1 |
Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297-334. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02310555
DOI
|
2 |
Falagas, M. E., Pitsouni, E. I., Malietzis, G. A., & Pappas, G. (2008). Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: Strengths and weaknesses. FASEB Journal, 22(2), 338-342. https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.07-9492LSF
DOI
|
3 |
Alotaibi, F., & Johnson, F. (2020). Why we like Google Scholar: postgraduate students' perceptions of factors influencing their intention to use. Aslib Journal of Information Management, 72(4), 304. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJIM-10-2019-0304
DOI
|
4 |
Amara, N., & Landry, R. (2012). Counting citations in the field of business and management: Why use Google Scholar rather than the Web of Science. Scientometrics, 93(3), 553-581. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0729-2
DOI
|
5 |
Anker, M. S., Hadzibegovic, S., Lena, A., & Haverkamp, W. (2019). The difference in referencing in Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar. ESC Heart Failure, 6(6), 1291-1312. https://doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.12583
DOI
|
6 |
Belkin, N. J., & Croft, A. (1992). Anomalous state of knowledge as the basis for information retrieval. Canadian Journal of Library and Information Science, 5, 133-143. https://faculty.washington.edu/harryb/courses/INFO310/Belkin1980_ASK.pdf
|
7 |
Wang, Y. (2020). Web-scale discovery and Google Scholar: A study in use patterns. Journal of Electronic Resources Librarianship, 32(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1080/1941126X.2019.1709722
DOI
|
8 |
Byrne, B. M. (2010). Structural equation modeling with Mplus: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. UK: Taylor & Francis.
|
9 |
Cothran, T. (2011). Google Scholar acceptance and use among graduate students: A quantitative study. Library and Information Science Research, 33(4), 293-301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2011.02.001
DOI
|
10 |
Kousha, K., & Thelwall, M. (2019). Can Google Scholar and Mendeley help to assess the scholarly impacts of dissertations? Journal of Informetrics, 13(2), 467-484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2019.02.009
DOI
|
11 |
Johnson, F., Rowley, J., & Sbaffi, L. (2016). Exploring information interactions in the context of Google. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67(4), 824-840. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23443
DOI
|
12 |
Joshi, A., Kale, S., Chandel, S., & Pal, D. (2015). Likert scale: Explored and explained. British Journal of Applied Science and Technology, 7(4), 396-403. https://doi.org/10.9734/BJAST/2015/14975
DOI
|
13 |
Kidder, L. H., & Fine, M. (1987). Qualitative and quantitative methods: When stories converge. New Directions for Program Evaluation, 35, 1459-1501. https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.1459
DOI
|
14 |
Gusenbauer, M. (2019). Google Scholar to overshadow them all?. Comparing the sizes of 12 academic search engines and bibliographic databases. Scientometrics, 118(1), 177-214. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2958-5
DOI
|
15 |
Oh, K. E., & Colon-Aguirre, M. (2019). A comparative study of perceptions and use of google scholar and academic library discovery systems. College and Research Libraries, 80(6), 876-891. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.80.6.876
DOI
|
16 |
Mueller, R. O., & Hancock, G. R. (2015). Factor analysis and latent structure analysis: Confirmatory factor analysis. International encyclopedia of the social and Behavioral Science, 87, 978-991. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.25009-5
DOI
|
17 |
Lavidas, K., Achriani, A., Athanassopoulos, S., Messinis, I., & Kotsiantis, S. (2020). University students' intention to use search engines for research purposes: A structural equation modeling approach. Education and Information Technologies, 25(4), 2463-2479. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-10071-9
DOI
|
18 |
Borlund, P., & Pharo, N. (2019). A need for information-on-information needs. Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Conceptions of Library and Information Science, Ljubljana, Slovenia, June 16-19, 2019 (pp. 1908-1919). Boras, Sweden: UoB. http://www.informationr.net/ir/24-4/colis/colis1908.html
|
19 |
Martin-Martin, A., Thelwall, M., Orduna-Malea, E., & Delgado Lopez-Cozar, E. (2021). Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic, Scopus, Dimensions, Web of Science, and OpenCitations' COCI: A multidisciplinary comparison of coverage via citations. Scientometrics, 126(1), 871-906. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03690-4
DOI
|
20 |
Mikki, S. (2010). Comparing Google Scholar and ISI Web of Science for earth sciences. Scientometrics, 82(2), 321-331. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0038-6
DOI
|
21 |
Nguyen, T., Bui, T. H. V., Nguyen, T. L. T., Tran, M. D., & Tran, T. K. N. (2021). Perception of organizational support to lecturers' research motivation: The case of Vietnam. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics, and Business, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2021.vol8.no2.0657
DOI
|
22 |
Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). The assessment of reliability. Psychometric Theory, 3, 248-292.
|
23 |
Rafika, A. S., Putri, H. Y., & Widiarti, F. D. (2017). Analisis mesin pencarian Google Scholar sebagai sumber baru untuk kutipan. Journal CERITA, 3(2), 193-205. https://doi.org/10.33050/cerita.v3i2.657
DOI
|
24 |
Ruthven, I. (2019). The language of information needs: Differentiating conscious and formalized information needs. Information Processing and Management, 56(1), 77-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2018.09.005
DOI
|
25 |
Shen, L. (2012). Graduate students report strong acceptance and loyal usage of google scholar. Evidence-Based Library and Information Practice, 7(4). https://doi.org/10.18438/B8RW3P
DOI
|
26 |
Wu, M., & Chen, S. C. (2014). Graduate students appreciate Google Scholar, but still, find a use for libraries. Electronic Library, 32(3), 375-389. https://doi.org/10.1108/EL-08-2012-0102
DOI
|
27 |
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 14(4), 336-337. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(05)80231-2
DOI
|
28 |
Tella, A., Oyewole, M., & Tella, A. (2017). An analysis of perceived usefulness of Google Scholar by the postgraduate students of the University of Ilorin, Nigeria. SA Journal of Information Management, 19(1), 793. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajim.v19i1.793
DOI
|
29 |
Noruzi, A. (2005). Google Scholar: The new generation of citation indexes. In Libri, 55(4). https://doi.org/10.1515/LIBR.2005.170
DOI
|
30 |
Yahua, Q., Jizong, W., Yi, Y., Ming, Z., & Shilong, L. (2011). Determination of 235U isotope abundance by measuring selected pairs of fission products. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A, 665, 70-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2011.10.020
DOI
|
31 |
Zientek, L. R., Werner, J. M., v. Campuzano, M. V., & Nimon, K. (2018). The use of Google Scholar for research and research dissemination. New Horizons in Adult Education and Human Resource Development, 30(1), 39-46. https://doi.org/10.1002/nha3.20209
DOI
|
32 |
Le, D. T. H., Nguyen, L. D. B., Phan, C. L. N., Vu, T. M., & Phan, H. T. (2022). Factors affecting training quality and student satisfaction: An empirical study in Vietnam. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics, and Business, 9(4), 391-398. https://doi.org/10.13106/JAFEB.2022.VOL9.NO4.0391
DOI
|
33 |
Taherdoost, H. (2018). Validity and reliability of the research instrument; how to test the validation of a questionnaire/survey in research. SSRN Electronic Journal, 1(1), 56-70. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3205040
DOI
|
34 |
Brezina, V. (2012). Use of Google Scholar in corpus-driven EAP research. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 11(4), 319-331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2012.08.001
DOI
|
35 |
Taylor, R. S. (1968). Question-negotiation and information seeking in libraries. College and Research Libraries, 29(3), 178-194. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl_29_03_178
DOI
|
36 |
Alzhanova, F. G., Kireyeva, A. A., Satpayeva, Z. T, Tsoy, A. A., & Nurbatsin, A. (2020). Analysis of the level of technological development and digital readiness of scientific-research institutes. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics, and Business, 7(12), 1133-1147. https://doi.org/10.13106/JAFEB.2020.VOL7.NO12.1133
DOI
|
37 |
Beel, J., & Gipp, B. (2009). Google Scholar's ranking algorithm: An introductory overview. 12th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics, ISSI 2009, Rio De Janerio, Brazil, 14-17 July 2009 (pp. 31-38 ). BIREME: Brazil. https://doi.org/10.1.1.303.31
|