Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2021.vol8.no8.0037

The Effect of Strategic Innovation on Company Performance: A Case Study of the Industrial Estate of Thailand  

THATRAK, Dararat (Department of Business Administration, Rajamangala University of Technology Lanna)
Publication Information
The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business / v.8, no.8, 2021 , pp. 37-45 More about this Journal
Abstract
The purpose of this study to examine the effect of strategic innovation on organization development, organizational effectiveness, and firm performance of companies in the Industrial Estate of Thailand. The sample of this study was 360 companies and data was collected by distributing questionnaires through mail and Google form. Out of the 360 questionnaires, 192 responses were received and usable. The study period was November 2020 to February 2021. Structural equation modeling (SEM) was used to test hypotheses regarding the influence of strategic innovation on organization development, organizational effectiveness, and firm performance. The results of this study show that strategic innovation has a positive direct effect on organization development, organizational effectiveness, and firm performance. Organizational development has no significant relationship with organizational effectiveness and firm performance, and organizational effectiveness has no significant relationship with firm performance. Strategic innovation has a strong direct positive effect on the company's performance. It indicated that strategic innovation is essential for organizations to drive business growth, generate value for the company and its customers, and create a competitive advantage. This type of innovation is essential for organizations to adapt to the speed of technology change. In addition, theoretical contributions, managerial contributions, limitations, and future research recommendations were presented in this study, including conclusions were shown.
Keywords
Strategic Innovation; Organization Development; Organizational Effectiveness; Firm Performance;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Jones, G. L. (2002). Organizational theory, design, and change (3rd ed.). Texas: Pearson Education.
2 Aaker, D. A., Kumar, V., & Day, G. S. (2001). Marketing research. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons.
3 Ahmed, S. F., Abduljabbar, B. T., & Abed Hussein, A. A. (2021). Strategic intelligence and sustainable competitive advantage of small and medium enterprises: An exploratory study in Iraq. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics, and Business, 8(6), 721-729. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2021.vol8.no6.0721   DOI
4 Odea, E., & Ayavoo, R. (2020). The mediating role of knowledge application in the relationship between knowledge management practices and firm innovation. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 5(3), 210-218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2019.08.002   DOI
5 Palmer, D., & Kaplan, S. (2007) A framework for strategic innovation: Blending strategy and creative exploration to discover future business opportunities. San Francisco, CA: Innovation, LLC.
6 Schumacker, R. E., & Lomax, R. G. (2010). A beginner's guide to structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
7 Soewarno, T., & Permatanadia, M. (2020). Competitive pressure and business performance in East Java Batik industry. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics, and Business, 7(12), 329-336. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2020.vol7.no12.329   DOI
8 Sundbo, J. (2001). The strategic management of innovation. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
9 Vivitjinda, P. (2021). SMEs news. Manager Online. https://mgronline.com/smes/detail/9640000011183 (in Thai)
10 Yesil, S., Koska, A., & Buyukbese, T. (2013). Knowledge sharing process, innovation capability and innovation performance: An empirical study. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 75, 217-225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.04.025   DOI
11 Bhatt, G. D. (2001). Knowledge management in organizations: Examining the interaction between technologies, techniques, and people. Journal of Knowledge Management, 5(1), 68-75. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270110384419   DOI
12 Akdeniz, B., Gonzalez-Padron, T., & Calantone, R. (2008). An integrated marketing capability benchmarking approach to dealer performance through parametric and nonparametric analyses. Industrial Marketing Management, 39(1), 150-160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2008.05.002   DOI
13 Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108   DOI
14 Barth, H. (2003). Fit among competitive strategy, administrative mechanisms, and performance: A comparative study of small firms in mature and new industries. Journal of Small Business Management, 41(2), 133-147. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-627X.00072   DOI
15 Byrne, B. M. (1998). Structural equation modeling with LISREL, Prelis, and Simplis: Basic concepts applications and programming. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
16 Danvila-Del Valle, I. & Sastre Castillo, M.A. (2009). Human capital and sustainable competitive advantage: An analysis of the relationship between training and performance. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 5(2), 139-163. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-008-0090-3   DOI
17 Hana, U. (2013). Competitive advantage achievement through innovation and knowledge. Journal of Competitiveness, 5(1), 82-96.   DOI
18 Inkinen, H. T., Kianto, A., & Vanhala, M. (2015). Knowledge management practices and innovation performance in Finland. Baltic Journal of Management, 10(4), 432-455. https://doi.org/10.1108/BJM-10-2014-0178   DOI
19 Danthamrongkun, W. (2003). Administration. Bangkok: Third Wave Education.
20 Dogan, E. (2017). A strategic approach to innovation. Journal of Management Marketing and Logistic, 4(3), 290-300. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.491   DOI
21 Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis: A global perspective (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Person Prentice Hall.
22 Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Schuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509-533. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7<509::AID-SMJ882>3.0.CO;2-Z   DOI
23 Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1996). Balanced scorecard: Translating strategy into action. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
24 Kline, R. B. (2010). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.
25 Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
26 Schumacker, R. E., & Lomax, R. G. (2004). A beginner's guide to structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
27 Sudarman, D., Kartini, D., Helmi, R. A., Dewi, R. K. (2021). The effect of managerial capabilities, strategic alliance and strategic innovation on product lifecycle management: A case study in Indonesia. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics, and Business, 8(6), 407-414. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2021.vol8.no6.0407   DOI
28 Wutthirong, P. (2015). Innovation management: Resource, learning organization, and innovation. Bangkok, Thailand: Chulapress.
29 Eisenhardt, K., & Martin, J. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management Journal, 21(10/11), 1105-1121. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0266(200010/11)21:10/11<1105::AIDSMJ133>3.0.CO;2-E   DOI
30 Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1992). The balanced scorecard-measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/1992/01/the-balanced-scorecard-measures-thatdrive-performance-2
31 Teece, D. J., & Pisano, G. (1994). The dynamic capabilities of firms: An introduction. Industrial and Corporate Change, 3(3), 537-556. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/3.3.537-a   DOI
32 Kline, R. B. (1993). The handbook of psychological testing. London: Routledge.
33 Lavie, D. (2006) The competitive advantage of interconnected firms: An extension of the resource-based view. Academy of Management Review, 31, 638-658. http://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2006.21318922   DOI
34 Li, C. R., Chu, C. P., & Lin, C. J. (2010). The contingent value of exploratory and exploitative learning for new product development performance. Industrial Marketing Management, 39(7), 1186-1197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2010.02.002   DOI
35 Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and micro-foundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28, 1319-1350. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.640   DOI