Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.7469/JKSQM.2019.47.1.17

The Quality Performance Management of CMMI in the Era of Industry 4.0  

Cho, Kyoung-Shik (Department of Management of Technology, Sungkyunkwan University)
Shin, Wan Seon (Department of Systems Management Engineering, Sungkyunkwan University)
Publication Information
Journal of Korean Society for Quality Management / v.47, no.1, 2019 , pp. 17-32 More about this Journal
Abstract
Purpose: CMMI is a process model used to assess or improve an organization's software development capabilities. This paper deals with the quality indicators when using CMMI and their priorities for possible improvement. Methods: The 22 process areas and 167 practices of CMMI are matched with 60 indicators of Quality Scorecard(QSC) first to analyze the balance of CMMI in terms of prevention, appraisal, and final result categories and second to isolate a set of key areas for quality focused performance measures. Results: A total of 86.2% (144 out of 167) CMMI practices were mapped to QSC. According to the CMMI level of maturity, level 2 and 3 accounted for more than 75% of the total. The practices at the maturity level of 4 and 5 were mapped to more than 52% of the final result's measurements. It has been observed that CMMI practices need further elaboration at higher levels to consider prevention, appraisal, and final results simultaneously. Conclusion: In order to improve the quality performance of the organization by applying CMMI, the final result measures should be refined in metrics, cycles, and methods, and then corrective actions could be conducted to improve the performance of CMMI practices. This strategy would help the practitioners benefit from CMMI in fostering the overall quality level of key activities for the organization's business goals.
Keywords
Capability Maturity Model Integration; CMMI; Quality Scorecard; QSC; Performance Measures; Cost of Quality; Industry 4.0;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 5  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 CMMI Institute. 2018. Maturity-Profile-31-December-2017. https://cmmiinstitute.com/resource-files/public/ quality/maturity-profiles/maturity-profile-ending-31-december-2017.
2 Cooper, Robin, and Robert S. Kaplan. 1992. "Activity-based systems: Measuring the costs of resource usage." Accounting horizons 6(3):1-13.
3 Dahlgaard, Jens J., Kai Kristensen, and Gopal K. Kanji. 1992. "Quality costs and total quality management." Total Quality Management 3(3):211-222.   DOI
4 Dennis R. Goldenson, and Diane L. Gibson. 2003. "Demonstrating the Impact and Benefits of CMMI." CMU/SEI-2003-SR-009.
5 Feigenbaum, Armand V. 1956. "Total quality-control." Harvard business review 34(6):93-101.
6 Hatry, Harry P. 1980. Performance measurement principles and techniques: An overview for local government. Public Productivity Review:312-339.   DOI
7 Hyun Park, Sung, Wan Seon Shin, Young Hyun Park, and Youngjo Lee. 2017. "Building a new culture for quality management in the era of the Fourth Industrial Revolution." Total Quality Management & Business Excellence 28(9-10):934-945.   DOI
8 John Bourn, NAO. 1997. Value for Money Review of Performance Measurement, Report by the Comptroller and Auditor General on Highlands and Islands Enterprise:18-23.
9 Kanji, Gopal K., and Patricia Moura e Sa. 2002. "Kanji's business scorecard." Total Quality Management 13(1):13-27.   DOI
10 Kaplan, R. S., and Norton, D. P. 1993. "Putting the balanced scorecard to work." Harvard Business Review 71(5):134-140.
11 Kulpa, Margaret K., and Kent A. Johnson. 2003. Interpreting the CMMI (R): A Process Improvement Approach. Auerbach Publications.
12 Oztaysi, Basar, and Cengiz Kahraman. 2014. "Quantification of corporate performance using fuzzy analytic network process: The case of e-commerce." In Handbook of Research on Novel Soft Computing Intelligent Algorithms: Theory and Practical Applications:385-413. IGI Global.
13 Lee Min-Hwa, and Kang, Man-Keum. 2016. "AI and the Fourth Industrial Revolution and the nature of AI Revolution." KOREA INSTITUTE OF BRAIN SCIENCE BRAIN 57:14-16.
14 Lee, Min-Jae, Sung-Yul Rhew, and Sung-Tae Kim. 2010. "Analysis of Relationship between GPs and SPs in CMMI Maturity Level 2 and Verifying the Applicable Efficiency." Journal of KIISE: Software and Applications 37(6):480-485.
15 Lee, Min-Jae. 2013. CMMI for Development Manual, Hantee MEDIA Press.
16 Meidan, Ayman, Julian A. Garcia-Garcia, Isabel Ramos, and Maria Jose Escalona. 2018. "Measuring Software Process: A Systematic Mapping Study." ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR) 51(3):58.
17 Montagud, Sonia, Silvia Abrahao, and Emilio Insfran. 2012. "A systematic review of quality attributes and measures for software product lines." Software Quality Journal 20(3-4):425-486.   DOI
18 Park, Young-Taek. 2014. The Theory of Quality Management. KOREA STANDARDS ASSOCIATION MEDIA Press.
19 Ree, Sangbok. 2017. "Proposal of Korean Quality Management in the 4th Industrial Revolution." Journal of the Korean Society for Quality Management 45(4):739-760.   DOI
20 Ree, Sangbok. 2018. "Proposal of Role of Quality People and Role of Quality Department in Korea." Journal of the Korean Society for Quality Management 46(4):785-796.   DOI
21 Roh, Hae-Young, and Shin, Wan-Seon. "A study on improvements of SPICE through comparison analysis with performance measurement model QSC." Masters degree dissertation of Sungkyunkwan University.
22 Chong, Hye Ran, Sung Hoon Hong, Min Koo Lee, and Hyuck Moo Kwon. 2017. "Quality Management on the 4th Industrial Revolution." Journal of the Korean Society for Quality Management 45(4):629-648.   DOI
23 Chung, Kyu Suk. 2018. "A Comparative Study among KPI Developing Methods." Journal of the Korean Society for Quality Management 46(4):863-876.   DOI
24 CMMI Institute. 2018. CMMI Benefits and Who Uses CMMI Presentation 2015. https://cmmiinstitute.zendesk.com/hc/ en-us/article_attachments/205847598/CMMI_Benefits_and_Who_Uses_CMMI_Presentation_2015.pdf.
25 Team, 2010. SEI CMMI Production. CMMI for Development v1. 3. Lulu.com.
26 Shin, Wan Seon, Jens J. Dahlgaard, Su Mi Dahlgaard-Park, and Min Gyu Kim. 2018. "A Quality Scorecard for the era of Industry 4.0." Total Quality Management & Business Excellence:1-18.
27 Shin, Wan Seon, Song Ho Jun, Kim Haewon, and Lee Yunji. 2018. "Open Quality for the Era of Industry 4.0: Concept, Methodology and Application." the 17th China-Korea Quality Symposium 2018 August (10-12):B-3-1.
28 Shin, Wan-Seon, and Ji-Won Kim. 2018. "Designing a Modular Safety Certification System for Convergence Products-Focusing on Autonomous Driving Cars." Journal of the Korean Society for Quality Management 46(4):1001-1004.   DOI
29 Striteska, Michaela, and Marketa Spickova. 2012. "Review and comparison of performance measurement systems." Journal of Organizational Management Studies 2012:1.