Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.7469/JKSQM.2017.45.3.365

An Empirical Study on the Quality Reliability of the Split Shape of Long Control Rod for the Rotorcraft  

Lim, HG (Defence Agency for Technology and Quality)
Kim, MT (Defence Agency for Technology and Quality)
Choi, JH (Defence Agency for Technology and Quality)
Kim, DH (Defence Agency for Technology and Quality)
Jang, MW (Defence Agency for Technology and Quality)
Yoon, JH (Hanwha Corporation/Machinery)
Publication Information
Journal of Korean Society for Quality Management / v.45, no.3, 2017 , pp. 365-377 More about this Journal
Abstract
Purpose: In the A rotorcraft, the division of a long yaw control rod was studied to improve the heat treatment capability. The purpose of this study was to analyze whether division of yaw control rod affects quality reliability in the A rotorcraft and analyze whether it secured flight safety. Methods: The structural static test and the vibration durability test on the split shape of yaw control rod were carried out in order to examine and verify the existing structural analysis results. Results: Structural static test results showed that there were no cracks and vibration durability test results showed that there was no damage or breakage on the split yaw control rod. Conclusion: This study showed that the quality reliability was confirmed and thus the flight safety of the A rotorcraft was secured. And it is expected that the split technique of the yaw control rod will contribute to the development of the rotorcraft industry in the future.
Keywords
MFCS; Quality Reliability; Split Yaw Control Rod; Structural Static Test; Vibration Durability Test;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 DAPA(Defense Acquisition Program Administration). 2012. Development Specification for KUH Mechanical Flight Control System. 88ZC4831_Rev D, 8-17.
2 MECAER AVN Group, 2015. Static Test Mechanical Flight Control System for KUH. TR-0000075_Rev B.
3 MECAER AVN Group. 2015. VIBRATION TEST (Hanwha Rod). TR-0000084_Rev B.
4 MECAER AVN Group. 2017. New Design Rod Y7. TN6-0000116_Rev E.
5 Korea Army Headquarters. 2013. TMK1(3)-1520-303-23(1/24), Helicopter Utility KUH-1, 2-58.
6 Robert Pizzo. 2015. Change Note 2015.0021 : HANHWA P/N A81025809-01-Re-Design.
7 SAE International. 2015. Aerospace Material Specification. AMS2770-Rev N.
8 SAE International. 2015. Aerospace Material Specification. AMS-S-8802-Rev D.
9 U.S Army. 1986. ADS-29_HDBK. Structural Design Criteria for Rotary Wing Aircraft.
10 U.S Army. 1996. ADS-51_HDBK. Rotorcraft and Aircraft Qualification(RAQ) HandBook, 3-13.
11 DAPA(Defense Acquisition Program Administration). 2012. Interpretation Report of KUH Mechanical Flight Control System. 88PR4836, 11, 38, 56.
12 DAPA(Defense Acquisition Program Administration). 2012. Qualification Test for KUH Mechanical Flight Control System. 88PP4838_Rev C, 17.
13 DoD(Department of Defense). 2000. Test Method standard for Environmental Engineering Consideration and alaboratory tests. MIL-STD-810F.