Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.12815/kits.2019.18.1.91

Development of Quantitative Methods for Evaluating Failure Safety of Level 3 Autonomous Vehicles  

Kim, Dooyong (Graduate School of Automotive Engineering, Kookmin University)
Lee, Sangyeop (Graduate School of Automotive Engineering, Kookmin University)
Lee, Hyuckkee (Intelligent Vehicle Control System Research Center, Korea Automotive Technology Institute)
Choi, Inseong (Automated Vehicle Center, Korea Automobile Testing and Research Institute)
Shin, Jaekon (Automated Vehicle Center, Korea Automobile Testing and Research Institute)
Park, Kihong (Department of Automobile and IT Convergence, Kookmin University)
Publication Information
The Journal of The Korea Institute of Intelligent Transport Systems / v.18, no.1, 2019 , pp. 91-102 More about this Journal
Abstract
Autonomous vehicles can be exposed to severe danger when failure occurs in any of its components. For this reason many countries are making efforts on the legislative issue how to objectively evaluate failure safety of an autonomous vehicle when such a vehicle is commercially available to a customer in the near future. In level-3 automation, a driver must take over the control of his vehicle when failure occurs, and the driver's controllability must be secured for escape from the imminent danger. In this paper, quantitative methods have been developed for evaluating failure safety of the level-3 autonomous vehicle, and they were validated by simulation. And also, we confirmed that the proposed evaluation method can quantitatively evaluate the failure safety.
Keywords
Failure Safety; Autonomous Vehicle; Quantitative Evaluation Method;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 ISO(2014), "ISO 11270 Intelligent transport systems - lane keeping assistance systems -performance requirements and test procedures," International Standard, 1st Edn, pp.1-8.
2 Kang T., Kim D., Soh M., Jo H. J. H. and Park K.(2017), "Development Of The Lane Keeping Control System Using State-Varying Surface For Vulnerable Road Users," International Journal of Automotive Technology, vol. 19, no. 3, pp.489-498.   DOI
3 Kim D., Lee J., Lee H., Choi I., Shin J., Hong Y. and Park K.(2017), "Development of Fault Injection Simulation Environment for ADAS Systems and Case Studies of Fail-Safety Evaluation," Transactions of KSAE, vol. 25, no. 6, pp.767-777.   DOI
4 Noh K.(2013), Development of Driver Model Close to Human Driving Characteristics Based on Driver's Preview Distance and Neuromuscular Response Research, Ph. D. Dissertation. KAIST. Daejeon, Korea.
5 Park S., Jung H., Yun I., Shin S. and Kim J.(2017), "Suggestion for Autonomous Vehicle's Reaction when Drivers Can't React to Autonomous Vehicle's Take-over Requests," Korean Institute of ITS Conference, pp.179-182.
6 Alexander E. and Neville A. S.(2017), "Takeover Time in Highly Automated Vehicles_Noncritical Transitions to and From Manual Control, Human Factors," Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, vol. 59, no. 4, pp.689-705.   DOI
7 Han S., Kim T. and Kang K.(2016), "The Autonomous Vehicle policy I : US and Korea," Monthly KOTI Magazine on Transport, pp.74-79.
8 ISO(2009), "ISO 22179 Intelligent transport systems - full speed range adaptive cruise control (FSRA) systems - performance requirements and test procedures," International Standard, 1st Edn, pp.1-20.
9 ISO(2011), "ISO 26262-5 Road vehicle Functional Safety Part 3: Concept phase," 1st Edn, pp.1-16.