Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2021.vol8.no2.1189

Perceived Enjoyment, Application Self-efficacy, and Subjective Norms as Determinants of Behavior Intention in Using OVO Applications  

WINARNO, Wahyu Agus (Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Jember)
MAS'UD, Imam (Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Jember)
PALUPI, Trias Widya (Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Jember)
Publication Information
The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business / v.8, no.2, 2021 , pp. 1189-1200 More about this Journal
Abstract
This study examines the role of perceived enjoyment, self-efficacy, and subjective norms as determinants of behavioral intention to use the OVO application. This study's target population is the users of the OVO application who have used it as an electronic transaction. This study's population was the OVO application users as an electronic transaction tool in Jember Regency. Samples were randomly selected at the time of the survey with specific criteria. The survey location is determined at the Plaza because it is a shopping center that mostly has payments at OVO partner merchants. The model empirically tested using data gathered from 150 respondents of OVO users. The research model was tested by using the structural equation modeling (SEM) approach. The results showed that all constructs in the original TAM model were statistically significant. Subjective norm has a positive effect on perceived usefulness, and perceived enjoyment positively affects perceived ease of use of OVO applications. On the other hand, applications' self-efficacy does not affect the perceived ease of using OVO applications for electronic transactions. This condition shows that subjective norms are dominant external individual perspectives compared to self-efficacy, which are personal internal characteristics in determining the behavioral intention of using OVO applications in electronic transactions.
Keywords
Perceived Enjoyment; Self-efficacy; Subjective Norm; Technology Acceptance Model; OVO Applications;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Damghanian, H., Zarei, A., & Siahsarani Kojuri, M. A. (2016). Impact of Perceived Security on Trust, Perceived Risk, and Acceptance of Online Banking in Iran. Journal of Internet Commerce, 15(3), 214-238. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15332861.2016.1191052   DOI
2 Aji, H. M., Berakon, I., & Husin, M. M. (2020). COVID-19 and e-wallet usage intention: A multigroup analysis between Indonesia and Malaysia. Cogent Business and Management, 7(1), 1804181. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2020.1804181   DOI
3 Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 50(2), 179-211. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-t   DOI
4 Das, A., & Das, D. (2020). Perception, Adoption, and Pattern of Usage of FinTech Services by Bank Customers: Evidences from Hojai District of Assam. Emerging Economy Studies, 6(1), 7-22. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/2394901520907728   DOI
5 Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/249008   DOI
6 Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models. Management Science, 35(8), 982-1003. doi:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982   DOI
7 Haqqi, F. R., & Suzianti, A. (2020). Exploring Risk and Benefit Factors Affecting User Adoption Intention of Fintech in Indonesia. Proceedings of the 3rd Asia Pacific Conference on Research in Industrial and Systems Engineering 2020, 13-18. doi:https://doi.org/10.1145/3400934.3400939   DOI
8 Hasan, B. (2007). Examining the effects of computer self-efficacy and system complexity on technology acceptance. Information Resources Management Journal, 20(3), 76. doi:https://doi.org/10.4018/irmj.2007070106   DOI
9 Ibrahim, M. H., Hussin, S. R., & Hussin, S. H. (2020). Factors Influencing Malaysian Consumers' Intention to Use Quick Response (QR) Mobile Payment. Jurnal Pengurusan, 57. doi:https://doi.org/10.17576/pengurusan-2019-57-02   DOI
10 Jogiyanto, H. M. (2007). Sistem informasi keperilakuan: Yogyakarta: Andi Offset.
11 Kang, Y., Lee, M., & Lee, S. (2014). Service-oriented factors affecting the adoption of smartphones. Journal of technology management innovation, 9(2), 98-117. doi:https://doi.org/10.4067/s0718-27242014000200008   DOI
12 Khairi, M. S., & Baridwan, Z. (2015). An Empirical Study on Organizational Acceptance Accounting Information Systems in Sharia Banking. The International Journal of Accounting and Business Society, 23(1), 97-122.
13 Khoirunnisa. (2019). Top 5 Mobile Payment di Indonesia 2018. Retrieved from https://selular.id/2019/01/top-5-mobilepayment-di-indonesia-2018/
14 Kurniawati, H. A., Arif, A., & Winarno, W. A. (2017). Analisis minat penggunaan mobile banking dengan pendekatan Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) yang telah dimodifikasi. e-Journal Ekonomi Bisnis dan Akuntansi, 4(1), 24-29. doi:https://doi.org/10.19184/ejeba.v4i1.4563   DOI
15 Marangunic, N., & Granic, A. (2015). Technology acceptance model: a literature review from 1986 to 2013. Universal Access in the Information Society, 14(1), 81-95. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-014-0348-1   DOI
16 Mathieson, K. (1991). Predicting user intentions: comparing the technology acceptance model with the theory of planned behavior. Information Systems Research, 2(3), 173-191. doi:https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2.3.173   DOI
17 Muslimah, D. A., & Aisyah, M. N. (2016). Pengaruh computer self-efficacy, subjective norm, dan system quality terhadap penerimaan womunity oleh nasabah WOM finance. Jurnal Profita: Kajian Ilmu Akuntansi, 4(8).
18 Schepers, J., & Wetzels, M. (2007). A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model: Investigating subjective norm and moderation effects. Information & Management, 44(1), 90-103. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2006.10.007   DOI
19 Nguyen Thi, N., & Bui Huy, K. (2020). Behavioral Intention to Accept and Use Banking Service. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 7(11), 393-400. doi:https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2020.vol7.no11.393   DOI
20 Padilla-MeleNdez, A., Del Aguila-Obra, A. R., & Garrido-Moreno, A. (2013). Perceived playfulness, gender differences and technology acceptance model in a blended learning scenario. Computers & Education, 63(4), 306-317. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.12.014   DOI
21 Sipior, J. C., Ward, B. T., & Connolly, R. (2011). The digital divide and t-government in the United States: Using the technology acceptance model to understand usage. European Journal of Information Systems, 20(3), 308-328. doi:https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2010.64   DOI
22 Susilo, A. Z., Prabowo, M. I., Taman, A., Pustikaningsih, A., & Samlawi, A. (2019). A Comparative Study of Factors Affecting User Acceptance of GO-PAY and OVO As a Feature of Fintech Application. Procedia Computer Science, 161, 876-884. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2019.11.195   DOI
23 Teo, A.-C., Tan, G. W.-H., Ooi, K.-B., & Lin, B. (2015). Why consumers adopt mobile payment? A partial least squares structural equation modelling PLS-SEM approach. International Journal of Mobile Communications, 13(5), 478-497. doi:https://doi.org/10.1504/ijmc.2015.070961   DOI
24 Van Anh, N., & Thi Phuong Thao, N. (2020). An Integrated Model of CSR Perception and TAM on Intention to Adopt Mobile Banking. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 7(12), 1073-1087. doi: https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2020.vol7.no12.1073   DOI
25 Yadav, R., & Mahara, T. (2017). An Empirical Study of Consumers Intention to Purchase Wooden Handicraft Items Online: Using Extended Technology Acceptance Model. Global Business Review, 20(2), 1-19. doi:10.1177/0972150917713899   DOI
26 Venkatesh, V., & Bala, H. (2008). Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. Decision sciences, 39(2), 273-315. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.2008.00192.x   DOI
27 Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186-204. doi:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926   DOI
28 Winarno, W. A., & Putra, H. S. (2020). Technology acceptance model of the Indonesian government financial reporting information systems. International Journal of Public Sector Performance Management, 6(1), 68-84. doi:10.1504/IJPSPM.2020.105089   DOI
29 Ampol, N., Busaya, V., & Tanakorn, L. (2020). Causal Factors Affecting Mobile Banking Services Acceptance by Customers in Thailand. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 7(11), 421-428. doi:https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2020.vol7.no11.421   DOI
30 Amelia, E. (2019). Analisis Perilaku Minat Menggunakan Mobile Payment Dengan Pendekatan Technology Acceptance Model 3: Studi Pada Pengguna Aplikasi Pembayaran OVO. Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia,
31 Bogea, F., & Brito, E. P. Z. (2018). Determinants of social media adoption by large companies. Journal of technology management innovation, 13(1), 11-18. doi:https://doi.org/10.4067/s0718-27242018000100011   DOI
32 Chawla, D., & Joshi, H. (2019). Consumer attitude and intention to adopt mobile wallet in India - An empirical study. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 37(7), 1590-1618. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/IJBM-09-2018-0256   DOI
33 Chin, W. W., Johnson, N., & Schwarz, A. (2008). A Fast Form Approach to Measuring Technology Acceptance and other Constructs. MIS Quarterly, 32(4), 687-703. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/25148867   DOI
34 Chuang, L.-M., Liu, C.-C., & Kao, H.-K. (2016). The adoption of fintech service: TAM perspective. International Journal of Management Administrative Sciences, 3(7), 1-15.