Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.7469/JKSQM.2013.41.2.277

The Moderating Effect of Individual Factors on Information Systems(IS) Success Model  

Lee, Dong-Jin (School of Management, Kyung Hee University)
Lee, Sang-Chul (Dept. of Business Administration, Korea Christian University)
Suh, Yung-Ho (School of Management, Kyung Hee University)
Publication Information
Journal of Korean Society for Quality Management / v.41, no.2, 2013 , pp. 277-288 More about this Journal
Abstract
Purpose: This study aims to analyze the success factors of information systems and the moderating effect of individual factors in mandatory environment. Methods: In order to test the model, a questionnaire survey is delivered from salespersons of an insurance company in Seoul, Korea. 200 questionnaires are finally analyzed. Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) is adopted to analyze the data and Smart PLS 2.0 is used for examining the moderator effect. Results: The extended model proposed in this paper adopted individual factors and examined their moderator effect among constructs. An empirical test is carried out accordingly in order to test the model proposed in this paper. The results reveal that individual factors (i.e. Computer Self-Efficacy, Anxiety, Personal Innovativeness in IT) have a significant moderating effect on individual performance in the environment of mandatory information system usage. Conclusion: This paper extended the research field of information system success model to information systems in mandatory environment regarding differences of individual factors.
Keywords
IS Success Model; Individual Factors; Moderating Effects; Mandatory Environment;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Harrison A. W., and Rainner, R. K. JR. 1992. "The Influence of I ndividual Differences o n Skill in E nd-User Computing." Journal of Management Information Systems 9(1):93-111.   DOI
2 Khalifa, M., and Liu, V. 2003. "Determinants of Satisfaction at Different Adoption Stages of Internet-Based Services." Journal of Association for Information System 4(5):206-32.
3 Krasner, H. 2000. "Ensuring e-business success by learning from ERP failures." IT Professional 2(1):22-7.
4 Lee, B. K., Kim J. J., and Ryu, L. 2009. "An Empirical Study on the Factors Influencing the Performance of Outbound Information System in Contact Center." The Journal of internet electronic commerce research 9(4):143-70
5 Limayem, M., Hirt, S. G., and Cheung, C. M. K. 2007. "How Habit Limits th Predictive Power of Intention: The Case of Information Systems Continuance." MIS Quarterly 31(4):705-37.   DOI
6 Lippke S., Wiedemann, A. U., Ziegelmann, J. P., Reuter, T., and Schwarzer, R. 2009. "Self-efficacy Moderates the Mediation of Intentions Into Behavior via Plans." American Journal of Health Behavior 33(5):521-29.
7 Nah, F. F. H., Tan, X., and The, S. H. 2004. "An Empirical Investigation on End-User's Acceptance of Enterprise Systems." Information Resources Management Journal 17(3):32-53.   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Rogers, E. M. 2003. Diffusion of Innovations. 5th(ed.). NewYork: Free Press.
9 Seddon, P. B., and Kiew, M. Y. 1994. "A Partial Test and Development of the DeLone and McLean Model of IS success." Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Systems, Vancouver, BC, Canada(ICIS 94):99-110.
10 Seddon, P. B. 1997. "A Respecification and Extension of the DeLone and McLean Mode of IS Success." Information Systems Research 8(3):240-53.   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Thatcher, J. B., and Perrewe, P. L. 2002. "An empirical examination of individual traits as antecedents to computer anxiety and computer self-efficacy." Mis Quarterly 26(4):381-96.   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Venkatesh, V., and Davis, F. D. 2000. "A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies." Management Science 46(2):186-204.   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., and Davis, F. D. 2003. "User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View." MIS Quarterly 27(3):425-78.   DOI
14 Wood, R. E., and Bandura, A. 1989. "Impact of Conceptions of Ability on Self-Regulatory Mechanisms and Complex Decision Making." Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 56(3):407-15.   DOI
15 Agarwal, R., and Prasad, J. 1998. "A Conceptual and Operational Definition of Personal Innovativeness in the Domain of Information Technology." Information Systems Research 9(2):204-15.   DOI   ScienceOn
16 Bagozzi, R. P., Richard P., and Yi, Y. 1998. "On the Evaluation of Structural Equation Models." Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 16(1):74-94.
17 Bandura, A. 1986. Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Congnitive Theory. Englewood Cliffs. NJ: Prentice-Hall.
18 Barker, T., and Frolick, M. N. 2003. "ERP implementation Failure: A case Study." Information Systems Management 20(4):43-49.   DOI   ScienceOn
19 Bhattacherjee, A. 2001. "Understanding Information Systems Continuance: An Expectation Confirmation Model." MIS Quarterly 25(3): 351-70.   DOI   ScienceOn
20 Ein-Dor, P., and Segev, E. 1978. "Organizational Context and the Success of Management Information Systems." Management Science 24(10):1067-77.
21 Gattiker, T. F., and Goodhue, D. L. 2005. "What Happens after ERP Implementation: Understanding the Impact of Interdependence and Differentiation on Plant-Level Outcomes." MIS Quarterly 29(3):559-85.   DOI
22 Chin, W. W., Marcolin, B. L., and Newsted, P. R. 2003. "A Partial Least Squares Latent Variable Modeling Approach for Measuring Interaction Effects: Results from a Monte Carlo Simulation Study and an Electronic-Mail Emotion/Adoption Study." Information Systems Research 14(2):189-217.   DOI   ScienceOn
23 Compeau, D. R., and Higgins, C. A. 1995. "Computer Self-Efficacy: Development of a Measure and Initial Test." MIS Quarterly 19(2):189-211.   DOI   ScienceOn
24 Daft, R. L., and Steers, R. M. 1986. "Organizations: A Micro/Macro Approach, Scott, Foresman and Company, Illinois." (Reprinted by Pang-Han Publishing Company, Seoul).
25 Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., and Warshaw, P. R. 1989. "User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models." Management Science 35(8):982-1003.   DOI   ScienceOn
26 Davis, F. D. , Bagozzi, R. P., and Warshaw, P. R. 1992. "Extrinsic and Intrinsic Motivation to Use Computers in the Workplace." Journal of Applied Social Psychology 22(14):1111-132.   DOI
27 DeLone, W. H., and McLean, E. R. 1992. "Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable." Information Systems Research 3(1):60-95.   DOI
28 DeLone, W. H., and McLean, E. R. 2003. "The DeLone and McLean Model of Information Systems Success: A ten-Year Update." Journal of Management Information Systems 19(4):9-30.   DOI
29 Gatian, A. W. 1994. "Is user satisfaction a v alid measure of system effectiveness." Information & Management 26(3):119-31.   DOI   ScienceOn
30 Guental, H. G., Surprenant, N., and Bubeck, K. 1984. "Effectively Utilizing Computer-Aided Design Technology: The Role of Individual Difference Variables." Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Information Systems 21-30.