Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.7472/jksii.2019.20.4.63

Process Governance Meta Model and Framework  

Lee, JungGyu (KCA)
Jeong, Seung Ryul (Graduate School of Business IT, Kookmin University)
Publication Information
Journal of Internet Computing and Services / v.20, no.4, 2019 , pp. 63-72 More about this Journal
Abstract
As a sub-concept of corporate or organization governance, business governance and IT governance have become major research topics in academia. However, despite the importance of process as a construct for mediating the domain between business and information technology, research on process governance is relatively inadequate. Process Governance focuses on activities that link business strategy with IT system implementation and explains the creation of corporate core values. The researcher studied the basic conceptual governance models of political science, sociology, public administration, and classified governance styles into six categories. The researcher focused on the series of metamodels. For examples, the traditional Strategy Alignment Model(SAM) by Henderson and Venkatraman which is replaced by the neo-SAM model, organizational governance network model, sequential organization governance model, organization governance meta model, process governance CUBE model, COSO and process governance CUBE comparison model, and finally Process Governance Framework and etc. The Major difference between SAM and neo-SAM model is Process Governance domain inserted between Business Governance and IT Governance. Among several metamodels, Process Governance framework, the core conceptual model consists of four activity dimensions: strategic aligning, human empowering, competency enhancing, and autonomous organizing. The researcher designed five variables for each activity dimensions, totally twenty variables. Besides four activity dimensions, there are six driving forces for Process Governance cycle: De-normalizing power, micro-power, vitalizing power, self-organizing power, normalizing power and sense-making. With four activity dimensions and six driving powers, an organization can maintain the flexibility of process governance cycle to cope with internal and external environmental changes. This study aims to propose the Process Governance competency model and Process Governance variables. The situation of the industry is changing from the function-oriented organization management to the process-oriented perspective. Process Governance framework proposed by the researcher will be the contextual reference models for the further diffusion of the research on Process Governance domain and the operational definition for the development of Process Governance measurement tools in detail.
Keywords
Process Governance; Organization Governance; Corporate Governance; Framework; IT Governance; Strategic Alignment Model; Business Governance;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 J. C. Henderson & N. Venkatraman, "Strategic alignment: Leveraging information technology for transforming organization", IBM Systems Journal, Vol. 32. No.1, 1993. https://doi.org/10.1147/SJ.1999.5387096
2 Ralf Muller, Project Governance, A Gower Book, pp.1, 2014.
3 박경귀, "사이버네틱스 이론의 검토와 사회과학에의 적용가능성", 한국정책평가연구원, 2003. http://www.kipe.re.kr/board/download/Cybernetics.pdf
4 B. Guy Peters, The Future of Governing(Studies in Government & Public Policy), University Press of Kansas, 2001.
5 김근세, "국정관리체계의 갈등: 정부조직관리개혁을 중심으로", 한국행정학회 하계학술대회, 서울, 2000.
6 전대성, "지방행정의 새로운 접근방법: 통치양식이론을 중심으로", 한국행정학회 동계 학술대회, 1997.
7 박재욱 & 류현욱, "로컬 거버넌스와 시장의 리더십", 한국행정학회 하계학술대회 발표논문, 2000.
8 김석준, "한국 국가재창조와 뉴 거버넌스: 새로운 패러다임의 모색, 한국행정학보, Vol. 34, No. 1, pp. 1-21, 2000. http://www.dbpia.co.kr/Article/NODE06707737
9 이명석, 거버넌스 이론의 모색, 국정관리연구, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 36-63, 2006..
10 라미경, "거버넌스 연구의 현재적 쟁점", 한국거버넌스학회보, Vol. 16, No. 3, pp. 91-107, 2009. http://www.dbpia.co.kr/Article/NODE01318378
11 James N. Rosenau, "Governance, Order, and Changes in World Politics," Governance without Government: Order and Change in World Politics, Cambridge University Press, pp.1-29, 1992.
12 R. Rhodes, Understanding Governance: Policy Networks, Governance, Reflexity and Accountability, Bristol, Open University Press, 1997.
13 World Bank, Reforming Public Institutions and Strengthening Governance, 2000.
14 L. Jr. Lynn et al., Improving Governance: A New Logic for Empirical Research, Georgetown University Press, 2001.
15 G. Stoker, Governance as Theory: Five Propositions, International Social Science Journal, Vol. 50, No. 1, pp. 17-28, 1998. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2451.00106   DOI
16 문순홍, 정규호, "생태근대화론을 활용한 환경정책의 지속가능성 평가 기본모형 연구", 환경정책, Vo. 8, No. 1, pp. 113-131, 2000.
17 M. Roderick et al., "Evaluating Chicago's Efforts to End Social Promotion," (in)Governance and Performance: New Perspectives, Georgetown University Press, 2000.
18 김정렬, "정부의 미래와 거버넌스: 신공공관리와 정책네트워크", 한국행정학보, Vol. 34, No. 1, pp. 21-29, 2000.
19 배응환, "지방정부와 지방환경 NGO관계: 개발논리에 대한 환경보존논리의 대응을 중심으로", 한국행정학보, Vol. 36, No. 1, pp. 253-274, 2002.
20 B. Jessop, "The Governance of complexity and the complexity of governance: preliminary remarks on some problems and limits of economic guidance,in Ash Amin and Jerzy Hausner, Beyond Market and Hierarchy: Interactive Governance and Social Complexity. Lyme, Edward Elgar, pp95-128, 1997.
21 E. Ostrom, "An Agenda for the Study of Institutions", Public Choice, Vol. 48, No. 1, pp. 3-25, 1986. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00239556   DOI
22 J. Kooiman, Societal Governance: Levels, Modes, and Orders of Social-Political Interaction, in Pierre, J. (ed.). Debating Governance. Oxford University Press, 2000.
23 M. S. Lee, "Conceptualizing the New Governance: A New Institution of Social Coordination", Presented at the Institutional Analysis and Development Mini-Conference, Workshop in Political Theory and Policy Analysis, Indiana Univ., 2003.
24 J. G. Lee, "Process Governance: Framework and Measurement", PhD Thesis, Kookmin University, pp. 39, 2018.
25 Sun Myung Hwang, "Process Quality Levels of ISOIEC 15504, CMMI and K-model", International Journal of Software Engineering and its Application, Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 33-42, 2009. https://www.earticle.net/Article/A103729
26 Marshall W. Meyer, "Finding performance: The new discipline in management", (in) Business performance measurement, Cambridge University Press, pp. 54, 2002.
27 A. Braganza & R. Lambert, "Strategic Integration: Developing a Process-Governance Framework", Knowledge and Process Management, Vol. 7, No. 3, pp. 177-186, 2000.   DOI
28 PMBOK 6th edition, PMI, 2017.
29 J. G. Lee and et al., "Process Governance Framework", 2018 Fall Conference, KSII, Vol.19, No.2, pp.149-150, 2018.
30 Andrea Sojova et al., "Business Process Performance Management Principles used in Slovak Enterprise", Procedia-Social and Behavioral Science, Vol. 109, pp. 276-280, 2014.   DOI
31 G.A. Rummler and A.P. Brache, Improving Performance, Jossey-Bass, 1995.
32 Terje Berg, "A Compass for Teaching Enterprise Governance", Accounting Education, Vol. 24, No. 6, pp. 559-563, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1080/09639284.2015.1108776   DOI
33 J. G. Lee and et al., "A Systematic Review for a Meta Model of the Process Governance: Constituents and Metrics for neo-Strategic Alignment Model in Process Governance Domain", 2018 Spring Conference, Vol.19, No. 1, 2018.
34 Chris Edwards & Joe Peppard, "Operationalizing Strategy Through Process", Long Range Planning, Vol. 30, No. 5. pp. 753-767, 1997. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0024-6301(97)00056-3   DOI
35 Gilles Deleuze, Foucault, University of Minnesota Press, 1988.
36 배응환, "참여 거버넌스와 지역NGO의 역할: 정책참여를 중심으로", NGO연구, Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 113-152, 2007.
37 J. Kooiman, Societal-Political Governance: Introduction. in J. Kooiman. ed. Modern Governance: New Government-Society Interactions. London: Sage, 1993.
38 Brenda Dervin, "Sense-making theory and practice: an overview of user interests in knowledge seeking and use", Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol. 2, No.2, 1998. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673279810249369
39 Harrison Owen, The Power of Spirit: How Organizations Transform, Berrett-Koehler Publishers, 2000.
40 Stuart A. Kaufmann, Reinventing the Sacred, Basic Books, 2010.
41 윤지선, "들뢰즈와 가따리의 '천개의 고원' 용어 분석론", 철학논집, Vol. 43, pp. 259-284, 2015. https://doi.org/10.17325/sgjp.2015.43..259
42 Kholod Alsufiani and et al., "Towards an instrument for measuring sensemaking and an assessment of its theoretical features", Proceedings of British HCI, 2017. https://doi.org/10.14236/ewic/HCI2017.86
43 최진석, 탁월한 사유의 시선, 21세기북스, pp. 190-229, 2017.
44 Robert Sasso and Arnaud Villani, Le Vocabulaire de Gilles Deleuze(Korean Edition), Galmuri, 2015.
45 고쿠분 고이치로/박철은 역, 고쿠분 고이치로의 들뢰즈 제대로 읽기, 도서출판 동아시아, pp. 226-229, 2015.
46 COSO, Enterprise Risk Management -Integrated Framework: Executive Summary, The Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission, 2004.
47 COSO, Internal Control -Integrated Framework: Executive Summary,The Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission, 2013.