Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.7472/jksii.2015.16.4.83

Effect of Trust Toward Digital Risk Management Organization on Risk Perception and Cognition of Risk Management: Focused on Expert Survey  

Kim, Won-je (College of Social Sciences, Sungkyunkwan University)
Kim, Chan-won (SSK Risk Communication Center, Sungkyunkwan University)
Publication Information
Journal of Internet Computing and Services / v.16, no.4, 2015 , pp. 83-91 More about this Journal
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of trust toward digital risk management organization on risk perception and cognition of risk management focused on expert survey. The results were as follows. First, Trust toward digital risk management organization influenced negatively on risk perception. Second, Trust toward digital risk management organization influenced positively on cognition of risk management organization. Third, risk perception on digital risk influenced not significantly on cognition of risk management organization. Findings of this study requires an effort to increase trust of digital risk management organization and to develop trust-based decision-making on digital risk.
Keywords
digital risk; trust; risk perception; risk management; expert;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 M. R. Greenberg, and K. Lowrie, "From the Very Public to the Less Known," Risk Analysis, Vol.29, No.2, 2009, pp.157-158.   DOI
2 Young-Ai Lee, and Na-Keung Lee, "Psychological Dimensions of Risk Perception for the Korean," PMORP Workshop, 2005, pp.1-12. http://www.riss.kr/search/download/FullTextDownload.do?control_no=4812c62a746d512fffe0bdc3ef48d419&p_mat_type=1a0202e37d52c72d&p_submat_type=&fulltext_kind=&t_gubun=undefined&DDODFlag=&redirectURL=%2Fsearch%2Fdownload%2FFullTextDownload.do&loginFlag=0&url_type=&query=Psychological+Dimensions+of+Risk+Perception+for+the+Korean
3 Hang-Min Cho, "Introduction of Digital Media and Consequent New Risk Types: Focus on the Analysis of User Risk Perception and Risk Features of Smart Phones as Convergence Media", The Journal of Korea Contents, Vol.11, No.8, 2011, pp.353-364. http://www.dbpia.co.kr/Journal/ArticleDetail/1509670
4 Bo-yun, Seo, "A Study on the Risk Communication in Digital Society", Doctoral Dissertation, The Graduate School of Chung-Ang University.
5 C. Roth and M. Siegrist, "Cyber Threat in the Field CIP: Trust and Perception", CRN: Zurich, Univ. of Zurich, 2001.
6 Dong-Kyoo Sung, Doo-hee Kim, Yoon-Suk Lee, and Seong-Won Lim, "A Study on the Cyber-Violence Induction Factors of Teenagers: Focused on Individual Inclination, Cyber Violence Damage Experience, and Moral Consciousness," Journal of Cybercommunication Academic Society, No.19, 2006, pp.79-129. http://www.dbpia.co.kr/Journal/ArticleDetail/886168
7 Cyber Bureau, 2015, http://www.netan.go.kr/prevention/sub2.jsp?mid=010201
8 Hae-Ryong Song, Hang-Min Cho, Yoon-Kyung Lee, and Won-Je Kim, "A Study on the Conceptualization, Structural Analysis and Domain Establishment of Risk Communication," Dispute Resolution Studies Review, Vol.10, No.1, 2012, pp.65-100.   DOI
9 V. T. Covello, D. McCallum, and M. T. Pavolva, "Effective Risk Communication", New York: London, 1989.
10 Hae-Ryong Song, Won-Je Kim, and Chan-Won Kim, "A Study on Public's Credibility, Risk Perception and Effectiveness of Nuclear Power Plant", Korean Review of Crisis & Emergency Management, Vol.11, No.4, 2005, pp.123-140, http://www.earticle.net/Article.aspx?sn=247480
11 T. C. Earle and M. Siegrist, "Morality Information, Performance Information, and the Distinction between Trust and Confidence", Journal of Applied Social Psychology, Vol.36, 2006, pp.383-416. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.0021-9029.2006.00012.x/abstract;jsessionid=7331D2274E7B7F81ABE504CA08CE066E.f03t02?userIsAuthenticated=false&deniedAccessCustomisedMessage=false   DOI
12 P. Slovic, "Perceived Risk, Trust and Democracy," Risk Analysis, Vol.13, No.6, 1993, pp.675-682. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1993.tb01329.x/abstract   DOI
13 M. Siegrist, and G. Cvetkovich, "Perception of Hazards: The Role of Social Trust and Knowledge," Risk Analysis, Vol.20, 2000, pp.713-719. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11110217   DOI
14 V. H. M. Visshcers and M. Siegrist, "How a Nuclear Power Plant Accident Influence Acceptance of Nuclear Power: Results of Longitudinal Study Before and After the Fukushima Disaster", Risk Analysis, Vol.33, 2013, pp.333-347. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22762151   DOI
15 T. C. Earle, "Trust in Risk Management: A Model-Based Review of Empirical Research," Risk Analysis, Vol.30, No.4, 2010, pp.541-574. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20522197   DOI
16 D. M. Rousseau, S. B. Sitkin, R. S. Burt, and C. Camerer, "Not so different after all: A Cross-Discipline View of Trust," Academy of Management Review, Vol.23, 1998, pp.393-404. http://amr.aom.org/content/23/3/393.short   DOI
17 M. Siegrist, "The Influence of Trust and Perception of Risk and Benefits on the Acceptance of Gene Technology," Risk Analysis, Vol.20, 2000, pp.195-204. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10859780   DOI
18 Young-Ai Lee, and Hea-Sook Lim, "The Effects of Trust and World views on Risk Perception," PMORP Workshop, 2005, pp.13-26.
19 Hea-Sook Lim, and Young-Ai Lee, "The Public Perception of Risk from Gene Technology," PMORP Workshop, 2005, pp.47-60. http://www.riss.kr/search/download/FullTextDownload.do?control_no=ec2c5ada88498d25ffe0bdc3ef48d419&p_mat_type=1a0202e37d52c72d&p_submat_type=&fulltext_kind=&t_gubun=undefined&DDODFlag=&redirectURL=%2Fsearch%2Fdownload%2FFullTextDownload.do&loginFlag=0&url_type=&query=The+Public+Perception+of+Risk+from+Gene+Technology
20 G. Cvetkovich, "The Attribution of Social Trust," In G. Cvetkovich and R. Lofstedt (Eds.), Social Trust and the Management of Risk. London: Earthscan, 1999.
21 G. Wachinger, O. Renn, C. Begg, and C. Kuhlicke, "The Risk Perception Paradox: Implications for Governance and Communication of Natural Hazards," Risk Analysis, Vol.33, No.6, 2013, pp.1049-1065. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01942.x/abstract   DOI
22 M. Siegrist, G. T. Cvetkovich, and C. Roth, "Salient Value Similarity, Social Trust, and Risk/Benefit Perception," Risk Analysis, Vol.20, No.3, 2000, pp.353-362. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/0272-4332.203034/abstract   DOI
23 M. G. Morgan, B. Fischhoff, A. Bostrom, and A. Atman, "Risk Communications: A Models Approach," Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press, 2001.
24 P. Slovic, "Perception of risk," Science, Vol.236, 1987, pp.280-285.   DOI
25 A. Knight, "Intervening Effects of Knowledge, Morality, Trust and Benefits on Support for Animal and Plant Biotechnology Applications," Risk Analysis, Vol.27, No.6, 2007, pp.1553-1563. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18093052   DOI
26 G. Song, "Understanding Public Perception of Benefits and Risk of Childhood Vaccinations in the United States," Risk Analysis, Vol.34, No.3, 2014, pp.410-426. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24033739
27 Hak-Sik Lee and Ji-Hoon Lim, "Structural Equation Model Analysis and Amos 20.0," Seoul: JypHyuJae Publishing Co, 2013.