Browse > Article

Design of the Staircase Fatigue Tests for the Random Fatigue Limit Model  

Seo, Sun-Keun (Dept. of Industrial & Management Systems Engineering, Dong-A University)
Park, Jung-Eun (Pantos Logistics Co., Ltd)
Cho, You-Hee (Dept. of Industrial & Management Systems Engineering, Dong-A University)
Song, Suh-Il (Dept. of Industrial & Management Systems Engineering, Dong-A University)
Publication Information
Abstract
The fatigue has been considered the most failure mode of metal, ceramic, and composite materials. In this paper, numerical experiments to asses the usefulness of two Dixon's methods(small and large samples) and 14 S-N methods on assumptions of lognormal fatigue limit distribution under RFL(Random Fatigue Limit) model are conducted for staircase(or up-and-down) test and compared by MSE(Mean Squared Error) and bias for estimates of mean log-fatigue limit. Also, guidelines for staircase test plans to choose initial stress level and step size are recommended from numerical experiments including sensitivity analyses. In addition, the parametric bootstrap method to construct a confidence interval for the mean of log-fatigue limit by the percentile method using a transition probability matrix of Markov chain is presented and illustrated with an example.
Keywords
Fatigue Test; Staircase Test; Random Fatigue Limit Model; Bootstrap Method; 14 S-N Method;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Pascual, F. G. and Meeker, W. A.(1997), 'Analysis of Fatigue Data with Runouts Based on a Model with Nonconstant Standard Deviation and a Fatigue Limit Parameter', Journal of Testing and Evaluation, Vol. 25, pp. 292-301   DOI   ScienceOn
2 JSME(994), 統計的疲勞試險法(JSME S002), 개정판, 日本機械學會, 東京(日本)
3 Chao, M. T. and Fuh, C. D.(2001), 'Bootstrap Methods for the Up and Down Test on Pyrotechnics Sensitivity Analysis', Statistica Sinica, Vol. 11, pp. 1-21
4 Insightful(2001), S-Plus 6.2 for windows: User's Guide, Insightful Corp., Seattle(USA)
5 Nelson, W.(1984), 'Fitting of Fatigue Curves with Nonconstant Standard Deviation to Data with Runouts', Journal of Testing and Evaluation, Vol. 12, pp. 69-77   DOI
6 Neyer, B. T.(1994), 'A D-Optimality Based Sensitivity Test', Technometrics, Vol. 36, pp. 61-70   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Pascual, F. G.(2003), 'Theory for Optimal Test Plans for the Random Fatigue-Limit Model', Technometrics, Vol. 45, pp. 130-141   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Pascual, F. G. and Meeker, W. Q.(1999), 'Estimating Fatigue Curves with the Random Fatigue-Limit Model', Technometrics, Vol. 41, pp. 277-290   DOI
9 서순근, 조유희(2003), '피로곡선 모형의 통계적 분석 및 비교', 품질경영학회지, 31권, pp. 165-182   PUBMED
10 Dixon, W. J.(1965), 'The Up-and-Down Method for Small Samples', Journal of the American Statistical Association, Vol. 60, pp. 967-978   DOI
11 Pascual, F. G.(2004), 'Optimum Test Planing with the Random Fatigue-Limit Model Given the Fatigue-Limit Distribution', IEEE Transactions on Reliability, Vol. 33, pp. 284-292
12 Lassen, T., Darcis, P., and Recho, N.(2005), 'Fatigue Behavior of Welded Joints Part 1 - Statistical Methods for Fatigue Life Prediction', Welding Journal, Vol. 84, pp. 183-187
13 Maplesoft(2006), Maple 10 Learning Guide, Waterloo Maple Inc., Waterloo(Canada)
14 Loren, S. and Lundstrom. M.(2005), 'Modeling curved S-N curves', Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures, Vol. 28, pp. 437-443   DOI   ScienceOn
15 Loren, S.(2003), 'Fatigue Limit Estimated Using Finite Lives', Fatigue & Fracture Engineering Materials Structures, Vol. 26, pp. 757-766   DOI   ScienceOn
16 Brownlee, K. A., Hodges, J. L., Jr., and Rosenblatt, M.(1953), 'The Up-and-Down Method with Small Samples', Journal of the American Statistical Association, Vol. 48, pp. 262-277   DOI
17 Collins, J. A.(1994), Failure of Materials in Mechanical Design: Analysis, Prediction, Prevention, 2nd ed., John Wiley, New York(USA)
18 Meeker, W. A. and Escobar, L. A.(1998), Statistical Methods for Reliability Data, John Wiley and Sons, New York (USA)
19 Dixon, W. J. and Mood, A. M.(1948), 'A Method for Obtaining and Analyzing Sensitivity Data', Journal of the American Statistical Association, Vol. 43, pp. 109-126   DOI