Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.12815/kits.2018.17.2.128

Potential Safety Benefit Analysis of Cooperative Driver Assistance Systems Via Vehicle-to-vehicle Communications  

Kang, Ji woong (Dept. of Mechanical Eng., Ajou Univ.)
Song, Bongsob (Dept. of Mechanical Eng., Ajou Univ.)
Publication Information
The Journal of The Korea Institute of Intelligent Transport Systems / v.17, no.2, 2018 , pp. 128-141 More about this Journal
Abstract
In this paper, a methodology to analyze the potential safe benefit of six cooperative driver assistance systems via V2V (vehicle-to-vehicle) communications is proposed. Although it is quite necessary to assess social impact with respect to new safety technologies for cooperative vehicles with V2V communications, there are few studies in Korea to predict the quantitative safety benefit analysis. In this study, traffic accident scenarios are classified based on traffic fatality between passenger cars. The sequential collision type is classified for a multiple pile-up with respect to collision direction such as forward, side, head-on collisions. Then movement of surrounding vehicle is considered for the scenario classification. Next, the cooperative driver assistance systems such as forward collision warning, blind spot detection, and intersection movement assistance are related with the corresponding accident scenarios. Finally, it is summarized how much traffic fatality may be reduced potentially due to the V2V communication based safety services.
Keywords
cooperative driver assistance system; vehicle-to-vehicle communication; safety benefit analysis; traffic accident analysis system;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Chalmers(2013), "iGLAD Codebook of the common data scheme," pp.7-49.
2 European Commission(2011), Specifications for scenario definitions, pp.8-28.
3 Jeong E. B. and Oh C.(2013), "Methodology for estimating safety benefits of advanced driver assistant systems," The Journal of The Korea Institute of Intelligent Transportation Systems, vol. 12, no. 3, pp.65-77.   DOI
4 Jeong E. B. and Oh C.(2017), "Evaluating the effectiveness of active vehicle safety systems," Accident Analysis & Prevention, vol. 100, pp.85-96.   DOI
5 Kang J. W., Lee J. M. and Song B. S.(2017), "A Study on Evaluation for a Forward Collision Warning System Based on V2V Communication," The Korean Society of Automotive Engineers 2017 Annual Spring Conference, vol. 2017, no. 5, pp.737-739.
6 Korea Road Traffic Authority(2017), http://www.koroad.or.kr, 2017. 08. 28.
7 Kuehn M., Hummel T. and Bende J.(2009), "Benefit estimation of advanced driver assistance systems for cars derived from real-life accidents," International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles(ESV), Paper No. 09-0317.
8 Lee J. M., Kang J. W. and Song B. S.(2017), "A Scenario Analysis of Intersection Movement Assistance via Accident Analysis at Intersection," The Korean Society of Automotive Engineers 2017 Annual Spring Conference, vol. 2017, no. 5, pp.602-603.
9 Li T. and Kockelman K. M.(2016), "Valuing the safety benefits of connected and automated vehicle technologies," Transportation Research Board 95th Annual Meeting, pp.1-18.
10 MarkVollrath, Schleicher S. and Gelau C.(2011), "The influence of cruise control and adaptive cruise control on driving behaviour - a driving simulator study," Accident Analysis & Prevention, vol. 43, pp.1134-1139.   DOI
11 National Highway Traffic Safety Administration(2007), "Pre-crash scenario typology for crash avoidance research," pp.1-13.
12 McLaughlin S. B., Hankey J. M. and Dingus T. A.(2008), "A method for evaluating collision avoidance systems using naturalistic driving data," Accident Analysis & Prevention, vol. 40, pp.8-16.   DOI
13 Moon S., Moon I. and Yi K.(2009), "Design, tuning, and evaluation of a full-range adaptive cruise control system with collision avoidance," Accident Analysis & Prevention, vol. 17, pp.442-455.
14 National Highway Traffic Safety Administration(2003), "Analysis of light vehicle crashes and pre-crash scenarios based on the 2000 general estimates system," pp.1-24.
15 National Highway Traffic Safety Administration(2011), Vehicle safety communication-applications (VSC-A), pp.1-29.
16 National Highway Traffic Safety Administration(2013), "Description of priority light-vehicle pre-crash scenario for safety applications based on vehicle-to-vehicle communications," pp.1-12.
17 National Highway Traffic Safety Administration(2013), "Evaluation of CIB system susceptibility to non-threatening driving scenarios on the test track," pp.1-21.
18 Page Y., Hermitte T., Chauvel C., Van Elslande P., Hill J., Kirk A., Hautzinger H., Schick S., Hell W., Alexopolous K., Pappas M. and Barrios J.(2009), "Reconsidering accident causation analuysis and evaluating the safety benefit of technologies: final results of the trace project," International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles(ESV), Paper No. 09-0148.
19 Ryu B. Y., Choi J. E. and Bae S. H.(2009), "An analysis of economic evaluation related to lane departure warning system," The Journal of The Korea Institute of Intelligent Transportation Systems, vol. 8, no. 5, pp.85-97.
20 Song B. S. and Kang J. W.(2017), "A Study on safety benefit analysis of cooperative driver assistance systems based on vehicle-to-vehicle communications," The 2017 Korean Institute of ITS Conference, vol. 2017, no. 4, pp.206-208.
21 Staubach M.(2009), "Factors correlated with traffic accidents as a basis for evaluating advanced driver assistance systems," Accident Analysis & Prevention, vol. 41, pp.1025-1033.   DOI
22 National Highway Traffic Safety Administration(2016), "Commercial connected vehicle test procedure development and test results - forward collision warning," pp.1-41.