1 |
Koksoy, Onur and Doganaksoy, Necip. 2003. "Joint Optimization of Mean and Standard Deviation Using Response Surface Methods." Journal of Quality Technology 35:239-252.
|
2 |
Lee, Dong-Hee, Jeong, In-Jun, and Kim, Kwang-Jae. 2010. "A Posterior Preference Articulation Approach to Dual-Response-Surface Optimization." IIE Transactions 42:161-171.
|
3 |
Lee, Dong-Hee, Kim, Kwang-Jae, and Kőksalan, Murrat. 2011. "A Posterior Preference Articulation Approach to Multiresponse Surface Optimization." European Journal of Operational Research 210:301-309.
DOI
|
4 |
Lee, Woo-Sun and Rheem, Sung-Sue. 2001. "Some 3-Level Spherical Designs for Response Surface Experiments: Designs Constructed for the Radius of the Spherical Experimental Region to Vary with the Number of Factors." Journal of the Korean Society for Quality Management 29:24-40.
과학기술학회마을
|
5 |
Lin, Dennis K. J. and Tu, Wanzhu. 1995. "Dual Response Surface Optimization." Journal of Quality Technology 27:34-39.
|
6 |
Miettinen, Kaisa. 2001. "Some Methods for Nonlinear Multi-Objective Optimization." Lecture Notes in Computer Science 1993:1-20.
|
7 |
Steuer, Ralph E. 1986. Multiple Criteria Optimization: Theory, Computation, and Application. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
|
8 |
Myers, Raymond. H., and Montgomery, Douglas. C. 2002. Response Surface Methodology (2nd ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
|
9 |
Rheem, Sung-Sue, and Lee, Woo-Sun. 2005. "Multiresponse Optimization in Response Surface Analysis: A Method by Minimization of Weighted Sum of Estimates of Expected Squared Relative Errors." Journal of the Korean Society for Quality Management 33:73-82.
과학기술학회마을
|
10 |
Shin, Sangmun and Cho, Byung Rae. 2006. "Robust Design Models for Customer-Specified Bounds on Process Parameters." Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering 15:2-18.
DOI
|
11 |
Tang, L. C., and Xu, K. 2002. "A Unified Approach for Dual Response Surface Optimization." Journal of Quality Technology 34:437-447.
|
12 |
Tind, Jorgen, and Wiecek, Margaret M. 1999. "Augmented Lagrangian and Tchebycheff Approaches in Multiple Objective Programming." Journal of Global Optimization 14:251-266.
DOI
|
13 |
Vining, G. Geoffrey, and Myers, Raymond H. 1990. "Combining Taguchi and Response Surface Philosophies: A Dual Response Approach." Journal of Quality Technology 22:38-45.
|
14 |
Haimes, Yacov Y., Lasdon, Leon S., and Wismer, David A. 1971. "On a Bicriterion Formulation of the Problems of Integrated System Identification and System Optimization." IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics 1:296-297.
DOI
|
15 |
Box, George E. P., and Draper, Norman R. 1987. Empirical Model Building and Response Surfaces. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
|
16 |
Carlyle, W. Matthew, Fowler, John W., Gel, Esma S., and Kim, Bosun. 2003. "Quantitative Comparison of Approximate Solution Sets for Bi-Criteria Optimization Problems." Decision Sciences 34:63-82.
DOI
|
17 |
Copeland, Karen A. F., and Nelson, Peter R. 1996. "Dual Response Optimization via Direct Function Minimization." Journal of Quality Technology 28:331-336.
|
18 |
Khuri, Andre I., and Cornell, John A. 1996. Response Surfaces: Designs and Analyses. New York: Dekker.
|
19 |
Hwang, Ching-Lai, Masud, Abu Syed Md. Masud, Paidy, Sudhakar R., and Yoon, Kwangsun. 1979. Multiple Objective Decision Making - Methods and Applications (Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
|
20 |
Jeong, In-Jun, Kim, Kwang-Jae, and Chang, Soo Y. 2005. "Optimal Weighting of Bias and Variance in Dual Response Surface Optimization." Journal of Quality Technology 37:236-247.
|
21 |
Kim, Kwang-Jae, and Lin, Dennis K. J. 1998. "Dual Response Surface Optimization: a Fuzzy Modeling Approach." Journal of Quality Technology 30:1-10.
|
22 |
Kim, Young-Jin. 2002. "Response Surface Approach to Integrated Optimization Modeling for Parameter and Tolerance Design." Journal of the Korean Society for Quality Management 30:58-67.
과학기술학회마을
|
23 |
Koksalan, M. Murrat, and Sagala, Paul N. S. 1995. "Interactive Approaches for Discrete Alternative Multiple Criteria Decision Making with Monotone Utility Functions." Management Science 41:1158-1171.
DOI
|