Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2021.vol8.no7.0079

Factors Affecting Acceptance and Use of E-Tax Services among Medium Taxpayers in Phnom Penh, Cambodia  

ANN, Samnang (Innovative Technology Management, Graduate School of Business and Advanced Technology Management, Assumption University)
DAENGDEJ, Jirapun (Innovative Technology Management, Graduate School of Business and Advanced Technology Management, Assumption University)
VONGURAI, Rawin (Innovative Technology Management, Graduate School of Business and Advanced Technology Management, Assumption University)
Publication Information
The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business / v.8, no.7, 2021 , pp. 79-90 More about this Journal
Abstract
The purpose of this research is to identify factors affecting the acceptance and use of e-tax services among medium taxpayers in Phnom Penh, Cambodia. The researcher conducted the study based on a quantitative approach by using multi-stage sampling method, which selects a sample size by two or more stages. The first stage sampling was the stratified random sampling and the subsequent stage was purposive sampling. In this study, the stratified random sampling was first used, followed by purposive sampling. The data were collected from 450 medium taxpayers who experienced using e-tax services located in three tax branches in Phnom Penh. This study adapted the confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and structural equation model (SEM) to analyze the model accuracy, reliability and influence of various variables. The primary result showed that behavioral intention has a significant effect on user behavior of e-tax services among medium taxpayers in Phnom Penh, Cambodia. Moreover, the results revealed that performance expectancy, effort expectancy, social influence, and anxiety have significant impact on behavioral intention. In addition, social influence has the strongest impact on behavioral intention, followed by anxiety, performance expectancy and effort expectancy. Conversely, facilitating conditions, trust in government, and trust in internet do not influence behavioral intention.
Keywords
User Behavior; Social Influence; Performance Expectancy; Effort Expectancy; Anxiety;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Lam, L. W. (2012). Impact of competitiveness on salespeople's commitment and performance. Journal of Business Research, 65(9), 1328-1334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.10.026   DOI
2 Gauld, R., Goldfinch, S., & Horsburgh, S. (2010). Do they want it? Do they use it? The 'Demand-Side'of e-Government in Australia and New Zealand. Government Information Quarterly, 27(2), 177-186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2009.12.002   DOI
3 Goodhue, D. L. (2007). Comment on Benbasat and Barki's" Quo Vadis TAM" article. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 8(4), 15. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00125   DOI
4 Hair, Jr, J., Sarstedt, M., Hopkins, L., & Kuppelwieser, V. G. (2014). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): An emerging tool in business research. European Business Review, 26(2), 106-121. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-10-2013-0128   DOI
5 Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118   DOI
6 Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
7 Wiafe, I., Koranteng, F. N., Tettey, T., Kastriku, F. A., & Abdulai, J.-D. (2019). Factors that affect acceptance and use of information systems within the maritime industry in developing countries. Journal of Systems and Information Technology, 22(1), 21-45. https://doi.org/10.1108/jsit-06-2018-0091   DOI
8 Wilson, T. D. (2000). Human information behavior. Informing Science, 3(2), 49-56. https://doi.org/10.28945/576   DOI
9 Yakubu, M. N., & Dasuki, S. I. (2019). Factors affecting the adoption of e-learning technologies among higher education students in Nigeria: A structural equation modelling approach. Information Development, 35(3), 492-502. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266666918765907   DOI
10 Zikmund, W. G., Carr, J. C., & Griffin, M. (2013). Business Research Methods. Boston, MA: Cengage Learning.
11 Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Leech, N. L. (2007). Sampling designs in qualitative research: Making the sampling process more public. Qualitative Report, 12(2), 238-254. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2007.1636   DOI
12 Liebana-Cabanillas, F., Ramos de Luna, I., & Montoro-Rios, F. (2015). User behaviour in QR mobile payment system: The QR payment acceptance model. Technology Analysis Strategic Management, 27(9), 1031-1049. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2015.1047757   DOI
13 Maiga, G., & Asianzu, E. (2013). Adoption of e-tax services in Uganda: a model of citizen-based factors. Electronic Government an International Journal, 10(3-4), 259-283.   DOI
14 Mansoori, K. A. A., Sarabdeen, J., & Tchantchane, A. L. (2018). Investigating Emirati citizens' adoption of e-government services in Abu Dhabi using modified UTAUT model. Information Technology & People, 31(2), 455-481. https://doi.org/10.1108/itp-12-2016-0290   DOI
15 Masrom, M., & Ismail, Z. (2008). Computer ethics awareness among undergraduate students in Malaysian higher education institutions. ACIS 2008 Proceedings, 41. https://doi.org/10.1109/itsim.2008.4632042
16 Nair, P. K., Ali, F., & Leong, L. C. (2015). Factors affecting acceptance & use of ReWIND. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 12(3), 183-201. https://doi.org/10.1108/itse-02-2015-0001   DOI
17 Pavlou, P. A. (2003). Consumer acceptance of electronic commerce: Integrating trust and risk with the technology acceptance model. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 7(3), 101-134. https://doi.org/10.1080/10864415.2003.11044275   DOI
18 Lee, M. K., Cheung, C. M., & Chen, Z. (2005). Acceptance of internet-based learning medium: The role of extrinsic and intrinsic motivation. Information & Management, 42(8), 1095-1104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2003.10.007   DOI
19 Barzelay, M. (2001). The new public management: Improving research and policy dialogue (Vol. 3). Univ of California Press. https://www.ucpress.edu/ebook/9780520925274/the-new-public-management
20 Bagozzi, R. P. (2007). The legacy of the technology acceptance model and a proposal for a paradigm shift. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 8(4), 3. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00122   DOI
21 Becerra, M., & Gupta, A. K. (2003). Perceived trustworthiness within the organization: The moderating impact of communication frequency on trustor and trustee effects. Organization Science, 14(1), 32-44. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.14.1.32.12815   DOI
22 Brand, P., & Roberts, L. (2000). E-commerce and tax administration. Tax Advisor, 31(5), 336-339.
23 Brown, S. A., & Venkatesh, V. (2005). Model of adoption of technology in households: A baseline model test and extension incorporating household life cycle. MIS Quarterly, 399-426. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148690   DOI
24 Huang, C.-L., Srite, M., & Haried, P. (2017). Thinking, feeling, and worrying: How uncertainty and anticipatory anxiety affect technology use. AIS elibrary. https://aisel.aisnet.org/amcis2017/HumanCI/Presentations/15/
25 Kolog, E. A., Sutinen, E., Vanhalakka-Ruoho, M., Suhonen, J., & Anohah, E. (2015). Using unified theory of acceptance and use of technology model to predict students' behavioral intention to adopt and use E-counseling in Ghana. International Journal of Modern Education and Computer Science, 7(11), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1109/afrcon.2015.7331926   DOI
26 Hughes, O. E. (2003). Public management and administration: An introduction. Macmillan International Higher Education.
27 Irani, Z., Elliman, T., & Jackson, P. (2007). Electronic transformation of government in the UK: A research agenda. European Journal of Information Systems, 16(4), 327-335. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000698   DOI
28 Jankowicz, A. (1995). Negotiating shared meanings of the management process: A discourse in two voices. Journal of Constructivist Psychology, 8(2), 117-128. https://doi.org/10.1080/10720539508405246   DOI
29 Jarvenpaa, S. L., & Shaw, T. R. (1998). Global virtual teams: Integrating models of trust. In: P. Sieber & J. Griese (Eds.). Organizational Virtualness (pp. 35-53). Simowa Verlag Bern.
30 Kijsanayotin, B., Pannarunothai, S., & Speedie, S. M. (2009). Factors influencing health information technology adoption in Thailand's community health centers: Applying the UTAUT model. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 78(6), 404-416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2008.12.005   DOI
31 Kong, V. (2020). GDT's Annual Report for 2019. General Department of Taxation, Phnom Penh.
32 Kurfali, M., Arifoglu, A., & Tokdemir, G. (2017). Adoption of e-government services in Turkey. Computers in Human Behavior, 66, 168-178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.09.041   DOI
33 Rehman, M., Esichaikul, V., & Kamal, M. (2012). Factors influencing e-government adoption in Pakistan. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 6(3) 258-282. https://doi.org/10.1108/17506161211251263   DOI
34 McKnight, D. H., & Chervany, N. L. (2000). What is trust? A conceptual analysis and an interdisciplinary model. AMCIS 2000 Proceedings, 382. https://aisel.aisnet.org/amcis2000/382
35 Lee, M. K., & Turban, E. (2001). A trust model for consumer internet shopping. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 6(1), 75-91. https://doi.org/10.1080/10864415.2001.11044227   DOI
36 Phan, T. N., Ho, T. V., & Le-Hoang, P. V. (2020). Factors affecting the behavioral intention and behavior of using e-wallets of youth in Vietnam. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics Business, 7(10), 295-302. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2020.vol7.n10.295   DOI
37 Pynoo, B., Devolder, P., Voet, T., Vercruysse, J., Adang, L., & Duyck, P. (2007). Attitude as a measure for acceptance: Monitoring IS implementation in a hospital setting. SIGHCI Proceedings, 21.
38 Rana, N. P., Dwivedi, Y. K., Lal, B., Williams, M. D., & Clement, M. (2017). Citizens' adoption of an electronic government system: Towards a unified view. Information Systems Frontiers, 19(3), 549-568. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-015-9613-y   DOI
39 Rattanaburi, K., & Vongurai, R. (2021). Factors influencing actual usage of mobile shopping applications: Generation Y in Thailand. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics, Business, 8(1), 901-913. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2021.vol8.no1.901   DOI
40 Almaiah, M. A., Jalil, M. A., & Man, M. (2016). Extending the TAM to examine the effects of quality features on mobile learning acceptance. Journal of Computers in Education, 3(4), 453-485. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-016-0074-1   DOI
41 Snellen, I. (2002). Electronic governance: Implications for citizens, politicians and public servants. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 68(2), 183-198. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852302682002   DOI
42 Carter, L., & Belanger, F. (2004). Citizen adoption of electronic government initiatives. 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, https://doi.org/10.1109/hicss.2004.1265306
43 Carter, L., & Belanger, F. (2005). The utilization of e-government services: Citizen trust, innovation and acceptance factors. Information Systems Journal, 15(1), 5-25. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2575.2005.00183.x   DOI
44 Saade, R., Nebebe, F., & Tan, W. (2007). Viability of the "technology acceptance model" in multimedia learning environments: A comparative study. Interdisciplinary Journal of E-Learning and Learning Objects, 3(1), 175-184. https://doi.org/10.28945/392   DOI
45 Sharma, S., Durand, R. M., & Gur-Arie, O. (1981). Identification and analysis of moderator variables. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(3), 291-300. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800303   DOI
46 Simonson, M. R., Maurer, M., Montag-Torardi, M., & Whitaker, M. (1987). Development of a standardized test of computer literacy and a computer anxiety index. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 3(2), 231-247. https://doi.org/10.2190/7chy-5cm0-4d00-6jcg   DOI
47 Chiu, Y.-T. H., Lee, W.-I., Liu, C.-C., & Liu, L.-Y. (2012). Internet lottery commerce: an integrated view of online sport lottery adoption. Journal of Internet Commerce, 11(1), 68-80. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332861.2012.650990   DOI
48 Sumak, B., Polancic, G., & Hericko, M. (2010). An empirical study of virtual learning environment adoption using UTAUT. 2010 Second international conference on mobile, hybrid, and on-line learning. https://doi.org/10.1109/elml.2010.11
49 Carter, L., Schaupp, L. C., & McBride, M. (2011). The US e-file initiative: An investigation of the antecedents to adoption from the individual taxpayers' perspective. A Journal of Electronic Services in the Public Private Sectors, 7(3), 2-19. https://doi.org/10.2979/eservicej.7.3.2   DOI
50 Carter, L., & Weerakkody, V. (2008). E-government adoption: A cultural comparison. Information Systems Frontiers, 10(4), 473-482. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-008-9103-6   DOI
51 Cooper, D., & Schindler, P. (2011) Business Research Methods. 11th Edition, McGraw Hill, Boston.
52 Dwivedi, Y., & Irani, Z. (2009). Understanding the adopters and non-adopters of broadband. Communications of the ACM, 52(1), 122-125. https://doi.org/10.1145/1435417.1435445   DOI
53 Tongco, M. D. C. (2007). Purposive sampling as a tool for informant selection. Ethnobotany Research, 5, 147-158. https://doi.org/10.17348/era.5.0.147-158   DOI
54 Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8), 982-1003. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982   DOI
55 Alsaif, M. (2014). Factors affecting citizens' adoption of e-government moderated by socio-cultural values in Saudi Arabia. [University of Birmingham]. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/19757623.pdf
56 Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1992-98849-000
57 El-Masri, M., & Tarhini, A. (2017). Factors affecting the adoption of e-learning systems in Qatar and USA: Extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology 2 (UTAUT2). Educational Technology Research and Development, 65(3), 743-763. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9508-8   DOI
58 Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley. https://doi.org/10.2307/2065853
59 Sundaravej, T. (2010). Empirical validation of unified theory of acceptance and use of technology model. Journal of Global Information Technology Management, 13(1), 5-27.   DOI
60 Teicher, J., Hughes, O., & Dow, N. (2002). E-government: A new route to public sector quality. Managing Service Quality: An International Journal. 12(6), 384-393. https://doi.org/10.1108/09604520210451867   DOI
61 Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 425-478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540   DOI
62 Vongurai, R. (2020). Factors affecting customer brand preference toward electric vehicle in Bangkok, Thailand. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics, Business, 7(8), 383-393. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2020.vol7.no8.383   DOI
63 Wang, S., Fan, J., Zhao, D., Yang, S., & Fu, Y. (2016). Predicting consumers' intention to adopt hybrid electric vehicles: Using an extended version of the theory of planned behavior model. Transportation,43(1), 123-143. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-014-9567-9   DOI
64 Heeks, R., & Bailur, S. (2007). Analyzing e-government research: Perspectives, philosophies, theories, methods, and practice. Government Information Quarterly, 24(2), 243-265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2006.06.005   DOI
65 Wang, Y.-S., & Shih, Y.-W. (2009). Why do people use information kiosks? A validation of the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. Government Information Quarterly, 26(1), 158-165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2008.07.001   DOI
66 Weerakkody, V., Al-Shafi, S., Irani, Z., & Lee, H. (2009). E-government adoption in Qatar: An investigation of the citizens' perspective. Digit Proceeding. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.426.4588&rep=rep1&type=pdf
67 West, D. M. (2004). Global E-government, 2004. Center for Public Policy, Brown University.
68 Reddick, C. G. (2005). Citizen interaction with e-government: From the streets to servers? Government Information Quarterly, 22(1), 38-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2004.10.003   DOI
69 Verdegem, P., & Verleye, G. (2009). User-centered e-government in practice: A comprehensive model for measuring user satisfaction. Government Information Quarterly, 26(3), 487-497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2009.03.005   DOI
70 Sudarsono, H., Nugrohowati, R. N. I., & Tumewang, Y. K. (2020). The effect ofcovid-19 pandemic on the adoption of internet banking in Indonesia: Islamic Bank and Conventional Bank. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics, Business, 7(11), 789-800. https://doi.org/10.13106/Jafeb.2020.Vol7.No11.789   DOI
71 Dwivedi, Y. K., Rana, N. P., Jeyaraj, A., Clement, M., & Williams, M. D. (2017). Re-examining the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT): Towards a revised theoretical model. Information Systems Frontiers, 21(3), 719-734. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-017-9774-y   DOI
72 Alsharif, F. F. (2013). Investigating the factors affecting on-line shopping adoption in Saudi Arabia. De Montfort University. https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.585451
73 Agarwal, R. (2000). Individual acceptance of information technologies. Framing the Domains of IT Management: Projecting the Future Through the Past, 85-104.
74 Ahmad, M. O., Markkula, J., & Oivo, M. (2013). Factors affecting e-government adoption in Pakistan: A citizen's perspective. Transforming Government: People, Process Policy, 7(2), 225-239. https://doi.org/10.1108/17506161311325378   DOI
75 Laudon, K., & Laudon, J. (2009). Management Information Systems: International Edition (11th ed.). Prentice-Hall.
76 Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 50(2), 179-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-t   DOI
77 Alanazi, J. (2013). E-government continuance from an expectation confirmation theory perspective: survey research on citizen experience [Doctoral dissertation, University of Wollongong]. https://ro.uow.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=&httpsredir=1&article=4913&context=theses
78 Alenezi, A. R., Veloo A., & Karim, A. (2010). An empirical investigation into the role of enjoyment, computer anxiety, computer self-efficacy and internet experience in influencing the students' intention to use e-learning: A case study from Saudi Arabian governmental universities. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 9(4), 22-34. http://tojet.net/articles/v9i4/943.pdf
79 Ali, F., Nair, P. K., & Hussain, K. (2016). An assessment of students' acceptance and usage of computer supported collaborative classrooms in hospitality and tourism schools. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport & Tourism Education, 18, 51-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhlste.2016.03.002   DOI
80 Alshehri, M., Drew, S., & Alfarraj, O. (2012). A comprehensive analysis of e-government services adoption in Saudi Arabia: Obstacles and challenges. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 3(2), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.14569/ijacsa.2012.030201   DOI
81 Ganesan, S., & Hess, R. (1997). Dimensions and levels of trust: Implications for commitment to a relationship. Marketing Letters, 8(4), 439-448. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1007955514781   DOI
82 Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104   DOI
83 Fung, S., & McAuley, B. (2020). Cambodia's property tax reform: Policy considerations toward sustained revenue mobilization. Asian Development Bank. https://www.adb.org/publications/cambodia-property-tax-reform-revenue-mobilization