Korean Society of Supply Chain Management 14(1):113-125.
28 Kim, Soowook. 2004. The Role of Supply Chain Integration for Firm Performance Improvement. Korean Management Review 33(2):631-653.
29 Kim, Sung-Hong & Kim, Jin-Han. 2007. Success Factors of Inter-Firm Collaboration : Moderated Effects of Contextual Factors. Korean Jouranl of Business Administration 20(2):913-937.
30 Robinson, C. J., and Malhotra, M. K. 2005. Defining the Concept of Supply Chain Quality Management and its Relevance to Academic and Industrial Practice. International Journal of Production Economics. 96(3):315-337.   DOI
31 Saxton, T. 1997. The Effects of Partner and Relationship Characteristics on Alliance Outcomes. Academy of Management Journal 40(2):443-461.   DOI
32 Segars, A. H., Harkness, W. J., Kettinger, W. J. 2001. Process Management and Supply Chain Integration at the Bose Corporation. Interfaces 31:102-114.   DOI
33 Sila. I. 2007. Examining the Effects of Contextual Factors on TQM and Performance Through the Lens of Organizational Theories : An Empirical Study. Journal of Operations Management 25(1):83-109.   DOI
34 www.sedaily.com/NewsVIew/1VE2NBKC9O.
35 KSA. 2009. SCQM Guide Book. KATS & KSA.
36 Tan, K. C., Kannan, V. R., and Handfield, R. B. 1998. Supply Chain Management: Supplier Performance and Firm Performance. Journal of Supply Chain Management 34(3):2-9.
37 Tari, J. J., and Sabater, V. 2004. Quality Tools and Techniques: Are They Necessary for Quality Management. International Journal of Production Economics 92(3):267-280.   DOI
38 Vonderembse, M. A., and Tracey, M. 1999. The Impact of Supplier Selection Criteria and Supplier Involvement on Manufacturing Performance. Journal of Supply Chain Management 35(3):33-39.   DOI
39 Walsh, A., Hughes, H., and Maddox, D. P. 2002. Total Quality Management Continuous Improvement: Is the Philosophy a Reality?. Journal of European Industrial Training 26(6):299-307.   DOI