Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2021.vol8.no9.0113

Spatial Structure and Dynamic Evolution of Urban Cooperative Innovation Network in Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area, China: An Analysis Based on Cooperative Invention Patents  

HU, Shan Shan (Business School, Lingnan Normal University)
KIM, Hyung-Ho (Department of Air Transport and Logistics, Sehan University)
Publication Information
The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business / v.8, no.9, 2021 , pp. 113-119 More about this Journal
Abstract
With the increasing pressure of international competition, urban agglomeration cooperation and innovation had become an important means of regional economic development. This study analyzed the spatial characteristics of the Urban Cooperative Innovation Network in Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area, found out the dynamic evolution law of innovation, provided suggestions for policy management departments, and effectively planned the industrial layout. According to the data of the State Intellectual Property Office of China, this study researched invention patents from 2005 to 2019. This paper constructed the urban cooperative innovation network, and took 11 cities in the bay area as the research objects, and used social network analysis to study the spatial structure and dynamic evolution of the urban innovation network. Every indicator reflected the urban cooperative innovation, but they all showed a certain decline in 2008-2010. And it is inferred that the innovation network space of each city will be "obvious fist advantages, significant spillover effect and weakening role of Hong Kong and Macao". This paper divided urban cooperative innovation of Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area into three stages. Summing up the characteristics of each stage is helpful to recognize the changes of urban cooperative innovation and to do a good job in industrial layout planning.
Keywords
Urban Cooperative Innovation Network; Dynamic Evolution; Invention Patents; Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 O'Malley, A. J., & Christakis, N. A. (2011). Longitudinal analysis of large social networks: Estimating the effect of health traits on changes in friendship ties. Statistics in Medicine, 30(9), 950-964. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.4190   DOI
2 Nguyen, V. T., Hoang, T. T., & Nguyen, S. M. (2020). The effect of trade integration on business cycle synchronization in East Asia. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics, and Business, 7(8), 225-231. https://doi:10.13106/jafeb.2020.vol7.no8.225   DOI
3 Shah, I. H., Dong, L., & Park, H. S. (2020). Tracking urban sustainability transition: An eco-efficiency analysis on ecoindustrial development in Ulsan, Korea. Journal of Cleaner Production, 262(20), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121286   DOI
4 Wong, M. C. S, & Bhatti, W. I. (2019). Developing international Sukuk in East Asia: Implications from Hong Kong Sukuk. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics, and Business, 6(4), 9-17. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2019.vol6.no4.9   DOI
5 West, J., & Lakhani, K. R. (2008). Getting clear about communities in open innovation. Industry & Innovation, 15(2), 223-231. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662710802033734   DOI
6 Petruzzelli, A. M. (2011). The impact of technological relatedness, prior ties, and geographical distance on university-industry collaborations: A joint-patent analysis. Technovation, 31(7), 309-319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2011.01.008   DOI
7 Schwartz, M., Peglow, F., & Fritsch, M., et al. (2016). What drives innovation output from subsidized R&D cooperation? Project-level evidence from Germany. Technovation, 32(6), 358-369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2012.03.004   DOI
8 Seppo, L., Anna-Greta, N., & Mika, W. (2020). Change processes in open innovation networks- Exploring living labs. Industrial Marketing Management, 91(9), 701-718. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2019.01.013   DOI
9 Tariq, R., Khan, M. A., & Rahman, A. (2020). How does financial development impact economic growth in Pakistan? New evidence from the threshold model. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics, and Business, 7(8), 161-173. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2020.vol7.no8.161   DOI
10 Taylor, P. J. (2010). Specification of the world city network. Geographical Analysis, 33(2), 181-194. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1538-4632.2001.tb00443.x   DOI
11 Zachary, N. (2011). Differentiating centrality and power in the world city network. Urban Study, 48(3), 2733-2748. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098010388954   DOI
12 Kiesling, E., Gunther, M., & Stummer, C., et al (2012). Agent-based simulation of innovation diffusion: A review. Central European Journal of Operations Research, 20(2), 183-230. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10100-011-0210-y   DOI
13 Hannington, S. O., Jash, B. O., Janice, G. C. & John, O. O. (2020). The role of technology in inclusive innovation of urban agriculture. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 43(4),106-111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2019.12.007   DOI
14 Cojoc, D., & Stoian, A. (2014). Dishonesty and charitable behavior. Experimental Economics, 17(4), 717-732. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10683-014-9391-2   DOI
15 Dong, F., Wang, Y., Zheng, L., & Xie, S. X. (2020). Can industrial agglomeration promote pollution agglomeration? Evidence from China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 246(10), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118960   DOI
16 Diez, J. R (2002). Metropolitan innovation system: A comparison between Barcelona, Stockholm, and Vienna. International Regional Science Review, 25(1), 63-85. https://doi.org/10.1177/016001702762039385   DOI
17 Elena,T., David, G., Nadja, I. & Martin, M. (2020). A part of the world or apart from the world? The postsocialist global east in the geopolitics of knowledge. Eurasian Geography and Economics, 61(6), 635-662. https://doi.org/10.1080/15387216.2020.1785908   DOI
18 Elvekrok, I., Veflen, N., Nilsen, E. R., & Gausdal, A. H. (2018). Firm innovation benefits from regional triple-helix networks. Regional Studies, 52(9), 1214-1224. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2017.1370086   DOI
19 Karim, M., & Giovanni, S. (2013). Knowledge, learning, and innovation: research and perspectives. Journal of Knowledge Management, 17(4), 495-510. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM04-2013-0141   DOI
20 Melissa, A. S., & Corey, C. P. (2007). Interfirm collaboration networks: The impact of large-scale network structure on firm innovation. Management Science, 53(7), 1113-1126. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1060.0624   DOI