Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.7472/jksii.2013.14.6.95

Performance of Collaboration Activities upon SME's Idiosyncrasy  

Lee, Hye Sun (Management of Technology, Graduate School of Yonsei University)
Oh, Junseok (Communications Policy Research Center, Yonsei University)
Lee, Jaeki (CTCC-Commercialization Support Team, ETRI(SME Support Team))
Lee, Bong Gyou (Graduate School of Information, Yonsei University)
Publication Information
Journal of Internet Computing and Services / v.14, no.6, 2013 , pp. 95-105 More about this Journal
Abstract
Recently, SME's Collaboration activities have become one of a vital factor for sustaining competitive edge. This is because of the rapidly changing and competitive market environment, and also to leverage performance by overcoming obstacles of having limited internal resources. Discussing about the effects and relationships of the firm's collaboration activities and its outputs are not new. However, as ICT and various technologies have been diffused into the traditional industries, boundaries and practice capabilities within the industries are becoming ambiguous. Thus contents of the products/services and their development methods are also go and come over the industries. Although many researchers suggested the relations of SME's collaboration activities and innovation performances, most of the previous literatures are focusing on broad perspectives of firm's environmental factors rather than considering various SME's idiosyncrasy factors such as their major product and customer types at once. Therefore, the purpose of this paper is to analyze how SME(Small Medium Enterprise)'s external collaboration activities by their idiosyncrasy act as an input to types of innovation performance. In order to analyze collaboration effects in detail, we defined factors that can represent the SME's business environment - Perceived importance of using external resources, Perceived importance of external partnership, Collaboration and Collaboration levels of Major Product types, Customer types and lastly the Firm Sizes. We have also specifically divided the performance of innovation types as product innovation and process innovation based on existing research. In this study, the empirical analysis is based on Probit Regression Model to observe the correlations with the impact of each SME's business environment and their activities. For the empirical data, 497 samples were collected which, this sample data was extracted from the 'Korean Open Innovation Survey' performed by ETRI(Korean Electronics Telecommunications Research Institute) in 2010. As a result, empirical test results indicated that the impact of collaboration varies depend on the innovation types (Product and Process Innovation). The Impact of the collaboration level for the product innovation tend to be more effective when SMEs are developing for a final product, targeting on for individual customers (B2C). But on the other hand, the analysis result of the Process innovation tend to be higher than the product innovation, when SMEs are developing raw materials for their partners or to other firms targeting on for manufacturing industries(B2B). Also perceived importance of using external resources has effected to both product and process innovation performance. But Perceived importance of external partnership was statistically insignificant. Interesting finding was that the service product has negative effects on for the process innovation performance. And Relationship between size of the firms and their external collaboration activities with their performance of the innovations indicated that the bigger firms(over 100 of employees) tend to have better for both product and process innovations. Finally, implications of the results can be suggested as performance of innovation can be varied depends on firm's unique business idiosyncrasy as well as levels of external collaboration activities. The Implication of this research can be considered for firms in selecting an appropriate strategy as well as for policy makers.
Keywords
SME's Innovation Performance; Collaboration; Product Innovation; Process Innovation; Probit Regression Model;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 3  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Gemunden & Heydebreck(1995): "The External Links and Networks of Small Firms - Their Role and Nature", in Globalisation. Networking, and Small Firms Innovation. D. O'Doherty (ed.), London: Graham & Trotman (forthcoming).
2 Rogers, M. "Networks, Finn Size and Innovation", Small Business Economics 22, 141-153. 2004   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Freel, M. S. "Patterns of Innovation and Skills in Small Firms", Technovarion 25, 123-134. 2005   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Eisenhardt KM, Schoonhoven CB. "Resource-based View of Strategic Alliance Formation: Strategic and Social Explanations in Entrepreneurial Firms". Organization Science 7(2): 136-150. 1996   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Kurokawa, S. "Make-or-buy decisions in R&D: small technology based firms in the United States and Japan". Engineering Management, IEEE Transactions on, 44(2): 124 -134. 1997   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Hyunho Kim et al, "Report on the Korean Innovation Survey 2008: Manufacturing Sector" STEPI 2008-81
7 Jaemin Park, Jungmann Lee, "How Do Firms" Innovation Behaviors Affect their Outputs in Korea?", International JOURNAL OF CONTENTS, 11(3), pp 239-350, 2011   과학기술학회마을   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Santamaria L. M., Garcia and J. Rialp, "Caracterizacion de las empresas que colaboran en centros tecnologicos". Departamento de Economia de la Empresa, Documents de treball 2002/5.
9 Belderbos, R., M. Carre and B. Lokshin, "Complementarity in R&D cooperation strategies". Review of Industrial Organization, 28 (4), 401-426. 2004
10 Applied Choice Analysis: A Primer. (Hensher, Rose and Greene, Cambridge University. Press 2005).
11 Parkhe, A. 'Strategic alliance structuring, a game theoretic and transaction cost examination of interfirm cooperation'. Academy of Management Journal, 36, pp. 794 - 829. 1993   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Beckeikh, N., Landry, R., Amara, N., "Lessons from innovation empirical studies in the manufacturing sector: a systematic review of the literature from 1993-2003". Technovation 26, pp. 644-664 2006   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Galende, J., and M. de la Fuente. "Internal Faetors Determining a Firm's Innovative Behaviour", Research Policy 32, 715-736. 2003   DOI   ScienceOn
14 Veugelers, R., and B. Cassiman, "Make and Buy in Innovation Strategies: Evidence from BeIgian Manufacturing Firms", Research Policy 28, 63-80. 1999   DOI   ScienceOn
15 Segu Oh, Hoon Kim, Junseok Seo, "Building ICE (Integrated collaboration environment) between companies in supply chain and Corporate Performance", Management Economics Research, 34(1), pp.83-100, 2011
16 Chi-Soo Ahn, Young-Duck Lee, "An Empirical Analysis of the Influence Factors on Open Innovation Activities in Korea", Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society, 14(3), pp.431-465, 2011   과학기술학회마을
17 Van de Vrande, V. de Jong, J.P.J., Vanhaverbeke, W. and de Rochemont, M. "Open innovation in SMEs: Trends, motives and management challenges", Technovation 29, pp.423-437, 2009   DOI   ScienceOn
18 Hewitt-Dundas, N, "Resouree and Capability Constraints to Innovation in Small and Large Plants," Small Business Economics 26, 257-277. 2006   DOI
19 Jong-woon Kim, "The Effects of External Collaborations on the Innovation Performance of Korean Venture Businesses", Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society, 15(3), pp.533-556, 2012   과학기술학회마을
20 R. Rothwell. "Innovation and Firm Size: A Case of Dynamic Complementary; Or Is Small Really Beautiful?", Journal of General Management, 8, pp.5-25, 1983
21 Belderbos, Rene, Martin Carree, Boris Likshin, "Cooperative R & D and Firm Performance", Research Policy, vol 33, pp. 1477-1492, 2002
22 Jang-Pyo Hong, Eun-Young Kim, "Sectoral Patterns of Technological Innovation in Korean Manufacturing Sector", Technology Innovation Research, 17(2), pp. 25-50. 2009
23 Claycomb, C., K. Iyer and R. Germain, "Predicting the Level of B2B e-Commerce in Industrial Organizations", Industrial Marketing Management, 34, 221-234. 2005   DOI   ScienceOn
24 Monczka, R. M., K. j. Petersen, and R. B. Handfield, "Success factor in strategic supplier alliance : The buying company perspectives", Decision Science, 29 (3), 553-577. 1998   DOI   ScienceOn
25 Hardy, C., T. B. Lawrence and D. Grant, "Discourse and Collaboration : the Role of Conversations and Collective Identity", Academy of Management, 30 (6), 58-77. 2004
26 Maria jesús Nieto and Lluis Santa maria, "Technological Col1aboration: Bridging the Innovation Gap between Small and large firms", Journal of Small Business Management, v. 48, n. 1, pp. 44-69, 2010"   DOI   ScienceOn
27 Egelhoff and Haklisch, "Strategy, size of firm, and the use of technical alliances: an exploratory study". Journal of Engineering and Technology Management. v11 i2. 117-148. 1994   DOI   ScienceOn