Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.7469/JKSQM.2013.41.4.683

Evaluating Customer Perceptions of Car Seats' Functions Using the Kano Model  

Kim, Hakgyun (Department of Management of Technology, Sungkyunkwan University)
Song, HaeGeun (Department of Industrial Engineering, Sungkyunkwan University)
Park, Young T. (Department of Management of Technology, Sungkyunkwan University)
Publication Information
Journal of Korean Society for Quality Management / v.41, no.4, 2013 , pp. 683-692 More about this Journal
Abstract
Purpose: Car seats affect customer satisfaction greatly when the seats' design is changed because car holders are in close contact with the seats. However, the improvement of the current seats' design involves risks such as investment cost, and therefore it needs strategic operating measures from the perspective of customers. Until now, operations of seats' specification have been decided by technical-push rather than market-pull, and carried out based on professionals' experience without measuring customer satisfaction correctly. The purpose of this study is to present a systematic approach to measure customers' perception on the car seats using the Kano model and pairwise comparison technique. Methods: The authors derive 17 major functions of a car seat by analyzing major components of car seats, and conduct a survey of 141 adults who hold a car(s). Results: The results show that consumers perceive the adjustable functions of front seats as must-be while the same functions for rear seats are perceived as attractive. In particular, motor operated functions for both front and rear seats increase customer satisfaction greatly if they are presented. Conclusion: This study shows that how much customer (dis)satisfaction will increase if a function of car seats (non)fulfilled, and therefore, the results of this study will provide practitioners and R&D personnel in new automobile seats development projects with useful information.
Keywords
The Kano Model; Quality Attributes; Car Seats; Customer Satisfaction;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 3  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Berger, C., Blauth, R., Boger, D., Bolster, C., Burchill, G., DuMouchel, W., Pouliot, F., Richter, R., Rubinoff, A., Shen, D., Timko, M., and Walden, D. 1993. "Kano's methods for understanding customer-defined quality." Center for Quality of Management Journal 2(4):2-36.
2 Farmer, C. M., Wells, J. K., and Lund, A. K. 2003. "Effects of head restraint and seat redesign on neck injury risk in rear-end crashes." Traffic injury prevention 4(2):83-90.   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Harrison, D. D., Harrison, S. O., Croft, A. C., Harrison, D. E., and Troyanovich, S. J. 2000. "Sitting biomechanics, part II: optimal car driver's seat and optimal driver's spinal model." Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics 23(1):37-47.   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Jang, H. Y., Song, H. G., and Park, Y-T. 2012. "Determining the importance values of quality attributes using ASC." Journal of Korean Society of Quality Management 40(4):589-98.   과학기술학회마을   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Kano, N., Seraku, N., Takahashi, F., and Tsjui, S. 1984. "Attractive quality and must-be quality." Hinshitsu 14(2):147-56.
6 Kim, M. H., Song, H. G., and Park, Y-T. 2013. "Comparing the questionnaires for classifying quality attributes in the Kano model." Journal of Korean Society of Quality Management 41(2):589-98.   과학기술학회마을   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Kim, Y. S., Park, Y. T., Suh, Y. H., Yoo, W. J., and Yoo, H. J. 1999. Total Quality Management. Park-Young-Sa.
8 Kolich, M. 2008. "A conceptual framework proposed to formalize the scientific investigation of automobile seat comfort." Applied Ergonomics 39(1):15-27.   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Lee, M. C., and Newcomb, J. F. 1997. "Appling the Kano methodology to meet customer requirements: NASA's microgravity science program." Quality Management Journal 4(3):95-106.
10 Lofgren, M., and Witell, L. 2008. "Two decades of using Kano's theory of attractive quality: a literature review." Quality Management Journal 15(1):59-75. ASQ.
11 Power, J. D. 2012. "2012 U.S. Seat Quality and Satisfaction Study Results." Accessed 08/22/2012. http://www.jdpower.com/content/study-auto/1Xmefin/2012-u-s-seat-quality-and-saisfaction-study-results.htm.
12 Saaty, T. L. 1977. "A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structure." Journal of Mathematical Psychology 15(3):234-81.   DOI
13 Song, H. G., and Park, Y-T. 2012. "Wordings of the Kano model's questionnaire." Journal of Korean Society of Quality Management 40(4):453-66.   DOI   ScienceOn
14 Vargo, S. L., Nagao, K., He, Y., and Morgan, F. W. 2007. "Satisfiers, Dissatisfiers, Criticals, and Neutrals: A Review of Their Relative Effects on Customer (Dis)Satisfaction." Academy of Marketing Science Review 11(2):1-13.