Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2021.vol8.no5.0445

The Integration of Social Media to the Theory of Planned Behavior: A Case Study in Indonesia  

SIHOMBING, Sabrina O. (Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Pelita Harapan)
PRAMONO, Rudy (Pelita Harapan University)
Publication Information
The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business / v.8, no.5, 2021 , pp. 445-454 More about this Journal
Abstract
Leader and leadership are one of the important aspects in the life of a country. This study aims to predict the intention of young voters to vote for state leader elections by expanding the theory of planned behavior to the Indonesian context. Apart from the importance of the presidential election, research rarely uses the theory of planned behavior, and to the best of researchers' knowledge, there are no studies that have applied the theory of planned behavior to predict the intention to vote for the president. Therefore, this study is an attempt to fill that gap. Two hundred questionnaires were distributed using non-probability purposive sampling. Data analysis was carried out using the structural equation modeling (SEM) approach. The results showed that attitude and behavior control were positively related to voters' intention to elect presidential candidates. Furthermore, information from social media also has a positive relationship with the attitude of choosing presidential candidates. However, the results also show that subjective norms do not have a significant relationship with voters' intention. This study contributes knowledge to researchers, practitioners, and policymakers about the factors that influence youth intention to vote in Indonesia, namely, attitudes, perceived behavior control, and information from social media.
Keywords
Theory of Planned Behavior; Social Media; Election; Indonesia;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Sekarwulan, A., Azzahra, A. A., Syifafasya, N., & Safitri, D. (2020). The Use of Social Media for the Participation of UNJ Communication Science Students in Determining the 2019 Presidential Candidates and Cawapres. Kanal: Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 8(2), 50-57.   DOI
2 Setyawan, A., Noermijati, N. Sunaryo, S., & Aisjah, S. (2018). Green Product Buying Intentions Among Young Consumers: Extending the Application of Theory of Planned Behavior. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 16(2), 145-154. https://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.16(2).2018.13   DOI
3 Setyawan, A. (2019). Let's Succeed in the 2019 Democracy Party. Available at https://setkab.go.id/mari-sukseskan-pesta-demokrasi-2019/
4 Sihombing, S. O. (2017). Predicting intention to share news through social media: An empirical analysis in Indonesian youth context. Business and Economic Horizons, 13(4), 468-477. http://dx.doi.org/10.15208/beh.2017.32   DOI
5 Sihombing, S. O. (2011). Understanding Knowledge Sharing Behavior: an Examintai8on of the Extended Theory of Planned Behavior. Journal the Winners, 12(1), 24-39. https://doi.org/10.21512/tw.v12i1.681   DOI
6 Skelton, T. (2010). Taking young people as political actors seriously: Opening the borders of political geography. Area, 42(2), 145-151. Retrieved July 20, 2020, from www.jstor.org/stable/27801455. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4762.2009.00891.x   DOI
7 Smidt, C. (2017). Polarization and the Decline of the American Floating Voter. American Journal of Political Science, 61(2), 365-381. Retrieved July 17, 2020, from www.jstor.org/stable/26384737. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12218   DOI
8 Connee, M., & Armitage, C. J. (1998). Extending the Theory of Planned Behavior: A Review and Avenues for Further Research. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28(15), 1429-1464. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1998.tb01685.x   DOI
9 Dasli, Y. (2019). Use of Social Media as a Tool for Political Communication in the Field of Politics. Ordu University Journal of Social Science Research, 9(1), 243-251.
10 Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and End User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, 13, 318-339. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008   DOI
11 Soebagio, H. (2008). Implications of the White Group in the Perspective of Democratic Development in Indonesia. Makara, Sosial Humaniora, 12(2), 82-86.
12 Soh, P., Koay, K. Y., & Lim, V. K. G. (2018). Understanding Cyberloafing by Students through the Lens of an Extended Theory of Planned Behavior. First Monday, https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v23i6.7837   DOI
13 DeJonckheere, M., Fisher, A., & Chang, T. How has the presidential election affected young Americans? Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health, 12(8). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13034-018-0214-7   DOI
14 De Jong, A. (2019). Indonesia's Election and Polarization. International Viewpoint - Online Socialist Magazine. Available at http://www.internationalviewpoint.org/spip.php?article6137
15 Dedi, A. (2019). Analysis of the 2019 Concurrent General Election System. Jurnal Moderat, 5(3), 213-226. http://dx.doi.org/10.25147/moderat.v5i3.2676   DOI
16 Deng, L., Yang, M., & Marcoulides, K.M. (2018). Structural Equation Modeling with Many Variables; a Sstematic Review of Issues and Developments. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 580. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsy.2018.00580   DOI
17 Elliott, M., & Speck, P. (2005). Factors That Affect Attitude toward a Retail Web Site. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 13(1), 40-51. Retrieved July 27, 2020, from www.jstor.org/stable/40470185 https://doi.org/10.1080/10696679.2005.11658537   DOI
18 Evelyn, E., & Basana, S. R. (2018). Effect of 2008 and 2016 U. S. Presidential Election in the Indonesian Stock Market. Jurnal Manajemen dan Kewirausahaan, 20(1), 16-22. https://dx.doi.org/10.9744/jmk.20.1.16-22   DOI
19 Khodijah, S. N., & Yusuf, A. (2019). Comparative Study of Implicit Attitude Evaluation with Intention to Choose 2019 Presidential Election Candidates (Jokowi-Amin, Prabowo-Sandi, and Golput) in University of Indonesia Students. Jurnal KSM Eka Prasetya UI, 1(3).
20 Kardashian, K. (2019). Three Social Media Themes to Watch in 2020. Retrieved from: https://www.tuck.dartmouth.edu/news/articles/three-social-media-themes-to-watch
21 Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford.
22 Lestari, E. Y., & Arumsari, N. (2018). Political Participation of Beginner Voters in Semarang Mayor Election in Semarang City. Integralistik, 1(XXIX), 63-72.
23 Liao, C., Lin, H., & Liu, Y. (2010). Predicting the Use of Pirated Software: A Contingency Model Integrating Perceived Risk with the Theory of Planned Behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 91(2), 237-252. Retrieved July 27, 2020, from www.jstor.org/stable/27749793 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0081-5   DOI
24 Lutz, R. (1978). Attitude Change or Attitude Formation? An Unanswered Question: Rejoinder. Journal of Consumer Research, 4(4), 276-278. https://doi.org/10.1086/208708   DOI
25 Liew, A. (2007). Understanding Data, Information, Knowledge and Their Inter-Relationships. Journal of Knowledge Management Practice, 8(2). http://www.tlainc.com/articl134.htm
26 Londono-Roldan, J. C, Davies, K., & Elms, J. (2017). Extending the Theory of Planned Behavior to examine the role of anticipated negative emotions on channel intention: The case of an embarrassing product. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 36, 8-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2016.12.002   DOI
27 Luc, P. T. (2020). Outcome Expectations and Social Entrepreneurial Intention: Integration of Planned Behavior and Social Cognitive Career Theory. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 7(6), 399-407. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2020.vol7.no6.399   DOI
28 Takahashi, T. (2019). Indonesia's presidential election puts SE Asia's democracy to the test, Retrieved from https://asia.nikkei.com/Spotlight/Comment/Indonesia-s-presidential-electionputs-SE-Asia-s-democracy-to-the-test2
29 Sommer, L. (2011). The Theory of Planned Behavior and the Impact of Past Behavior. International Business & Economics Research Journal, 19(1), 98-110. https://dx.doi.org/10.19030/iber.v10i1.930   DOI
30 Taber, K. S. (2018). The Use of Cronbach's Alpha When Developing and Reporting Research Instruments in Science Education. Research in Science Education, 48, 1273-1296. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2   DOI
31 Triwibowo, W. (2019). Preventing Political Polarization after the 2019 Presidential Election is Sharpening. https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2019/04/23/13291151/mencegah-polarisasi-politik-pasca-pilpres-2019-semakin-tajam?page=all
32 Utami, P. D. P., & Rahyuda, K. (2019). International Research Journal of Management, IT & Social Sciences, 6(4), 107-117. https://dx.doi.org/10.21744/irjmis.v6n4.663   DOI
33 Vonderschmitt, K. (2012). The Growing Use of Social Media in Political Campaigns: How to use Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube to Create an Effective Social Media Campaign. Honors College Capstone Experience/ Thesis Projects. Paper 360. http://digitalcommons.wku.edu/stu_hon_theses/360
34 Wanasida, A. S., Bernarto, I., Sudibjo, N., & Pramono, R. (2021). Millennial Transformational Leadership on Organizational Performance in Indonesia Fishery Startup. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 8(2), 555-562. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2021.vol8.no2.0555   DOI
35 Wang, L., & Zhang, Y. (2016). An extended version of the theory of planned behaviour: the role of self-efficacy and past behaviour in predicting the physical activity of Chinese adolescents. Journal of Sports Sciences, 34(7), 587-597. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2015.1064149   DOI
36 Gangwal, N., & Bansal, V. (2016). Application of Decomposed Theory of Planned Behavior for M-commerce Adoption in India. In: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems (ICEIS 2016), 2, 357-367. https://dx.doi.org/10.5220/0005627503570367   DOI
37 Fatayati, S. (2017). The Relevance of Election Principles as Efforts to Create Democratic Elections with Integrity. Tribakti: Jurnal Pemikiran KeIslaman, 28(1), 147-165. https://doi.org/10.33367/tribakti.v28i1.472   DOI
38 Fata, M. K. (2018). Reading the Polarization of Santri in the Presidential Election Contest 2019. Jurnal Dinamika Penelitian: Media Komunikasi Sosial Keagamaan, 18(02), 325-346.
39 Foltz, B., Newkirk, H. E. & Schwager, P. H. (2016). An Empirical Investigation of Factors that Influence Individual Behavior toward Changing Social Networking Security Settings. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 11(2), 1-15. https://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-18762016000200002   DOI
40 Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312   DOI
41 Gunadi, A. P., & Sihombing, S. O. (2015). Prediction of Actual E-Toll Card Use with Structural Model Equation Approach. Jurnal Manajemen Teknologi, 14(2), 151-172. https://doi.org/10.12695/jmt.2015.14.2.3   DOI
42 Guo, S., & Lee, C. K. (2007). Statistical power of SEM in social work research: Challenges and strategies. Paper presented at the Eleventh Annual Conference of the Society of Social Work Research. San Francisco.
43 Ha, N. T., Nguyen, T. L. H., Nguyen, T. P. L., & Nguyen, T. D. (2019). The Effect of Trust on Consumers' Online Purchase Intention: An Integration of TAM and TPB. Management Science Letters, 9, 1451-1460. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.msl.2019.5.006   DOI
44 Mette, K., & Bertolini, K. (2018). Fear, Anxiety, and the 2016 Presidential Election: What are the Effects on Student Achievement? Empowering Research for Educators, 2(1), 28-36. Available at: https://openprairie.sdstate.edu/ere/vol2/iss1/5, 28-36
45 Moons, I., & De Pelsmacker, P. (2015). An Extended Decomposed Theory of Planned Behaviour to Predict the Usage Intention of the Electric Car: A Multi-Group Comparison. Sustainability, 7, 6212-6245. https://doi.org/10.3390/su7056212   DOI
46 Morissan. (2016). Level of Political and Social Participation of the Young Generation. Jurnal Visi Komunikasi, 15(01), 96-113.
47 Munzir, A., Asmawi, A., & Zetra, A. (2019) Various Roles of Social Media in Political World in Indonesia. JPPUMA: Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan dan Sosial Politik UMA (Journal of Governance and Political Social UMA), 7(2), 173-182.
48 Natalia, E., & Sihombing, S. O. (2018). The Relationship between Entrepreneurship Education and Mentoring toward Entrepreneurship Intention. Jurnal Manajemen, XXII (03), 340-359. https://doi.org/10.24912/jm.v22i3.426   DOI
49 Natsir, M., & Ridha, M. (2018). Stuck in Electoralism: Notes on Indonesian Democracy in the Last Two Decades. Jurnal Politik Profetik, 6(2), 234-248.
50 Newman, B. I. (1985). An Historical Review of the Voter as a Consumer. In: Sheth, J. N. and Tan, C. T. (Eds.), SV - Historical Perspective in Consumer Research: National and International Perspectives. Singapore: Association for Consumer Research, 257-261
51 Maichum, K., Parichatnon, S., & Peng, K. (2017). Developing an Extended Theory of Planned Behavior Model to Investigate Consumers; Consumption Behavior toward Organic Food: A Case Study in Thailand. International Journal of Scientific of Technology Research, 6(1), 72-80.
52 Masters, J. (2018). Russia, Trump, and the 2016 U.S. Election. Available at https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/russia-trump-and-2016-us-election
53 McFarland, D., & Thomas, R. (2006). Bowling Young: How Youth Voluntary Associations Influence Adult Political Participation. American Sociological Review, 71(3), 401-425. https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240607100303   DOI
54 Nwolise, O. B. C. (2007). Electoral Violence and Nigeria's 2007 Elections. Journal of African Elections, 6(2), 155-179. https://doi.org/10.20940/JAE/2007/v6i2a9   DOI
55 Obradovic, S., & Tomic, N. (2017). The Effect of Presidential Election in the USA on Stock Return Flow - A Study of a Political Event. Journal Economic Research, 30(1), 112-124. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2017.1305802   DOI
56 O'Cass, A., & Pecotich, A. (2005). The Dynamics of Voter Behavior and Influence Processes in Electoral Markets: A Consumer Behavior Perspective. Journal of Business Research, 58, 406-413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2003.08.003   DOI
57 Park, J. Y., Chiu, W., & Won, D. (2017). Sustainability of Exercise Behavior in Seniors: An Application of the Extended Theory of Planned Behavior. Journal of Physical Education and Sport, 17(1), 342-347.
58 Parkinson, J., Russell-Bennett, R., & Previte, J. (2018). Challenging the Planned Behavior Approach in Social Marketing: Emotion and Experience Matter. European Journal of Marketing, 52(3/4), 837-865. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-05-2016-0309   DOI
59 Patiro, S., & Sihombing, S. (2016). Predicting Intention to Purchase Counterfeit Products: Extending the Theory of Planned Behavior. International Research Journal of Business Studies, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.21632/irjbs.7.2.109-120   DOI
60 Peng, N., & Hackley, C. (2009). Are Voters, Consumers? A Qualitative Exploration of the Voter-Consumer. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 12(2), 171-186. https://doi.org/10.1108/13522750910948770   DOI
61 Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (2005). The Influence of Attitudes on Behavior. In: the Handbook of Attitudes. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
62 Abramowitz, A., & Saunders, K. (2008). Is Polarization a Myth? The Journal of Politics, 70(2), 542-555. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381608080493   DOI
63 Adinugroho, B., Prisanto, G. F., Irwansyah, & Ernungtyas, N. F. (2019). Social Media and the Internet in Political and Election Information Involvement. Jurnal Representamen, 5(2), 80-95.
64 Ajzen, I. (2006). Constructing a TpB Questionnaire: Conceptual and Methodological Considerations. Retrieved June 27, 2011 from the World Wide Web: http://www.people.umass.edu/aizen/pdf/tpb.measurement.pdf
65 Azjen, I. (1991). The Theory of Planned Behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T   DOI
66 Ajzen, I. (1988). From Intentions to Actions: Attitudes, Personality, & Behavior. Chicago: Dorsey Press.
67 Arifianto, A. R., Pepinsky, T., Laksmana, E. A., Anwar, D. F., & Murphy, A. M. (2019). Indonesia after the 2019 Election. Asia Policy, 14(4), 43-87.
68 Beck, J. W. and Shen, W. (2018). The Effects of Presidential Elections on Work Engagement and Job Performance. Applied Psychology, 68(3), 547-576. https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12167   DOI
69 Hagger, M. S. (2019). The reasoned action approach and the theories of reasoned action and planned behavior. In: Dunn, D. S. (Ed.), Oxford Bibliographies in Psychology. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. https://dx.doi/10.1093/OBO/9780199828340-0240   DOI
70 Biswas, A., Ingle, N. & Roy, M. (2014). Influence of Social Media on Voting Behavior. Journal of Power, Politics & Governance, 2(2), 127-155.
71 Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
72 Hair, J. F, Money, A. H., Samouel, P., & Page, M. (2007). Research Methods for Business. Chichester, UK: John Wiley and Sons.
73 Hansen, E. R., & Tyner, A. (2018). Educational Attainment and Social Norms of Voting. Presented in the Annual Meeting of The American Political Science, August 20-September 2, Available at https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5b953c5f9d5abb8c51d6d8c6/t/5b957f1203ce64eefd1fba92/1536524051067/Hansen_Tyner_Norms_Voting.pdf
74 Harris, L., & Harrigan, P. (2015). Social Media in Politics: The Ultimate Voter Engagement Tool or Simply an Echo Chamber? Journal of Political Marketing, 14(3), 251-283. https://doi.org/10.1080/15377857.2012.693059   DOI
75 Ratnamulyani, I. A., & Maksudi, B. I. (2018). The Role of Social Media in Increasing Participation of Beginner Voters Among Students in Bogor Regency. Sosiohumaniora, 20(2), 154-161.
76 Raut, R. K., Das, N., & Kumar, R. (2018). Extending the Theory of Planned Behavior: Impact of Past Behavioral Biases on the Investment Decision of Indian Investor. Asian Journal of Business and Accounting, 11(1), 265-291. https://doi.org/10.22452/ajba.vol11no1.9   DOI
77 Sagita, V. D. (2017). Trump's Elected Shock Effect in Indonesian Stock Market. Journal of Indonesian Applied Economics, 7(1), 71-83. https://dx.doi.org/10.21776/ub.jiae.2017.007.01.5   DOI
78 Saputra, T., & Sihombing, S. (2018). Application of the Theory of Planned Behavior for Predicting the Intention of International Entrepreneurship: Global Mindset and Cultural Intelligence as Moderation Variables. Asia Pacific Management and Business Application, 7(2), 59-80. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.apmba.2018.007.02.1   DOI
79 Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2019). Research Methods for Business. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
80 Shen, C., Bui, D. G., & Lin, C. (2017). Do political factors affect stock returns during presidential elections? Journal of International Money and Finance, 77(C), 180-198. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jimonfin.2017.07.019   DOI
81 Petrillo, L. (2016). Presidential Election Is Stressing Out Workers, Hurting Productivity. https://www.shrm.org/resourcesandtools/hr-topics/employee-relations/pages/politics-at-work-.aspx
82 William, D. R., & Medlock, M. M. (2017). Health Effect of Dramatic Societal Events - Ramifications of the Recent Presidential Election. The New England Journal of Medicine, 376, 2295-2299. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMms1702111   DOI
83 Harymawan, I., Nasih, M., Suhardianto, N., & Shauki, E. (2020). How does the presidential election period affect the performance of the state-owned enterprise in Indonesia? Cogent Business & Management, 7(1), 1750330. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2020.1750330   DOI
84 Hasbullah, N., Mahajar, A. J., & Salleh, M. I. (2014). A conceptual framework of extending the theory of planned behavior: the role of service quality and trust in the consumer cooperatives. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 5(12), 142-148.
85 Hansen, T., & Jensen, J. M. (2007). Understanding Voters' Decisions: A Theory of Planned Behaviour Approach. Innovative Marketing, 3(4), 87-93.
86 Rameez, M., & Kulthunga, D. (2019). Customers' Online Purchase Intention: Applying Extended Theory of Planned Behavior Model. Information and Knowledge Management, 9(10), 23-36.
87 Wang, E. (2010). The Effects of Browsing Frequency and Gender on the Relationship between Perceived Control and Patronage Intentions in E-tail. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 14(3), 129-144. Retrieved July 27, 2020, from www.jstor.org/stable/20749974   DOI
88 Warburton, E. (2019). Polarisation in Indonesia: What if Perception is Reality. Available at https://www,newmandala.org/how-polarised-is-indonesia/
89 Weeks, B. E., Ardevol-Abreu, A., & de Zuniga, H. G. (2017). Online Influence? Social Media Use, Opinion Leadership, and Political Persuasion, International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 29(2), 214-239. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edv050   DOI
90 Botetzagias, I., Dima, A. & Malesios, C. (2015). Extending the Theory of Planned Behavior in the Context of Recycling: The role of Moral Norms and of Demographic Predictors. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 95, 58-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2014.12.004   DOI
91 Bright, J., Hale, S., Ganesh, B., Bulovsky, A., Margetts, H., & Howard, P. (2019). Does Campaigning on Social Media Make a Difference? Evidence from Candidate Use of Twitter During the 2015 and 2017 U.K. Elections. Communication Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650219872394   DOI
92 Byrne, B. (2010). Structural Equation Modeling with Amos (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.
93 Chen, M., & Tung, P. (2014). Developing an Extended Theory of Planned Behavior Model to Predict Consumers' Intention to Visit Green Hotels. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 36, 221-230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2013.09.006   DOI
94 Chieo, W., Mayer, R.W., & Wang, Z. (2014). Stock Market, Economic Performance, and Presidential Elections. Journal of Business & Economics Research, 12(2), 159-170. https://dx.doi.org/10.19030/jber.v12i2.8530   DOI
95 Chyung, S. Y., Roberts, K., Swanson, I., & Hankinson, A. (2017). Evidence-Based Survey Design: The Use of a Midpoint on the Likert Scale. Performance Improvement, 56(10), 15-23. https://doi.org/10.1002/pfi.21727   DOI
96 Wolf, E. J., Harrington, K. M., Clark, S. L., & Miller, M. W. (2013). Sample Size Requirements for Structural Equation Models: An Evaluation of Power, Bias, and Solution Propriety. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 76(6), 913-934. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164413495237   DOI
97 Wu, W. Y., Do, T. Y., Nguyen, P. T., Anridoh, N., & Vu, M. Q. (2020) An Integrated Framework of Customer-based Brand Equity and Theory of Planned Behavior: A Meta-analysis Approach. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 7(8), 371-381. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2020.vol7.no8.371   DOI
98 Xin,Z., Liang,M., Zhanyou,W., & Hua,X. (2019). Psychosocial factors influencing shared bicycle travel choices among Chinese: An application of theory planned behavior. PLOS ONE, 14(1), e0210964. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0210964   DOI
99 Chiu, Y., Chou, Y., Chang, Y., Chu, C., Lin, F., Lai, C., Hwang, S., Fang, W., & Kao, S. (2019). Using an Extended Theory of Planned Behavior to Predict Smoking Cessation Counsellors' Intentions to Offer Smoking Cessation Support in the Taiwanese Military, BMJ Open. Retrieved from: https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/bmjopen/9/5/e026203.full.pdf
100 Cho, E., & Son, J. (2019). The effect of social connectedness on consumer adoption of social commerce in apparel shopping. Fashion and Textiles, 6(14). https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40691-019-0171-7   DOI
101 Imelda, I., Siregar, H., & Anggraeni, L. (2014). Abnormal Returns and Trading Volume in the Indonesian Stock Market in Relation to the Presidential Elections in 2004, 2009, and 2014. Bisnis & Birokrasi Journal, 21(2), 64-76. https://doi.org/10.20476/jbb.v21i2.4319   DOI
102 Hasyim, S. (2018). The Role of Millennial Generation in Determining Victory in the Presidential Election 2019. Available at https://www.matamatapolitik.com/peran-generasi-milenial-dalam-menentukan-kemenangan-di-pilpres-2019/
103 Hsu, M., Chang, C., Lin, H., & Lin, Y. (2015). Determinants of Continued Use of Social Media: The Uses and Gratifications Theory and Perceived Interactivity. Information Research, 20(2). Available at http://informationr.net/ir/20-2/paper671.html#.XlXju0pS_IU
104 Hussein, Z. (2017). Leading to Intention: The Role of Attitude in Relation to Technology Acceptance Model in E-Learning. Procedia Computer Science, 105, 159-164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2017.01.196   DOI
105 Kaplan, A. M., & Haenlein, M. (2010). Users of the World, Unite! The Challenges and Opportunities of social media. Business Horizons, 53(1), 59-68.   DOI
106 Irawanto, B. (2019). Young and Faithless: Wooing Millenials in Indonesia's 2019 Presidential Election. ISEAS Perspective, 1, 1-10.
107 Jacoby, J., Morrin, M., Jaccard, J., Gurhan, Z., Kuss, A., & Maheswaran, D. (2002). Mapping Attitude Formation as a Function of Information Input: Online Processing Models of Attitude Formation. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 12(1), 21-34. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327663JCP1201_03   DOI
108 Jones, D. (2015). Partisan Polarization and the Effect of Congressional Performance Evaluations on Party Brands and American Elections. Political Research Quarterly, 68(4), 785-801. Retrieved July 14, 2020, from www.jstor.org/stable/24637816   DOI