Browse > Article

Apple eases up on SDK policy: Avoiding antitrust? or strategic decision?  

Kim, Joon-Young (SK경영경제연구소)
Park, Jin-Kyung (연세대학교 커뮤니케이션대학원)
Lee, Bong-Gyou (연세대학교 정보대학원)
Publication Information
Journal of Internet Computing and Services / v.11, no.6, 2010 , pp. 135-144 More about this Journal
Abstract
Apple recently announced a new policy about software development kit that banned the use of tools that convert apps built on other platforms into iPhone apps. Therefore, Adobe cannot develop their software to AppStore that inquire to the Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission about antitrust actions. Someone argue that Apple try to exclusive smartphone market such as the Microsoft antitrust lawsuit in 1998, but this case is essentially different. First, it need to define Apple's software development kit for iPhone and iPad is whether antitrust or not. Because of the characteristics of two-sided market in Smartphone Apple's iPhone cannot monopoly in cellphone or smartphone market, but it can be an antitrust in application store market. However, Apple re-announced new software development kit policy that shows positive results. Instead of hastily intervened regulatory agencies, the DOJ or the FTC, it is quite desirable that watching the interaction between companies that whether market failures or not and if it's harmful for consumer's benefit. Adobe attack Apple to advocate consumers and developers freedom of choice, but the most important thing is conclusion based on a comprehensive analysis need to objective point of view that Apple do whether antitrust act or not and damage to developers and consumers who are both side of platform.
Keywords
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 The Huffington Post, "Apple May Face Antitrust Scrutiny by FTC, DoJ for Developer Agreement", May 2010.
2 U.S. Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission, Antitrust Guidelines for the Licensing of Intellectual Property, April 1995
3 U.S. v. Microsoft, Direct Testimony of Richard L. Schmalensee, U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, Civil Action No. 98-1232. 1999.
4 Wired, U.S. v. Microsoft: Timeline, 2002. http://www.wired.com/techbiz/it/news/2002/11/3 5212
5 Wright, J. "One-sided Logic in Two Sided Markets,", Review of Network Economics, 3 (1). 2004.
6 Mace, M., "Apple, Adobe, and Openness: Let's Get Real", Mobile opportunity. 1999.
7 Moore, J. F., "Predators and Prey: A new ecology of competition." Harvard Business Review, 73 (3): pp.75-86, May 1993.
8 Page, W. H. and Lopatka. J. E., The Microsoft Case: Antitrust, High Technology, and Consumer Welfare. University of Chicago Press. 2009.
9 Stefanadis, C., "Downstream Vertical Foreclosure and Upstream Innovation." Journal of Industrial Economics. 1997.
10 Juniper Research, Mobile Applications & App Stores Business Models opportunities & Forecasts 2009-2014. 2009.
11 Gilbert, R., and Katz, M. L., "An Economist's Guide to U.S. v Microsoft", Competition Policy Center, Institute of Business and Economic Research, UC Berkeley, Working Paper CPC01-19. 2001.
12 Katz, M., and Shapiro, C. "Antitrust in Software Markets," Competition, Innovation and Microsoft Monopoly: Antitrust in the Digital Marketplace, Eisenach and Lenard (eds.), Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers. 1999.
13 http://www.gizmodo.com
14 IDC, Worldwide Converged Mobile Device 2010-2014 Forecast and Analysis. March 2010
15 Jansen, S., Brinkkemper, S., and Finkelstein, A. "Business Network Management as a Survival Strategy: A Tale of Two Software Ecosystems", 1st International Workshop on Software Ecosystems. 2009.
16 Juniper Research, Mobile Content Strategies & Business Models Scenarios & Forecasts 2008-2013. 2008.
17 Evans, D. and Schmalensee, R., Catalyst Code, Harvard Business School Press. 2007.
18 Gilbert, R., "Networks, Standards, and the Use of Market Dominance: Microsoft(1995)," in Kwoka. J., and White. L., eds., The Antitrust Revolution, 3rd edn. Oxford, 1998.
19 http://metrics.admob.com
20 Evans, D. and Schmalensee, R., "Be Nice to Your Rivals: How the Government is Selling an Antitrust Case without Consumer Harm in U.S. v. Microsoft," Did Microsoft Harm Consumers?: Two Opposing Views, AEI-Brookings Joint Center for Regulatory Studies, Washington, D.C. 2000.
21 Apple, 'App Store Review Guidelines' http:// developer.apple.com/appstore/guidelines.html
22 Cripps, T., "Of iPhones and Androids: Redefining the Smartphone and Other Devices", OVUM, March 2009.
23 Distimo, AppStore Report by Platform. 2010
24 Evans, D., "Antitrust Issues Raised By the Emerging Global Internet Economy", Northwestern University Law Review Colloquy, 102, pp 285-306. 2008.
25 Choi, J., "Tying in Two-Sided Markets with Multi-Homing" NET Institute Working Paper No. 06-04; CESifo Working Paper No. 2073. 2007.