Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2021.vol8.no4.0249

The Impact of Market Discipline on Charter Value of Commercial Banks: Empirical Evidence from Pakistan Stock Exchange  

AKHTAR, Muhammad Naveed (Department of Accounting and Logistics, School of Business and Economics, Linnaeus University)
SALEEM, Sana (Lahore School of Business, University of Lahore, Gujrat Campus)
Publication Information
The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business / v.8, no.4, 2021 , pp. 249-261 More about this Journal
Abstract
To tranquilize the devastating impact of unnecessary risk-taking behavior of banks towards the economy for maximizing their profits that usually arises due to widely known 'moral-hazard' problem originating from market competition and intensified by bank's limited liability, the banking system is strongly monitored across all countries of the world. The goal of controlling would become more feasible if there exist some self-discipline and motivations which could safeguard the banks' charter value through the mechanism of market discipline. Therefore, our study is aimed to scrutinize the relation between market discipline and charter value of local commercial banks that are registered on the Pakistan Stock Exchange by analyzing a balanced panel data from the year 2007 to 2019. Deposit growth, interbank deposits, and subordinate debt are taken as proxies to measure market discipline whereas Tobin's Q theory is applied for calculating the charter value. Generalized Least Square Regression with Fixed Effect Model is used for evaluation. The outcomes reveal that in the existence of control variables, all proxies of market discipline have a significant positive impact on bank charter value. Our research has important policy implications for monitoring and supervising financial intermediaries for their stability and soundness by offsetting the complications of moral-hazard in the financial systems.
Keywords
Moral Hazard; Market Discipline; Bank Charter Value; Tobin's Q Theory; Commercial Banks; Pakistan;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Angkinand, A. P., Sawangngoenyuang, W., & Wihlborg, C. (2010). Financial liberalization and banking crises: A cross‐country analysis. International Review of Finance, 10(2), 263-292. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2443.2010.01114.x   DOI
2 Baele, L., De Jonghe, O., & Vander Vennet, R. (2007). Does the stock market value bank diversification?. Journal of Banking & Finance, 31(7), 1999-2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2006.08.003   DOI
3 Bakkar, Y., Rugemintwari, C., & Tarazi, A. (2017). Charter value and bank stability before and after the global financial crisis of 2007-2008. SSRN Online Journal, 45-76. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2800616   DOI
4 Banna, H., Ahmad, R., & Koh, E. H. (2017). Determinants of commercial banks' efficiency in Bangladesh: Does crisis matter?. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics, and Business, 4(3), 19-26. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2017.vol4.no.3.19   DOI
5 Beck, T., Demirguc-Kunt, A., & Levine, R. (2006). Bank concentration, competition, and crises: First results. Journal of Banking & Finance, 30(5), 1581-1603. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2005.05.010   DOI
6 Beyhaghi, M., D'Souza, C., & Roberts, G. S. (2014). Funding advantage and market discipline in the Canadian banking sector. Journal of Banking & Finance, 48, 396-410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2013.08.006   DOI
7 Blum, J. M. (2002). Subordinated debt, market discipline, and banks' risk-taking. Journal of Banking & Finance, 26(7), 1427-1441. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4266(02)00282-0   DOI
8 John, K., Ravid, S. A., & Reisel, N. (2010). The notching rule for subordinated debt and the information content of debt rating. Financial Management, 39(2), 489-513. ttps://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-053X.2010.01081.x   DOI
9 Karas, A., Pyle, W., & Schoors, K. (2013). Deposit insurance, banking crises, and market discipline: Evidence from a natural experiment on deposit flows and rates. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 45(1), 179-200. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1538-4616.2012.00566.x   DOI
10 Kato, P., & Hagendorff, J. (2010). Distance to default, subordinated debt, and distress indicators in the banking industry. Accounting & Finance, 50(4), 853-870. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-629X.2010.00354.x   DOI
11 Keeley, M. C. (1990). Deposit insurance, risk, and market power in banking. The American Economic Review, 45(3), 1183-1200. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2006769
12 King, T. B. (2008). Discipline and liquidity in the interbank market. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 40(2‐3), 295-317. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1538-4616.2008.00114.x   DOI
13 Labonte, M. (2014). Systemically important or "too big to fail" financial institutions (Working Paper R42150). Congressional Research Service. https://hdl.handle.net/1813/77638
14 Le, T. T. D., & Diep, T. T. (2020). The effect of lending structure concentration on credit risk: The evidence of Vietnamese commercial banks. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics, and Business, 7(7), 59-72. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2020.vol7.no7.059   DOI
15 Iyer, R., Puri, M., & Ryan, N. (2016). A tale of two runs: Depositor responses to bank solvency risk. The Journal of Finance, 71(6), 2687-2726. https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.12424   DOI
16 Coskun, Y. (2016). Fundamentals of market discipline and custody risk management. Journal of Securities Operations & Custody, 8(2), 163-175. https://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/hsp/jsoc/2016/00000008/00000002/art00012
17 Bollen, B., Skully, M., Tripe, D., & Wei, X. (2015). The global financial crisis and its impact on Australian bank risk. International Review of Finance, 15(1), 89-111. https://doi.org/10.1111/irfi.12041   DOI
18 Chen, Y., & Hasan, I. (2011). Subordinated debt, market discipline, and bank risk. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 43(6), 1043-1072. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1538-4616.2011.00417.x   DOI
19 Chernykh, L., & R. A. Cole (2011). Does deposit insurance improve financial intermediation? Evidence from the Russian experiment. Journal of Banking & Finance 35(2): 388-402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2010.08.014   DOI
20 Cubillas, E., Fonseca, A. R., & Gonzalez, F. (2012). Banking crises and market discipline: International evidence. Journal of Banking & Finance, 36(8), 2285-2298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2012.04.011   DOI
21 Cuong, L. K., & Vinh, V. X. (2019). Interbank financing and business cycle in Europe. Journal of Economic Studies, 5(7), 118-136. https://doi.org/10.1108/JES-08-2016-0148   DOI
22 De Jonghe, O., & Vander Vennet, R. (2008). Competition versus efficiency: What drives franchise values in European banking? Journal of Banking & Finance, 32(9), 1820-1835. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2007.12.009   DOI
23 Pathan, S., Haq, M., & Williams, B. (2016). Does skin in the game help? Bank franchise value, managerial incentives, and 'going for broke'. Australian Journal of Management, 41(2), 271-298. https://doi.org/10.1177/0312896214539818   DOI
24 Martinez Peria, M. S., & Schmukler, S. L. (2001). Do depositors punish banks for bad behavior? Market discipline, deposit insurance, and banking crises. The Journal of Finance, 56(3), 1029-1051. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-1082.00354   DOI
25 De Rynck, S. (2016). Banking on a union: The politics of changing eurozone banking supervision. Journal of European Public Policy, 23(1), 119-135. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2015.1019551   DOI
26 Demirguc-Kunt, A., & Huizinga, H. (2004). Market discipline and deposit insurance. Journal of Monetary Economics, 51(2), 375-399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmoneco.2003.04.001   DOI
27 Mercieca, S., Schaeck, K., & Wolfe, S. (2007). Small European banks: Benefits from diversification?. Journal of Banking & Finance, 31(7), 1975-1998. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2007.01.004   DOI
28 Naz, M., & Ayub, H. (2017). Impact of risk-related disclosure on the risk-taking behavior of commercial banks in Pakistan. Journal of Independent Studies & Research: Management & Social Sciences & Economics, 15(2), 125-146. https://doi.org/10.31384/jisrmsse/2017.15.2.9   DOI
29 Neumark, D., & Sharpe, S. A. (1992). Market structure and the nature of price rigidity: Evidence from the market for consumer deposits. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107(2), 657-680. https://doi.org/10.2307/2118485   DOI
30 Nier, E., & Baumann, U. (2006). Market discipline, disclosure, and moral hazard in banking. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 15(3), 332-361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfi.2006.03.001   DOI
31 Purwono, R., Nugroho, R. Y. Y., & Mubin, M. K. (2019). Response on new credit program in Indonesia: An asymmetric information perspective. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics, and Business, 6(2), 33-44. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2019.vol6.no2.33   DOI
32 Rudolph, D. M. (2020). Moral hazard during the financial crisis of 2008 and future implications for the United States (Doctoral dissertation, Duke University Durham). https://sites.duke.edu/honorsthesis2020/files/2020/04/Dylan-Rudolph-Honors-Thesis.pdf
33 Flannery, M. J. (2001). The faces of "market discipline". Journal of Financial Services Research, 20(2), 107-119. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012455806431   DOI
34 Dinger, V., & Von Hagen, J. (2009). Does interbank borrowing reduce bank risk? Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 41(2-3), 491-506. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1538-4616.2009.00217.x   DOI
35 Distinguin, I., Kouassi, T., & Tarazi, A. (2013). Interbank deposits and market discipline: Evidence from Central and Eastern Europe. Journal of Comparative Economics, 41(2), 544-560. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2012.07.005   DOI
36 Flannery, M. J. (1998). Using market information in prudential bank supervision: A review of the US empirical evidence. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 11(2), 273-305. https://doi.org/10.2307/2601102   DOI
37 Fonseca, A. R., & Gonzalez, F. (2010). How bank capital buffers vary across countries: The influence of cost of deposits, market power, and bank regulation. Journal of Banking & Finance, 34(4), 892-902. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2009.09.020   DOI
38 Goyal, V. K. (2005). The market discipline of bank risk: Evidence from subordinated debt contracts. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 14(3), 318-350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfi.2004.06.002   DOI
39 Freixas, X., Parigi, B. M., & Rochet, J. C. (2000). Systemic risk, interbank relations, and liquidity provision by the central bank. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 9(1), 611-638. https://doi.org/10.2307/2601198   DOI
40 Ghosh, S. (2009). Charter value and risk-taking: Evidence from Indian banks. Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy, 14(3), 270-286. https://doi.org/10.1080/13547860902975606   DOI
41 Tabash, M. I. (2019). An empirical investigation on the relation between disclosure and financial performance of Islamic banks in the United Arab Emirates. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics, and Business, 6(4), 27-35. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2029.vol6.no4.27   DOI
42 Saleem, S., & Usman, M. (2021). Information risk and cost of equity: The role of stock price crash risk. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics, and Business, 8(1), 623-635. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2021.vol8.no1.623   DOI
43 Stephanou, C. (2010). Rethinking market discipline in banking: lessons from the financial crisis. Washington DC: The World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-5227   DOI
44 Stiroh, K. J., & Rumble, A. (2006). The dark side of diversification: The case of US financial holding companies. Journal of Banking & Finance, 30(8), 2131-2161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2005.04.030   DOI
45 Tran, S. H., & Nguyen, L. T. (2020). Financial development, business cycle, and bank risk in Southeast Asian countries. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics, and Business, 7(3), 127-135. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2020.vol7.no3.127   DOI
46 Uchida, H., & Satake, M. (2009). Market discipline and bank efficiency. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions, and Money, 19(5), 792-802. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intfin.2009.02.003   DOI
47 Usman, H. (2015). Customers trust Islamic banks in Indonesia. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics, and Business, 2(1), 5-13. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2015.vol2.no1.5.   DOI
48 Yan, X., Skully, M., Avram, K., & Vu, T. (2014). Market discipline and deposit guarantee: Evidence from Australian Banks. International Review of Finance, 14(3), 431-457. https://doi.org/10.1111/irfi.12028   DOI
49 Affinito, M. (2012). Do interbank customer relationships exist? And how did they function in the crisis? Learning from Italy. Journal of Banking & Finance, 36(12), 3163-3184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2011.11.016   DOI
50 Admati, A. R., & Pfleiderer, P. C. (2010). Increased-liability equity: A proposal to improve capital regulation of large financial institutions (Working Paper 68 & Business Research Paper 2043). Rocket Center for Corporate Governance & Stanford University Graduate School of Business. https://admati.people.stanford.edu/sites/g/files/sbiybj1846/f/publications/ssrnid1532484.pdf
51 Afzal, A., Mirza, N., & Arshad, F. (2020). Market discipline in South Asia: Evidence from the commercial banking sector. International Journal of Finance & Economics, 6(11), 14-23. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijfe.1904   DOI
52 Afzal, A., & Mirza, N. (2011). Market discipline in commercial banking: Evidence from the market for bank equity. The Lahore Journal of Economics, 16, 233-254. https://doi.org/10.35536/lje.2011.v16.isp.a10   DOI
53 Allen, D. E., & Powell, R. (2012). The fluctuating default risk of Australian banks. Australian Journal of Management, 37(2), 297-325. https://doi.org/10.1177/0312896211432369   DOI
54 Hamid, F. S., & Yunus, N. M. (2017). Market discipline and bank risk-taking: Evidence from the East Asian banking sector. East Asian Economic Review, 21(1), 29-57. https://doi/10.11644/kiep.eaer.2017.21.1.322   DOI
55 Ha, D. V. (2019). The interactive relationship between credit growth and operational self-sustainability of people's credit funds in the Mekong delta region of Vietnam. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics, and Business, 6(3), 55-65. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2019.vol6.no3.55   DOI
56 Hagendorff, J., & Keasey, K. (2009). Post‐merger strategy and performance: Evidence from the US and European banking industries. Accounting & Finance, 49(4), 725-751. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-629X.2009.00306.x   DOI
57 Hakenes, H., & Schnabel, I. (2011). Bank size and risk-taking under Basel II. Journal of Banking & Finance, 35(6), 1436-1449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2010.10.031   DOI
58 Hunjra, A. I., Zureigat, Q., & Mehmood, R. (2020). Impact of capital regulation and market discipline on capital ratio selection: A cross-country study. International Journal of Financial Studies, 8(2), 21. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijfs8020021   DOI
59 Haq, M., Avkiran, N. K., & Tarazi, A. (2019). Does market discipline impact bank charter value? The case for Australia and Canada. Accounting & Finance, 59(1), 253-276. https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.12244   DOI
60 Haq, M., Faff, R., Seth, R., & Mohanty, S. (2014). Disciplinary tools and bank risk exposure. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 26, 37-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2013.10.005   DOI
61 Islam, M. S., & Nishiyama, S. I. (2019). Non-performing loans of commercial banks in South Asian countries: Adverse selection and moral hazard issues. Asian Economic and Financial Review, 9(9), 1091-1106. https://doi:10.18488/journal.aefr.2019.99.1091.1106   DOI
62 Allen, L., & Rai, A. (1996). Bank charter values and capital levels: An international comparison. Journal of Economics and Business, 48(3), 269-284. https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-6195(96)00013-6   DOI
63 Zhang, Z., Song, W., Sun, X., & Shi, N. (2014). Subordinated debt as an instrument of market discipline: Risk sensitivity of sub-debt yield spreads in UK banking. Journal of Economics and Business, 73, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconbus.2013.11.002   DOI