1 |
Eslamian, D., & Khademi, B. (2017). Effect of information and communication technologies on academic achievement of high school students in Neyriz. American Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 5(2), 11-16. https://doi.org/10.11634/232907811705871
DOI
|
2 |
Mohammadi, H. (2015). Investigating users' perspectives on e-learning: An integration of TAM and IS success model. Computers in Human Behavior, 45, 359-374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.07.044
DOI
|
3 |
Okazaki, S., & Renda Dos Santos, L. M. (2012). Understanding e-learning adoption in brazil: Major determinants and gender effects. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 13(4), 91-106. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v13i4.1266
DOI
|
4 |
Pham, Q. T., & Tran, T. P. (2018). Impact factors on using of e-learning system and learning achievement of students at several universities in Vietnam. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 78, 394-409. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95171-3_31
DOI
|
5 |
Rosenberg, M. J. (2005). Beyond e-learning: Approaches and technologies to enhance organizational knowledge, learning, and performance. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
|
6 |
Soudani, S. N. (2012). The usefulness of an accounting information system for effective organizational performance. International Journal of Economics and Finance, 4(5), 136-145. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijef.v4n5p136
DOI
|
7 |
Hwang, R. H., Lin, H. T., Sun, J. C. Y., & Wu, J. J. (2019). Improving learning achievement in science education for elementary school students via blended learning. International Journal of Online Pedagogy and Course Design, 9(2), 44-62. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJOPCD.2019040104
DOI
|
8 |
Baber, H. (2021). Modeling the acceptance of e-learning during the pandemic of COVID-19-A study of South Korea. International Journal of Management Education, 19(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2021.100503
DOI
|
9 |
Abbad, M. M., Morris, D., & Nahlik, C. D. (2009). Looking under the bonnet: Factors affecting student adoption of e-learning systems in Jordan. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 10(2), 1-25. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ844015.pdf
|
10 |
Al-Alak, B. A., & Alnawas, L. A. M. (2011). Measuring the acceptance and adoption of e-learning by academic staff. Knowledge Management and E-Learning: An International Journal, 3(2), 201-221.
|
11 |
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.51.6.1173
DOI
|
12 |
Budu, K. W. A., Yinping, M., & Mireku, K. K. (2018). Investigating the effect of behavioral intention on e-learning systems usage: Empirical study on tertiary education institutions in Ghana. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 9(3), 201-216. https://doi.org/10.2478/mjss-2018-0062
DOI
|
13 |
Chang, C. T., Hajiyev, J., & Su, C. R. (2017). Examining the students' behavioral intention to use e-learning in Azerbaijan? The General Extended Technology Acceptance Model for e-learning approach. Computers and Education, 111, 128-143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.04.010
DOI
|
14 |
Cavanaugh, C. S. (2001). The effectiveness of interactive distance education technologies in K-12 learning: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications, 7(1), 73-88.
|
15 |
Iswanto, D. (2021). The effect of perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use of WhatsApp on employee engagement and employee performance. International Journal of Economics, Business, and Entrepreneurship, 4(2), 13-24. https://doi.org/10.23960/ijebe.v4i2.78
DOI
|
16 |
Kassim, N. H., Noor, N. M., Kasuma, J., Saleh, J., Dealwis, C., & Nurhisham, M. A. (2020). Sustaining job performance through technology acceptance with the usage of the WhatsApp mobile application. International Journal of Service Management and Sustainability, 5(1), 123-148. https://doi.org/10.24191/ijsms.v5i1.9863
DOI
|
17 |
Chen, J. L. (2011). The effects of education compatibility and technological expectancy on e-learning acceptance. Computers and Education, 57(2), 1501-1511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.02.009
DOI
|
18 |
Davis, F. D. (1986). A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems: Theory and results [Doctoral Dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology] Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/15192
|
19 |
Al-Qahtani, A. A. Y., & Higgins, S. E. (2013). Effects of traditional, blended, and e-learning on students' achievement in higher education. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29(3), 220-234. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2012.00490.x
DOI
|
20 |
Bhuasiri, W., Xaymoungkhoun, O., Zo, H., Rho, J. J., & Ciganek, A. P. (2012). Critical success factors for e-learning in developing countries: A comparative analysis between ICT experts and faculty. Computers and Education, 58(2), 843-855. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.10.010
DOI
|
21 |
Cheong, J. H., & Park, M. C. (2005). Mobile internet acceptance in Korea. Internet Research, 15(2), 125-140. https://doi.org/10.1108/10662240510590324
DOI
|
22 |
Franklin, U. E., & Nahari, A. A. (2018). The Impact of e-learning on academic performance: Preliminary examination of King Khalid University. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 7(1), 83-96. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARPED/v7-i1/3903
DOI
|
23 |
Kumar, N., & Bajpai, R. P. (2015). Impact of e-learning on achievement motivation and academic performance-A case study of college students in Sikkim. CALIBER, 77, 370-382.
|
24 |
Goodman, L. A. (1960). On the exact variance of products. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 55(292), 708-713. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1960.10483369
DOI
|
25 |
Hakim, S. R., Kustijono, R., & Wiwin, E. (2019). The use of android-based teaching materials in the physics learning process at vocational high school. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1171, 012024. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1171/1/012024
DOI
|
26 |
Igbaria, M., Zinatelli, N., Cragg, P., & Cavaye, A. L. M. (1997). Personal computing acceptance factors in small firms: A structural equation model. MIS Quarterly, 21(3), 279-305. https://doi.org/1-0.2307/249498
DOI
|
27 |
Botero, G. G., Questier, F., Cincinnato, S., He, T., & Zhu, C. (2018). Acceptance and usage of mobile-assisted language learning by higher education students. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 30(3), 426-451. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-018-9177-1
DOI
|
28 |
Doan, T. T. T. (2021). The effect of perceived risk and technology self-efficacy on online learning intention: An empirical study in Vietnam. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics, and Business, 8(10), 385-393. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2021.vol8.no10.0385
DOI
|
29 |
Weerathunga, P. R., Samarathunga, W. H. M. S., Rathnayake, H. N., Agampodi, S. B., Nurunnabi, M., & Madhunimasha, M. M. S. C. (2021). The COVID-19 pandemic and the acceptance of e-learning among university students: The role of precipitating events. Education Sciences, 11(8), 436. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11080436
DOI
|
30 |
Fatima, G., & Jabeen, S. M. (2021). Use of information communication technologies (ICTs) and academic achievement of university students: A correlational investigation. Journal of Business and Social Review in Emerging Economies, 7(1), 131-138.
DOI
|
31 |
Park, M. J., & Lee, J. K. (2021). Investigation of college students' intention to accept online education services: An application of the UTAUT model in Korea. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics, and Business, 8(6), 327-336. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2021.vol8.no6.0327
DOI
|
32 |
Johnson, G. M. (2005). Student alienation, academic achievement, and WebCT use. Journal of Educational Technology and Society, 8(2), 179-189.n http://elibrary.lt/resursai/Uzsienio%20leidiniai/IEEE/English/2006/Volume%208/Issue%202/Jets_v8i2_17.pdf
|
33 |
Gopal, R., Singh, V., & Aggarwal, A. (2021). Impact of online classes on the satisfaction and performance of students during the pandemic period of COVID-19. Education and Information Technologies, 26(6), 6923-6947. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10523-1
DOI
|
34 |
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2012). Multivariate data analysis. New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall.
|
35 |
Hoerunnisa, A., Suryani, N., & Efendi, A. (2019). The effectiveness of the use of e-learning in multimedia classes to improve vocational students' learning achievement and motivation. Kwangsan: Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan, 7(2), 123-137. https://doi.org/10.31800/jtp.kw.v7n2.p123--137
DOI
|
36 |
Jawad, Y. A. L. A., & Shalash, B. (2020). The impact of e-learning strategy on students' academic achievement case study: Al-Quds Open University. International Journal of Higher Education, 9(6), 44-53. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v9n6p44
DOI
|
37 |
Kimathi, F. A., & Zhang, Y. (2019). Exploring the general extended technology acceptance model for e-learning approach on student's usage intention on e-learning system in University of Dar Es Salaam. Creative Education, 10(1), 208-223. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2019.101017
DOI
|
38 |
Zhu, D. S., Lin, Y. P., Huang, S. Y., & Lu, C. T. (2009). The effect of competitive strategy, task uncertainty, and organization structure on the usefulness and performance of the management accounting system (MAS). International Journal of Business Performance Management, 11(4), 336-363. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBPM.2009.030954
DOI
|
39 |
Sukendro, S., Habibi, A., Khaeruddin, K., Indrayana, B., Syahruddin, S., Makadada, F. A., & Hakim, H. (2020). Using an extended technology acceptance model to understand students' use of e-learning during Covid-19: Indonesian sports science education context. Heliyon, 6(11), e05410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05410
DOI
|
40 |
Tarhini, A., Hone, K., Liu, X., & Tarhini, T. (2017). Examining the moderating effect of individual-level cultural values on users' acceptance of e-learning in developing countries: A structural equation modeling of an extended technology acceptance model. Interactive Learning Environments, 2(3), 306-328. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2015.1122635
DOI
|
41 |
Lee, J. W., Becker, K., & Potluri, R. M. (2016). Antecedents of corporate adoption of social media and the role of the technology acceptance model in the path. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics, and Business, 3(2), 67-76. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2016.vol3.no2.67
DOI
|
42 |
Marlina, E., Tjahjadi, B., & Ningsih, S. (2021). Factors affecting student performance in e-learning: A case study of higher educational institutions in Indonesia. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics, and Business, 8(4), 993-1001. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2021.vol8.no4.0993
DOI
|
43 |
Mothibi, G. (2015). A meta-analysis of the relationship between e-learning and students' academic achievement in higher education. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(9), 6-9. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1082408.pdf
|
44 |
Salloum, S. A., Qasim Mohammad Alhamad, A., Al-Emran, M., Abdel Monem, A., & Shaalan, K. (2019). Exploring students' acceptance of e-learning through the development of a comprehensive technology acceptance model. IEEE Access, 7-128462. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2939467
DOI
|
45 |
Nugroho, M. A., Dewanti, P. W., & Novitasari, B. T. (2018). The impact of perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use on student's performance in mandatory e-learning use. ICAITI, 54, 26-30.
|
46 |
Omar, N., Munir, Z. A., Kaizan, F. Q., Noranee, S., & Malik, S. A. (2019). The impact of employees' motivation, perceived usefulness, and perceived ease of use on employee performance among selected public sector employees. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 9(6), 1128-1139. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v9-i6/6074
DOI
|
47 |
Harwell, M. C., & Jackson, C. A. (2021). Synthesis of Two Decades of US EPA's Ecosystem Services Research to Inform Environmental, Community, and Sustainability Decision Making. Sustainability, 13(15), 1-8249. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13158249
DOI
|
48 |
Hartshorne, R., & Ajjan, H. (2009). Examining student decision to adopt web 2.0 technologies: Theory and empirical tests. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 21(3), 183-198. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-009-9023-6
DOI
|
49 |
Sugiyanta, L., & Moch. Sukardjo, M. (2018). The adjusted framework of m-learning in a blended learning system for mathematics study field of junior high school level VII. In IOP Conference Series. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. IOP Publishing, 336(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/336/1/012031
DOI
|
50 |
Tuna, J. R., Manoppo, C. T. M., Kaparang, D. R., & Mewengkang, A. (2018). E-learning development process for operating system course in vocational school. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 306(1), 2068. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/306/1/012068
DOI
|
51 |
Sibanda, M., & Donnelly, S. (2014). The impact of e-learning on student performance: A case study of an entry-level module at a South African University. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 5(9), 478-485. https://www.richtmann.org/journal/index.php/mjss/article/view/2662/2630
|
52 |
Li, S. D. (2011). Testing mediation using multiple regression and structural equation modeling analyses in secondary data. Evaluation Review, 35(3), 240-268. https://doi.org/10.1177/0193841X11412069
DOI
|