Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.7469/JKSQM.2018.46.3.441

A study on the quantitative risk grade assessment of initial mass production for weapon systems  

Jung, Yeongtak (Defence Agency for Technology and Quality)
Ham, Younghoon (Defence Agency for Technology and Quality)
Roh, Taegoo (Defence Agency for Technology and Quality)
Ahn, Manki (Defence Agency for Technology and Quality)
Ko, Kyungwa (Hanwha-systems)
Publication Information
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to study quantitative risk grade assessment for objective government quality assurance activities based on risk management in initial mass production for weapon systems. Methods: The Defense quality management regulations and foreign risk assessment documents are referred to analyze problems performing quality assurance actives. The failure rate data, maintainability and cost of products have been studied to quantify the risk Likelihood and impact. The analyzed data were classified as risk grade assessment through K-means Cluster Analysis method. Results: Results show that a proposed method can objectively evaluate risk grade. The analyzed results are clustered into three levels such as high, middle and low. Two products are allocated high, eleven low and seven middle. Conclusion: In this paper, quantitative risk grade assessment methods were presented by analyzing risk ratings based on objective data. The findings showed that the methods would be effective for initial mass production for weapon systems.
Keywords
Quantitative risk grade assessment; risk management; risk assessment matrix; risk evaluation; risk impact; reliability; maintainability; K-means cluster analysis;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 3  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Ahn, N.M. 2015. "Suggestion for Enhancement of Product Examination Government Quality Assurance Activity." J Korean Soc Qual Manag 43(3):327-340.   DOI
2 Beak, Y.G., Kang, B.S., and Jo, K.J. 2015. "An Objective method of risk assessment based on RAM analysis for warship." J Korean Soc Qual Manag 43(4):273-288.   DOI
3 DAPA Instruction. 2014. MRA Instruction. 218.
4 Defense Agency for Technology and Quality(DTAQ). 2017. Defense Quality Management Regulations.
5 Department of defense. Defense Acquisition University. 2003. Risk Management guide for DOD Acquisition. Fifth Edition(ver 2.0).
6 Ebeling, C. E. 1997. "An Introduction to Reliability and Maintainability Engineering." McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., Boston.
7 Emre, Celebi., Hassan, A., Kingravi Patricio A. Vela. 2013. "A comparative study of efficient initialization methods for the k-means clustering algorithm." Expert Systems with Applications 40(2013):200-210.   DOI
8 Erioli, Andrea 2005. "K-means Cluster Analysis and Mahalanobis Metrics: a problematic match or an overlooked opportunity." Statistica Applicata 17:61-73.
9 Finkelstein, Maxim, 2008. Introduction Failure Rate Modelling for Reliability and Risk. Springer Series in Reliability Engineering, 1-84.
10 ISO 31000. 2018. Risk Management Principles and Guidelines.
11 Kim, Y.S., and Choi, H.S. 2010. "Introduction to Defense Quality Management." Hyungseul: 101-116.
12 Lee, C.H., and Yang, K.W. 2014. "A Study on the Risk Identification Methods for Initial and Mass Production Stage of Military Products Using FMEA." J Korean Soc Qual Manag 42(3):311-324.   DOI
13 Lee, G.H. 1997. "A Study on Clustering Methods." Mokpho University:10-23.
14 Lee, J. H., Jung, Y. T. 2017. "A Study on the Methodology of Manufacturing Readiness Levels(MRLs) 8 of Manufacturing Readiness Assessment(MRA)." J Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society 18(6):609-619.   DOI
15 Seo, M.K., Yun, W. Y. 2017. "Clustering-based Monitoring and Fault detection in Hot Strip Roughing Mill." J Korean Soc Qual Manag. 45(1):25-38.   DOI
16 Seo, M.Y., Yun, W.Y. 2017. "Clustering-based Monitoring and Fault detection in Hot Strip Roughing Mill." J Korean Soc Qual Manag 45(1):025-038.   DOI
17 Shin, S.S., and Lee, K.S., Cho, H.G. 2013. "An Objective Method of Risk Assessment Based on Stochastic Modelling." J Korean Soc Qual Manag 41(3):465-474.   DOI
18 U.S. Department of Defense. 1998. MIL-HDBK-338B. Reliability Modeling and Prediction : Electronic Reliability Design Handbook.
19 Yoo, H.S., Kim. H.W., Sakong, C.D. 2017. "RAM analysis Report on ADC2A". ADD, ADC2A-RAMR V5.0.
20 Yoon, J.B., Ryu, S.H. 2016. "A Study on systematic performance of risk identification, risk assessment and risk treatment." DTAQ Technical Report:12-26.
21 MIL-STD-882D. 2000. Risk Management Guide for DoD Acquisition.