Browse > Article

Equivalence testing and its applications in industry  

Baik, Jai-Wook (Department of Information Statistics, Korea National Open University)
Publication Information
Abstract
As more and more data are collected one may ask whether the data collected within a short period of time are same. In this case traditional hypothesis testing of $H_o:{\mu}_1={\mu}_2$ vs $H_1:{\mu}_1{\neq}{\mu}_2$ is used to determine whether the data are same when there is no knowledge about equivalence testing. However, this type of hypothesis testing has the undesirable property of penalizing higher precision. So TOST is to be performed in the event of equivalence testing. In this study equivalence testing is introduced where one can find the applications in industry. Traditional two sample t testing is to be compared with the equivalent testing and the procedure to perform the equivalence testing is to be presented along with an example. Finally equivalence testing in terms of the other parameters such as variance, proportion or failure rate is to be sought.
Keywords
industrial statistics; equivalence testing; hypothesis testing; TOST;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Lamprecht, J.L., Applied Analysis for Process Improvement, 2005, ASQ Quality Press
2 Roy, T., Calibrated Nonparametric Confidence Sets, Journal of Mathematical Chemistry, 1997, 21, pp. 103-109   DOI
3 Stein, J. and Doganaksoy, N., Sample Size Consideration for Assessing the Equivalence of Two Process Means, Quality Engineering, 1999-2000, 12, pp. 105-110   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Rogers, J.L., Howard, K.I. and Vessey, J.T., Psychological Bulletin, 1993, 113, pp. 553-565   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Westlake, W.J., Response to T.B.L. Kirkwood: Bioequivalence Testing-A Need to Rethink, Biometrics, 1981, 37, pp. 589-594   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Allen I.E. and Seaman, C. A., Different, Equivalent or Both?, Quality Progress, July 2006, pp. 77-79
7 Schuirmann, D.J., A Comparison of the Two Onesided Tests Procedure and the Power Approach for Assessing the Equivalence of Average Bioavailability, Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics, 1987, 15 pp. 657- 680   DOI
8 Westlake, W.J., Symmetric Confidence Intervals for Bioequivalence Trials, Biometrics, 32, 1976, pp. 741-744   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Hauck, W. and Anderson, S., Type of Bioequivalence and Related Statistical Considerations. Journal of Clinical Phamacology, Therapy and Toxicology, 1992, 30, pp. 181-187
10 Metzler, C. M., Bioavailability. A Problem in Equivalence, Biometrics, 1974, 30. pp. 309-317   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Schuirmann, D.J., On Hypothesis Testing to Determine if the Mean of a Normal Distribution is Contained in a Known Interval, Biometrics, 1981, 37, p. 617