Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.7469/JKSQM.2018.46.4.877

Factors Affecting an Individual's Intention to Disclose Personal Health Information: From Privacy Calculus Perspective  

Jeong, Euiseon (Depart. Business Administration, Graduate School, Kyung Hee University)
Lee, Sang-Chul (Department of Big Data Management, KC University)
Suh, Yung-Ho (School of Management, Kyung Hee University)
Publication Information
Abstract
Purpose: This study empirically examines the effect of Communication Privacy Management(CPM) factors and Privacy Calculus factors to the intention to disclose Personal Health Information(PHI) in the context of healthcare ecosystem. Also, it investigates the moderating effects of CPM factors in the relationship between privacy calculus variables and the intention to disclose PHI. Methods: We conducted scenario-based repeated-measures quasiexperiment and used total 364 samples for analysis. Confirmatory factor analysis and repeated-measure ANOVA were employed using SPSS 24.0. Results: All CPM factors, such as type of information, requesting purpose, and requesting stakeholder, directly influence to the intention to disclose PHI, whereas only the medium trust out of the Privacy Calculus factors has direct influence on the intention to disclose PHI. With regard to the moderating effects, the requesting stakeholder is the most influential and the information type is the least influential construct. Conclusion: The findings suggest that healthcare system should be designed to provide more definite and personalized benefits to customers to enhance social and individual benefits by getting more participation from customers. Also, it is desirable that the requesting stakeholder of PHI would be non-profit organizations such as hospital, government or public agencies to secure more willingness of PHI from people. Furthermore, it is implied that extensive information gathering and utilization, instead of excluding sensitive information or critical patients' records, is recommended which is substantial to invigorate the healthcare industry.
Keywords
Privacy Calculus; CPM; Privacy; Healthcare; Intention to disclose PHI;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Anderson, C.L. and Agarwal R. 2011. "The Digitization of Healthcare: Boundary Risks, Emotion, and Consumer Willingness to Disclose Personal Health Information." Information Systems Research 22(3):469-490.   DOI
2 Bansal, G., Zahedi, F., and Gefen, D. 2010. "The impact of personal dispositions on information sensitivity, privacy concern and trust in disclosing health information online." Decision Support Systems 49:138-150.   DOI
3 Beckerman, J.Z., Pritts, J., Goplerud, E., Leifer, J.C., Borzi, P.A., Rosenbaum, S., and Anderson, D.R. 2008. "A delicate balance: Behavioral health, patient privacy, and the need to know." California Healthcare Foundation: Issue Brief. Accessed October 13. www.chcf.org/publication/a-delicate-balance-behaioral-health-patient-pri vacy-and-the-need-to-know.
4 Belanger, F. and Crossler, R.E. 2011. "Privacy in the digital age: A review of information privacy research in information systems." MIS Quarterly 35(4):1017-1042.   DOI
5 Bowman, G.S. 2001. "Emotions and illness." Journal of Advanced Nursing 34(2):256-263   DOI
6 Bowman, G., Watson, R, and Trotman-Beasty. 2006. "Primary emotions in patients after myocardial infarction." Journal of Advanced Nursing 53(6):636-645.   DOI
7 Chung, Y.S., Hong, S.C., and Chung, S.H. 2017. "The 4th Industrial Revolution and Activation of Healthcare Industry." KiRi Policy Seminar 42-64.
8 Churchill, G.A. and Peter, P. 1984. "Research Design Effects on The Reliability of Rating Scales: A Meta-Analysis." Journal of Marketing Research 21:360-370.   DOI
9 Culnan, M.J., and Armstrong, P.K. 1999. "Information privacy concerns, procedural fairness, and impersonal trust: an empirical investigation." Organization Science 10(1):104-115.   DOI
10 Dinev, T. and Hart, P. 2006. "An extended privacy calculus model for e-Commerce transactions." Inform. Systems Res 17(1):61-80.   DOI
11 KIDI. 2017. "The 4th Industrial Revolution in Japan." 4IR Monthly Brief 4:21-28.
12 Dinev, T., Hart, P., Mullen, M.R. 2008. "Internet privacy concerns and beliefs about government surveillance - an empirical investigation." The Journal of Strategic Information Systems 17(3):214-233.   DOI
13 Dinev, T., Xu, Smith, J.H. and Hart, P. 2012. "Information privacy and correlates: an empirical attempt to bridge and distinguish privacy-related concepts." European Journal of Information Systems 22:61-80.
14 Han, S.T., Kang, H.C., and Heo, M.H. 2004. Research Design and Variance Analysis Using SPSS. Seoul: SPSS Academy.
15 Li, H., Sarathy, R. and Xu, H. 2011. "The role of affect and cognition on online consumers' decision to disclose personal information to unfamiliar online vendors." Decision Support Systems 51:434-445.   DOI
16 Kim, I. and Yeo, J. 2017. "Consumers' Perception on Personal Information and Its Usage in Big Data Environment." Journal of Consumer Studies 28(6):129-148.
17 Kim, S.Y. and Lee, S.J. 2016. "The 4th Industrial Revolution and Insurance Product Development." KiRi Weekly 406:11-19.
18 R.S. and Wolfe, M. 1977. "Privacy as a concept and a social issue: a multidimensional development theory." Journal of Social Issues 33(3):23-42.
19 Li, Y. 2012. "Theories in online information privacy research: A critical review and an integrated framework." Decision Support Systems 54:471-481.   DOI
20 Loewenstein, G. 2005. "Hot-cold empathy gaps and medical decision making." Health Psychology 24(4):S49-S56.   DOI
21 Loewenstein, G.F., Weber, E.U., Hsee, C.K., and Welch, N. 2001. "Risk as Feelings." Psychological Bulletin 127(2):267-286.   DOI
22 Park, S.H., Kwon, E.N., Song, I.S., Lee, T.H., Kim, S.M., Hong, Y.S., Lee, Y.H., and Kim, J.Y. 2017. " IoT based Smart Healthcare Industry Trends." Korea Technology Innovation Society Symposium 311-319.
23 Nunnlly, J.A. and Bernsteun, H. 1994. Psychometric Theory, 3rd ed. New York:McGraw-Hill.
24 Nunnlly, J.A. 1997. Psychometric Theory, 2nd ed. NY:McGraw-Hill.
25 Park, C.M. 2008. "Korean Attitudes toward the Role of Government." Korean Political Science Review 42(4):269-288.
26 Stanton, J.M. 2003. Information technology and privacy: A boundary management perspective. S. Clarke, E. Coakes, M. G. Hunter, A. Wenn eds. Socio-Technical and Human Cognition Elements of Information Systems. London: Information Science Publishing 79-103.
27 Petronio, S. 2002. Boundaries of Privacy: Dialectics of Disclosure, Albany. NY: SUNY Press.
28 Potter, R.E. and Balthazard, P. 2004. "The role of individual memory and attention process during electronic brainstorming." MIS Quarterly 28(4):621-643.   DOI
29 R., Rosnow, R.L. 1984. Essentials of Behavioral Research: Methods and Data Analysis. Boston: McGraw-Hill. 141-148.
30 Steenkamp, Jan-Benedict. E.M. and Hans C.M. van Trijp. 1991. "The use of LISREL in Validating Marketing Constructs." International Journal of Research in Marketing. 8:283-299.   DOI
31 Stone, E.G., Gueutal, H.G., Gardner, D.G., and McClure, S. 1983. "A field experiment comparing information- privacy values, beliefs, and attitudes across several types of organizations." Journal of Applied Psychology 68(3):459-468.   DOI
32 Sun, Y., Wang, N. and Shen, X. 2015. "Location information disclosure in location-based social network services: Privacy calculus, benefit structure, and gender differences." Computers in Human Behavior 52: 278-292.   DOI
33 Vroom, V.H. 1964. Work and Motivation. New York: Wiley.