Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2022.vol9.no7.0135

An Inclusive Evaluation of Linkage Between Environmental Managerial Accounting and Knowledge Management: Empirical Evidence from Vietnam  

HUYNH, Quang Linh (Faculty of Business Administration, Ho Chi Minh City University of Food Industry)
Publication Information
The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business / v.9, no.7, 2022 , pp. 135-144 More about this Journal
Abstract
The relationship between applying knowledge management and accepting environmentally managed accounting is more complicated than previous studies suggested. Knowledge management is both an antecedent and a consequence of implementing environmentally managed accounting in the workplace. Nonetheless, none of the prior studies have systematically investigated this relationship. The current article attempted to scrutinize the reciprocated multifaceted tie between environmental managerial accounting and knowledge management by utilizing the methods of directed graph searches as well as directed acyclic graphs. The research data was gathered from 342 publicly-listed corporations in Vietnam's key stock markets. The empirical findings disclose that implementing knowledge management can lead to adopting environmental managerial accounting in business, which is, in turn, an antecedent of accepting knowledge management. More importantly, the current research found that the adoption of knowledge management is the first factor to affect the research model. Nonetheless, the usage of knowledge management in business can, in turn, have a positive effect back to the implementing extent of environmental managerial accounting. The findings are beneficial to scientists and particularly to executives by shedding new insight into this reciprocated bond, which can lead executives to make sound decisions regarding knowledge management and environmental managerial accounting for businesses to acquire competitive advantages.
Keywords
Environmental Managerial Accounting; Knowledge Management; Directed Acyclic Graph;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 5  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Droge, C., Claycomb, C., & Germain, R. (2003). Does knowledge mediate the effect of context on performance? Some initial evidence. Decision Sciences, 34(3), 541-568. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5414.2003.02324.x   DOI
2 Al-Hyari, H. (2017). The effect of knowledge management on accounting information systems at Orange. Journal of Information and Knowledge Management, 7(7), 15-24.
3 Bhimani, A., & Roberts, H. (2003). Call for papers: Management Accounting and Knowledge Management. Management Accounting Research, 14(1), 75-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1044-5005(03)00002-7   DOI
4 Birkett, W. P. (1995). Management accounting and knowledge management. Strategic Finance, 77(5), 44-48.
5 Alavi, M., & Leidner, D. E. (2001). Review: Knowledge management and knowledge management systems: Conceptual foundations and research issues. MIS Quarterly, 25(1), 107-136. https://doi.org/10.2307/3250961   DOI
6 Gornjak, M. (2014). Knowledge management and management accounting. Proceedings of the Conference Paper, Portoroz, Slovenia, 25 June to 26 June 2014 (pp. 25-27). Slovenia: ISBBS. http://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.4907.4328   DOI
7 Christ, K. L., & Burritt, R. L. (2013). Environmental management accounting: The significance of contingent variables for adoption. Journal of Cleaner Production, 41, 163-173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.10.007   DOI
8 Darroch, J. (2005). Knowledge management, innovation, and firm performance. Journal of Knowledge Management, 9(3), 101-115. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270510602809   DOI
9 Endiana, I. D. M., Dicriyani, N. L. G. M., Adiyadnya, M. S. P., & Putra, I. P. M. J. S. (2020). The effect of green accounting on corporate sustainability and financial performance. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics, and Business, 7(12), 731-738. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2020.vol7.no12.731   DOI
10 Johnson, R. A., & Wichern, D. W. (2015). Applied multivariate statistical analysis. Statistics, 6(10), 62.
11 Klein, D. A., & Prusak, L. (1994). Characterizing intellectual capital. Baltimore, MD: Center for Business Innovation.
12 Lin, H. F., & Lee, G. G. (2005). Impact of organizational learning and knowledge management factors on e-business adoption. Management Decision, 43(2), 171-188. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251740510581902   DOI
13 Novas, J. C., Sousa, A., & Alves, M. C. (2012). On the relations between management accounting systems and intellectual capital: Evidence for Portuguese companies (CEFAGE-UE, Working Paper No. 2012/13). Portugal: University of Evora. http://old.cefage.uevora.pt/en/content/download/3087/41142/version/1/file/2012_13.pdf
14 Sori, Z. M. (2009). Accounting information systems (AIS) and knowledge management: A case study. American Journal of Scientific Research, 4(4), 36-44.
15 Hameed, A. A. (2018). Environmental accounting in India: A conceptual study. NOLEGEIN-Journal of Financial Planning And Management, 1(2), 32-38.
16 Tayles, M., Bramley, A., Adshead, N., & Farr, J. (2002). Dealing with the management of intellectual capital: The potential role of strategic management accounting. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 15(2), 251-267. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513570210425574   DOI
17 Wong, K. Y., & Aspinwall, E. (2005). An empirical study of the important factors for knowledge management adoption in the SME sector. Journal of Knowledge Management, 9(3), 64-82. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270510602773   DOI
18 Edwards, J. S., Collier, P. M., & Shaw, D. (2005). Knowledge management and its impact on the management accountant. London: Chartered Institute of Management Accountants.
19 Fullerton, R. R., & McWatters, C. S. (2001). The production performance benefits from JIT implementation. Journal of Operations Management, 19(1), 81-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-6963(00)00051-6   DOI
20 Gibassier, D. (2012). Environmental management accounting and innovation: An exploratory analysis. Social and Environmental Accountability Journal, 32(2), 112-113. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969160X.2012.718905   DOI
21 Huynh, Q. L., & Lan, T. T. N. (2021). Importance of environmental managerial accounting to environmental and economic performance. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 11(5), 381-388. https://doi.org/10.32479/ijeep.11511   DOI
22 Kamruzzaman, M. M. (2012). The framework of environmental management accounting: An overview. SSRN Journal, 31, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2179031   DOI
23 Kittikunchotiwut, P., & Siriyota, K. (2021). The impact of intellectual capital on knowledge management processes in Thailand. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics, and Business, 8(9), 249-260. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2021.vol8.no9.0249   DOI
24 Kok, A. (2007). Intellectual capital management as part of knowledge management initiatives at institutions of higher learning. Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management, 5(2), 181-192.
25 Lee, T. (2005). Environmental issues and managerial accounting: The IFAC exposure draft. Petroleum Accounting and Financial Management Journal, 24(1), 1-22.
26 Salojarvi, S., Furu, P., & Sveiby, K. E. (2005). Knowledge management and growth in Finnish SMEs. Journal of Knowledge Management, 9(2), 103-122. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270510590254   DOI
27 Mubarak, A. (2013). Knowledge management and management accounting decisions-experimental study. Journal of Organizational Knowledge Management, 1(1), 1-14.
28 Tayles, M., Pike, R. H., & Sofian, S. (2007). Intellectual capital, management accounting practices and corporate performance: Perceptions of managers. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 20(4), 522-548. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513570710762575   DOI
29 Muthuveloo, R., Shanmugam, N., & Teoh, A. P. (2017). The impact of tacit knowledge management on organizational performance: Evidence from Malaysia. Asia Pacific Management Review, 22(4), 192-201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmrv.2017.07.010   DOI
30 Salloum, S. A., Alhamad, Q. M., A., Al-Emran, M., Abdel Monem, A., & Shaalan, K. (2019). Exploring students' acceptance of e-learning through the development of a comprehensive technology acceptance model. IEEE Access, 7, 128462. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2939467   DOI
31 Sullivan, P. H. (2000). Value-driven intellectual capital: How to convert intangible corporate assets into market value. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
32 Syed, A., Gul, N., Khan, H. H., Danish, M., Ul Haq, S. M., Sarwar, B., Azhar, U., & Ahmed, W. (2021). The impact of knowledge management processes on knowledge sharing attitude: The role of subjective norms. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics, and Business, 8(1), 1017-1030. http://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2021.vol8.no1.1017   DOI
33 Tran, N. H., Hoang, T. H., & Nguyen, T. T. H. (2020). Environmental management accounting perception and implementation in the automobile industry in Vietnam. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics, and Business, 7(12), 941-949. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2020.vol7.no12.941   DOI
34 Zandi, G. R., Khalid, N., & Islam, D. M. Z. (2019). Nexus of knowledge transfer, green innovation and environmental performance: Impact of environmental management accounting. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 9(5), 387-393. https://doi.org/10.32479/ijeep.8285   DOI