Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2021.vol8.no5.0627

Determinants of Audit Fees and the Role of the Board of Directors and Ownership Structure: Evidence from Jordan  

SHAKHATREH, Mohammad Ziad (Department of Accounting, Yarmouk University)
ALSMADI, Safaa Adnan (Department of Accounting, Yarmouk University)
Publication Information
The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business / v.8, no.5, 2021 , pp. 627-637 More about this Journal
Abstract
This research extends the literature on the effect of board characteristics and ownership structure on audit fees; these factors affect the firm's agency costs and how the auditor assesses various risks, hence the audit efforts and fees. The paper introduces political connections as a determinant of audit fees for the first time in Jordan, where the political connection is prevalent and affects decision making on the Jordanian boards. The sample consists of 109 manufacturing and service firms listed on the Amman Stock Exchange (ASE) over the years 2012-2019. Data is obtained from the ASE and the company's annual reports. Board characteristics are measured by board size, independence, leadership duality, meetings frequency, political connections, and audit committee. Ownership structure was measured by concentration, foreign ownership, and Institutional ownership. The study hypotheses were tested by using Generalized Least Squares regression. The Findings showed that larger boards, politically connected firms, and firms with leadership duality are more likely to pay higher fees. Besides, Firms with greater foreign ownership pay less fees, whereas the rest of the variables are insignificant. Results suggest that political connections play a major role in determining audit fees; this provides a recommendation to policymakers in Jordan to reconsider regulations regarding political connections.
Keywords
Audit Fees; Board of Directors; Ownership Structure; Political Connection;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Brickley, J. A., Lease, R. C., & Smith Jr, C. W. (1988). Ownership structure and voting on antitakeover amendments. Journal of Financial Economics, 20, 267-291. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(88)90047-5   DOI
2 Buchner, A., Espenlaub, S., Khurshed, A., & Mohamed, A. (2018). Cross-border venture capital investments: The impact of foreignness on returns. Journal of International Business Studies, 49(5), 575-604. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-017-0116-6   DOI
3 Carcello, J. V., Hermanson, D. R., Neal, T. L., & Riley Jr, R. A. (2002). Board characteristics and audit fees. Contemporary Accounting Research, 19(3), 365-384. https://doi.org/10.1506/CHWK-GMQ0-MLKE-K03V   DOI
4 Chan, P., Ezzamel, M., & Gwilliam, D. (1993). Determinants of audit fees for quoted UK companies. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 20(6), 765-786. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5957.1993.tb00292   DOI
5 Claessens, S., Djankov, S., Fan, J. P., & Lang, L. H. (2002). Disentangling the incentive and entrenchment effects of large shareholdings. The Journal of Finance, 57(6), 2741-2771. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6261.00511   DOI
6 Collier, P., & Gregory, A. (1996). Audit committee effectiveness and the audit fee. European Accounting Review, 5(2), 177-198. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638189600000012   DOI
7 Conger, J. A., Finegold, D., & Lawler, E. E. (1998). Appraising boardroom performance. Harvard Business Review, 76, 136-164. https://hbr.org/1998/01/appraising-boardroom-performance
8 Cornett, M. M., Marcus, A. J., Saunders, A., & Tehranian, H. (2007). The impact of institutional ownership on corporate operating performance. Journal of Banking & Finance, 31(6), 1771-1794. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2006.08.006   DOI
9 Desender, K. A., Aguilera, R., Crespi-Cladera, R., & Garcia-Cestona, M. (2013). Board characteristics and audit fees: Why ownership structure matters. Strategic Management Journal, 34(7), 823-842. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2046   DOI
10 Crane, A. D., Michenaud, S., & Weston, J. P. (2016). The effect of institutional ownership on payout policy: Evidence from index thresholds. The Review of Financial Studies, 29(6), 1377-1408. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhw012   DOI
11 Ettredge, M. L., Scholz, S., & Li, C. (2007). Audit fees and auditor dismissals in the Sarbanes-Oxley era. Accounting Horizons, 21(4), 371-386. https://doi.org/10.2308/acch.2007.21.4.371   DOI
12 Sharma, D. S., Ananthanarayanan, U., & Litt, B. (2020). CEO compensation, corporate governance, and audit fees: Evidence from New Zealand. International Journal of Auditing, 5(1), 117-141. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijau.12211   DOI
13 O'Sullivan, N. (1999). Board characteristics and audit pricing pos-Cadbury: A research note. European Accounting Review, 8(2), 253-263. https://doi.org/10.1080/096381899336023   DOI
14 Raheja, C. G. (2005). Determinants of board size and composition: A theory of corporate boards. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 4(8), 283-306. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022109000002313   DOI
15 Rahman, M. M., Meah, M. R., & Chaudhory, N. U. (2019). The impact of audit characteristics on firm performance: an empirical study from an emerging economy. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics, and Business, 6(1), 59-69. https://doi.org/cite/10.13106/jafeb.2019.vol6.no1.59   DOI
16 Simunic, D. A. (1980). The pricing of audit services: Theory and evidence. Journal of Accounting Research, 18(1), 161-190. https://doi.org/10.2307/2490397   DOI
17 Sudibyo, Y. A., & Jianfu, S. (2016). Political connections, state-owned enterprises, and tax avoidance: An evidence from Indonesia. Corporate Ownership and Control, 13(3), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.22495/cocv13i3c2p2   DOI
18 Fakoussa, D., & Kabis-Kechrid, L. L. (2020). Socio-Economic Challenges and the Impact of Regional Dynamics on Jordan Employment, Social Cohesion, and International Cooperation-Policy Briefs from the Region and Europe.
19 Tran, Q. T., Lam, T. T., & Luu, C. D. (2020). Corporate governance and earnings management: A study of Vietnamese listed banks. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics, and Business, 7(12), 389-395. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2020.vol7.no12.389   DOI
20 Vafeas, N. (1999). Board meeting frequency and firm performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 53(1), 113-142. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-405X(99)00018-5   DOI
21 Fama, E. F., & Jensen, M. C. (1983). Separation of ownership and control. The Journal of Law and Economics, 26(2), 301-325.   DOI
22 Fan, J. P., & Wong, T. J. (2005). Do external auditors perform a corporate governance role in emerging markets? Evidence from East Asia. Journal of Accounting Research, 43(1), 35-72. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-679x.2004.00162.x   DOI
23 Farooq, M. U., Kazim, I., Usman, M., & Latif, I. (2018). Corporate governance and audit fees: Evidence from a developing country. Pakistan Journal of Commerce and Social Sciences (PJCSS), 12(1), 94-110.
24 Hines, C. S., Masli, A., Mauldin, E. G., & Peters, G. F. (2015). Board risk committees and audit pricing. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 34(4), 59-84. https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-51035   DOI
25 Goodwin-Stewart, J., & Kent, P. (2006). Relation between external audit fees, audit committee characteristics, and internal audit. Accounting & Finance, 46(3), 387-404. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-629X.2006.00174   DOI
26 Goyal, V. K., & Park, C. W. (2002). Board leadership structure and CEO turnover. Journal of Corporate Finance, 8(1), 49-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0929-1199(01)00028-1   DOI
27 Han, S., Kang, T., & Rees, L. (2013). The association between institutional ownership and audit properties. Asia-Pacific Journal of Accounting & Economics, 20(2), 199-222. https://doi.org/10.1080/16081625.2012.748449   DOI
28 Hung, C. H. D., Jiang, Y., Liu, F. H., Tu, H., & Wang, S. (2017). Bank political connections and performance in China. Journal of Financial Stability, 32, 57-69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfs.2017.09.003   DOI
29 Zahra, S. A., & Pearce, J. A. (1989). Boards of directors and corporate financial performance: A review and integrative model. Journal of Management, 15(2), 291-334. https;//doi.org/10.1177/014920638901500208   DOI
30 World Bank. (2004). Report on the observance of standards and codes (ROSC): Accounting and auditing: Jordan (English). Washington, DC: The World Bank. http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/323971468272977829/Report-on-the-observance-of-standards-and-codes-ROSC-accounting-and-auditing-Jorda
31 Zhang, J. Z., & Yu, Y. (2016). Does board independence affect audit fees? Evidence from recent regulatory reforms. European Accounting Review, 25(4), 793-814. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180.2015.1117007   DOI
32 Zureigat, Q. M. (2011). The effect of ownership structure on audit quality: Evidence from Jordan. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 2(10), 38-46. http://www.ijbssnet.com/journals/Vol.%202_No._10%3B_June_2011/6.pdf
33 Karim, K., Robin, A., & Suh, S. (2016). Board structure and audit committee monitoring: Effects of audit committee monitoring incentives and board entrenchment on audit fees. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 31(2), 249-276. https://doi.org/10.1177/0148558X15583412   DOI
34 Jensen, M. C. (1986). Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeovers. The American Economic Review, 76(2), 323-329. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1818789
35 Jensen, M. C. (1993). The modern industrial revolution, exit, and the failure of internal control systems. The Journal of Finance, 48(3), 831-880. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1993.tb04022   DOI
36 Jizi, M., & Nehme, R. (2018). Board monitoring and audit fees: the moderating role of CEO/chair dual roles. Managerial Auditing Journal, 33(2), 217. https://doi.org/10.1108/MAJ-10-2016-1464   DOI
37 Johl, S., Subramaniam, N., & Zain, M. M. (2012). Audit committee and CEO ethnicity and audit fees: some Malaysian evidence. The International Journal of Accounting, 47(3), 302-332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intacc.2012.07.002   DOI
38 Kane, G. D., & Velury, U. (2004). The role of institutional ownership in the market for auditing services: an empirical investigation. Journal of Business Research, 57(9), 976-983. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-2963(02)00499-X   DOI
39 Kashif, M., & Zia ur Rehman, D. (2020). The board size and board composition impact on financial performance: An evidence from the Pakistani and Chinese listed banking sector. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics, and Business, 7(4), 81-95. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2020.vol7.no4.81   DOI
40 Khan, A. R., Hossain, D. M., & Siddiqui, J. (2011). Corporate ownership concentration and audit fees: The case of an emerging economy. Advances in Accounting, 27(1), 125-131. https://www.academia.edu/24618831/Corporate_ownership_concentration_and_audit_fees_The_case_of_an_emerging_economy   DOI
41 Leuz, C., & Oberholzer-Gee, F. (2006). Political relationships, global financing, and corporate transparency: Evidence from Indonesia. Journal of Financial Economics, 81(2), 411-439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2005.06.006   DOI
42 Abbott, L. J., Parker, S., Peters, G. F., & Raghunandan, K. (2003). The association between audit committee characteristics and audit fees. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 22(2), 17-32. https://doi.org/10.2308/aud.2003.22.2.17   DOI
43 Abdel-Khalik, A. R. (1993). Why do private companies demand auditing? A case for organizational loss of control. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 8(1), 31-52. https://doi.org/10.1177/0148558X9300800103   DOI
44 Abdullah, A.M., Naser, K., & Al-Enazi, N. (2017). An empirical investigation of factors affecting audit fees: evidence from Kuwait. International Advances in Economic Research, 23(3), 333-347. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11294-017-9649-5   DOI
45 Anderson, R. C., Mansi, S. A., & Reeb, D. M. (2004). Board characteristics, accounting report integrity, and the cost of debt. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 37(3), 315-342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2004.01.004   DOI
46 Ariningrum, I., & Diyanty, V. (2017). The impact of political connections and the effectiveness of the board of commissioner and audit committees on audit fees. Australasian Accounting, Business and Finance Journal, 11(4), 53-70. http://dx.doi.org/10.14453/aabfj.v11i4.5   DOI
47 Kuang, X. (2011). Board characteristics and higher audit quality-Evidence from Chinese listed companies. Paper presented at the MSIE 2011, Harbin, China, 8-11 Jan 2011 (pp. 348-352). https://doi.org/10.1109/MSIE.2011.5707733   DOI
48 Lee, J. (2009). Executive performance-based remuneration, performance change, and board structures. The International Journal of Accounting, 44(2), 138-162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intacc.2009.03.002   DOI
49 Li, B., & Wang, P. (2006). Board characteristics and ratios of audit fee to asset. China Accounting Review, 1(2), 105-118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjar.2012.10.001   DOI
50 Lin, Z. J., & Liu, M. (2009). The impact of corporate governance on auditor choice: Evidence from China. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing, and Taxation, 18(1), 44-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intaccaudtax.2008.12.005   DOI
51 Mitra, S., Hossain, M., & Deis, D. R. (2007). The empirical relationship between ownership characteristics and audit fees. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 28(3), 257-285. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11156-006-0014-7   DOI
52 Monks, R., & Minow, N. (1995). Corporate governance. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Publishers.
53 Niemi, L. (2005). Audit effort and fees under concentrated client ownership: Evidence from four international audit firms. The International Journal of Accounting, 40(4), 303-323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intacc.2005.09.006   DOI
54 Brennan, M. J., & Cao, H. H. (1997). International portfolio investment flows. The Journal of Finance, 52(5), 1851-1880. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1997.tb02744.x   DOI
55 Nurjanah, F., & Sudaryati, E. (2019). The effect of political connection and effectiveness of audit committee on audit fee. The Indonesian Accounting Review, 9(2), 227-234. https://doi.org/10.14414/tiar.v9i2.1848   DOI
56 Ben Ali, C., & Lesage, C. (2013). Financial auditors facing agency conflicts: An audit fees determinants study in France. Comptabilite Controle Audit, 19(1), 59-89. https://www.cairn.info/revue-comptabilite-controle-audit-2013-1-page-59.htm   DOI
57 Berger, P. G., Ofek, E., & Yermack, D. L. (1997). Managerial entrenchment and capital structure decisions. The Journal of Finance, 52(4), 1411-1438. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1997.tb01115   DOI
58 Bliss, M. A., Muniandy, B., & Majid, A. (2007). CEO duality, audit committee effectiveness, and audit risks. Managerial Auditing Journal, 22(7), 716-728. https://doi.org/10.1108/02686900710772609   DOI
59 Boo, E. F., & Sharma, D. (2008). Effect of regulatory oversight on the association between internal governance characteristics and audit fees. Accounting & Finance, 48(1), 51-71. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-629X.2007.00229.x   DOI