Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.7469/JKSQM.2012.40.4.481

An Iterative Posterior Preference Articulation Approach to Dual Response Surface Optimization  

Jeong, In-Jun (Department of Business Administration, Daegu University)
Publication Information
Journal of Korean Society for Quality Management / v.40, no.4, 2012 , pp. 481-496 More about this Journal
Abstract
Purpose: This paper aims at improving inefficiency of an existing posterior preference articulation method proposed for dual response surface optimization. The method generates a set of non-dominated solutions and then allows a decision maker (DM) to select the best solution among them through an interval selection strategy. Methods: This paper proposes an iterative posterior preference articulation method, which repeatedly generates the predetermined number of non-dominated solutions in an interval which becomes gradually narrower over rounds. Results: The existing method generates a good number of non-dominated solutions not used in the DM's selection process, while the proposed method generates the minimal number of non-dominated solutions necessitated in the selection process. Conclusion: The proposed method enables a satisfactory compromise solution to be achieved with minimal cognitive burden of the DM as well as with light computation load in generating non-dominated solutions.
Keywords
Response Surface Methodology; Dual Response Surface Optimization; Posterior Preference Articulation Approach; Iterative Approach;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 3  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Koksoy, Onur and Doganaksoy, Necip. 2003. "Joint Optimization of Mean and Standard Deviation Using Response Surface Methods." Journal of Quality Technology 35:239-252.
2 Lee, Dong-Hee, Jeong, In-Jun, and Kim, Kwang-Jae. 2010. "A Posterior Preference Articulation Approach to Dual-Response-Surface Optimization." IIE Transactions 42:161-171.
3 Lee, Dong-Hee, Kim, Kwang-Jae, and Kőksalan, Murrat. 2011. "A Posterior Preference Articulation Approach to Multiresponse Surface Optimization." European Journal of Operational Research 210:301-309.   DOI
4 Lee, Woo-Sun and Rheem, Sung-Sue. 2001. "Some 3-Level Spherical Designs for Response Surface Experiments: Designs Constructed for the Radius of the Spherical Experimental Region to Vary with the Number of Factors." Journal of the Korean Society for Quality Management 29:24-40.   과학기술학회마을
5 Lin, Dennis K. J. and Tu, Wanzhu. 1995. "Dual Response Surface Optimization." Journal of Quality Technology 27:34-39.
6 Miettinen, Kaisa. 2001. "Some Methods for Nonlinear Multi-Objective Optimization." Lecture Notes in Computer Science 1993:1-20.
7 Steuer, Ralph E. 1986. Multiple Criteria Optimization: Theory, Computation, and Application. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
8 Myers, Raymond. H., and Montgomery, Douglas. C. 2002. Response Surface Methodology (2nd ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
9 Rheem, Sung-Sue, and Lee, Woo-Sun. 2005. "Multiresponse Optimization in Response Surface Analysis: A Method by Minimization of Weighted Sum of Estimates of Expected Squared Relative Errors." Journal of the Korean Society for Quality Management 33:73-82.   과학기술학회마을
10 Shin, Sangmun and Cho, Byung Rae. 2006. "Robust Design Models for Customer-Specified Bounds on Process Parameters." Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering 15:2-18.   DOI
11 Tang, L. C., and Xu, K. 2002. "A Unified Approach for Dual Response Surface Optimization." Journal of Quality Technology 34:437-447.
12 Tind, Jorgen, and Wiecek, Margaret M. 1999. "Augmented Lagrangian and Tchebycheff Approaches in Multiple Objective Programming." Journal of Global Optimization 14:251-266.   DOI
13 Vining, G. Geoffrey, and Myers, Raymond H. 1990. "Combining Taguchi and Response Surface Philosophies: A Dual Response Approach." Journal of Quality Technology 22:38-45.
14 Haimes, Yacov Y., Lasdon, Leon S., and Wismer, David A. 1971. "On a Bicriterion Formulation of the Problems of Integrated System Identification and System Optimization." IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics 1:296-297.   DOI
15 Box, George E. P., and Draper, Norman R. 1987. Empirical Model Building and Response Surfaces. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
16 Carlyle, W. Matthew, Fowler, John W., Gel, Esma S., and Kim, Bosun. 2003. "Quantitative Comparison of Approximate Solution Sets for Bi-Criteria Optimization Problems." Decision Sciences 34:63-82.   DOI
17 Copeland, Karen A. F., and Nelson, Peter R. 1996. "Dual Response Optimization via Direct Function Minimization." Journal of Quality Technology 28:331-336.
18 Khuri, Andre I., and Cornell, John A. 1996. Response Surfaces: Designs and Analyses. New York: Dekker.
19 Hwang, Ching-Lai, Masud, Abu Syed Md. Masud, Paidy, Sudhakar R., and Yoon, Kwangsun. 1979. Multiple Objective Decision Making - Methods and Applications (Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
20 Jeong, In-Jun, Kim, Kwang-Jae, and Chang, Soo Y. 2005. "Optimal Weighting of Bias and Variance in Dual Response Surface Optimization." Journal of Quality Technology 37:236-247.
21 Kim, Kwang-Jae, and Lin, Dennis K. J. 1998. "Dual Response Surface Optimization: a Fuzzy Modeling Approach." Journal of Quality Technology 30:1-10.
22 Kim, Young-Jin. 2002. "Response Surface Approach to Integrated Optimization Modeling for Parameter and Tolerance Design." Journal of the Korean Society for Quality Management 30:58-67.   과학기술학회마을
23 Koksalan, M. Murrat, and Sagala, Paul N. S. 1995. "Interactive Approaches for Discrete Alternative Multiple Criteria Decision Making with Monotone Utility Functions." Management Science 41:1158-1171.   DOI