Browse > Article

Selecting on the Preferred Alternatives of MADM with the­smaller­the­better or the­larger­the­better Characteristics using SN Ratios  

이강인 (전주대학교 공학부 산업공학)
Publication Information
Journal of Korean Society for Quality Management / v.31, no.4, 2003 , pp. 150-163 More about this Journal
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to propose an interactive method using the concept of Signal­to­Noise (SN) ratios and cutting ranges for selecting the most preferred alternatives of Multiple­attribute Decision­Making(MADM) with the­smaller­the­better or the­larger­the­better characteristics. In this method the decision makers could make a grouping of attributes by their priorities. This research is based on the assumption of an equality between the attributes of MADM with the characteristics of Taguchi method. As a result, this interactive method could transform the characteristic value of Taguchi method into the size of SN ratios which are relatively easy to understand by decision makers.
Keywords
Taguchi Method; Multiple­Criteria Decision Making(MCDM); Utility/ Value Functions(UVF);
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 박성현, 박영현(1995), 「통계적 품질관리」 ,민영사, pp.573-592
2 이강인, 서재훈, 오기영(2001), "SN비를 이용한 다혼합특성문제의 최적 선호대안 선정", '한국품질경영학회 춘계학술대회',pp.575-581
3 Korhonen, P. J.(1986), "A HierarchicalInteractive Method for RankingAlternatives with Multiple QualitativeCriteria", European JournaI of OperationaI Research, Vol. 24, pp.265-276   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Mareschal, B., and Brans, J. P.(1988),"(Geometrical Representations for MCDA",Europeon Journal of OperationaI Research, Vol.34, pp.69-77   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Peace, G. S.,(1993), Taguchi Method, Addison-Wesley, Inc. Australia
6 Wu, F.C.(2002), "Optimization of MultipleQuality Characteristics Based on PercentageReduction of Taguchi's Quality Loss"The International journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, Vol.20,pp.749-753   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Yang, J. B., and Singh, M. G.(1994), "AnEvidential Reasoning Approach for Multiple-Attribute Decision Making with Uncertainty", IEEE Transactions on System, Man, and Cybernetics, Vol.24,No.1, pp.1-16   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Hwang, C. L, and Yoon, K. S.(1981),"Multiple Attribute Decision Making",Lecture Notes in Economics andMathematioal Systems, Springer-Verlag,New York
9 Olson, D. L.(1996), Decision Aids for Selection Problems, Splinger-Verlag, NewYork
10 조성구, 이강인(1997), "퍼지 Choquet적분을이용한 다속성 의사결정문제의 최적 선호대안 결정", '대한산업공학회지', 제23권, 제4호, pp.635-643
11 Zanakis, H. Z. Solomon, A., Wishart, N.,Dublish, S.(1998), "Multi-Attribute DecisionMaking:A Simulation Comparison of Select Methods", European Journat of Operational Research, Vol.107, pp.507-529   DOI   ScienceOn
12 이강인, 조성구(1995), 선호종속을 허용하는다속성 의사결정문제의 대화형 접근방법",'한국경영과학회지', 제20권, 제2호, pp.61-76
13 Zeleny, M.(1982), MuItipte CriteriaDecision Making, Mcgraw-Hill Book Company, New York
14 이강인, 강인순(1998), "다구찌 방법을 이용한 망목특성의 선호설비 선택", '대한설비관리학회지' , 제3권, 제2호, pp.19-27
15 Valls, A., and Torra, V.(2000), "UsingClassification as an Aggregation Tool inMCDM", Fuzzy Sets and Systems, Vol.115, pp.159-168   DOI   ScienceOn
16 이강인, 이진식(1998), '혼합 다속성 의사결정문제에서 선호설비의 선정', '대한설비관리학회지' , 제3권, 제1호, pp.243-255
17 Barron, H., and Schmidt, C. P.(1988),"Sensitivity Analysis of AdditiveMuIti-attribute Value Models", Operations Research, Vol.36, pp.122-127   DOI   ScienceOn
18 Kackar, R. N.(1985), "Off-Line Quality Control, Parameter Design, and the Taguchi Method", JournaI of QuaIityTechnology, Vol.17, pp.21-29
19 Roy, R.(1990), A Primer on the Taguchi Method, Van Nostrand Reinhold, Inc.New York
20 이강인(1998), "다구찌의 손실함수를 이용한 다망목특성을 가지는 의사결정문제의 최적선호대안 결정", '대한산업공학회지', 제24권, 제4호, pp.493-502
21 Vansnik, J. C.(1986), "On the Problem of Weights in Multiple Chteria DecisionMaking(The Noncompensatory Approach)",Europeon Journal of Operational Research,Vol.24, pp.288-294   DOI   ScienceOn
22 Taguchi, G.(1986), Introduction to Quality Engineering, Asian Production Organization, Tokyo