1 |
Damghanian, H., Zarei, A., & Siahsarani Kojuri, M. A. (2016). Impact of Perceived Security on Trust, Perceived Risk, and Acceptance of Online Banking in Iran. Journal of Internet Commerce, 15(3), 214-238. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15332861.2016.1191052
DOI
|
2 |
Aji, H. M., Berakon, I., & Husin, M. M. (2020). COVID-19 and e-wallet usage intention: A multigroup analysis between Indonesia and Malaysia. Cogent Business and Management, 7(1), 1804181. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2020.1804181
DOI
|
3 |
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 50(2), 179-211. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-t
DOI
|
4 |
Das, A., & Das, D. (2020). Perception, Adoption, and Pattern of Usage of FinTech Services by Bank Customers: Evidences from Hojai District of Assam. Emerging Economy Studies, 6(1), 7-22. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/2394901520907728
DOI
|
5 |
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
DOI
|
6 |
Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models. Management Science, 35(8), 982-1003. doi:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982
DOI
|
7 |
Haqqi, F. R., & Suzianti, A. (2020). Exploring Risk and Benefit Factors Affecting User Adoption Intention of Fintech in Indonesia. Proceedings of the 3rd Asia Pacific Conference on Research in Industrial and Systems Engineering 2020, 13-18. doi:https://doi.org/10.1145/3400934.3400939
DOI
|
8 |
Hasan, B. (2007). Examining the effects of computer self-efficacy and system complexity on technology acceptance. Information Resources Management Journal, 20(3), 76. doi:https://doi.org/10.4018/irmj.2007070106
DOI
|
9 |
Ibrahim, M. H., Hussin, S. R., & Hussin, S. H. (2020). Factors Influencing Malaysian Consumers' Intention to Use Quick Response (QR) Mobile Payment. Jurnal Pengurusan, 57. doi:https://doi.org/10.17576/pengurusan-2019-57-02
DOI
|
10 |
Jogiyanto, H. M. (2007). Sistem informasi keperilakuan: Yogyakarta: Andi Offset.
|
11 |
Kang, Y., Lee, M., & Lee, S. (2014). Service-oriented factors affecting the adoption of smartphones. Journal of technology management innovation, 9(2), 98-117. doi:https://doi.org/10.4067/s0718-27242014000200008
DOI
|
12 |
Khairi, M. S., & Baridwan, Z. (2015). An Empirical Study on Organizational Acceptance Accounting Information Systems in Sharia Banking. The International Journal of Accounting and Business Society, 23(1), 97-122.
|
13 |
Khoirunnisa. (2019). Top 5 Mobile Payment di Indonesia 2018. Retrieved from https://selular.id/2019/01/top-5-mobilepayment-di-indonesia-2018/
|
14 |
Kurniawati, H. A., Arif, A., & Winarno, W. A. (2017). Analisis minat penggunaan mobile banking dengan pendekatan Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) yang telah dimodifikasi. e-Journal Ekonomi Bisnis dan Akuntansi, 4(1), 24-29. doi:https://doi.org/10.19184/ejeba.v4i1.4563
DOI
|
15 |
Marangunic, N., & Granic, A. (2015). Technology acceptance model: a literature review from 1986 to 2013. Universal Access in the Information Society, 14(1), 81-95. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-014-0348-1
DOI
|
16 |
Mathieson, K. (1991). Predicting user intentions: comparing the technology acceptance model with the theory of planned behavior. Information Systems Research, 2(3), 173-191. doi:https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2.3.173
DOI
|
17 |
Muslimah, D. A., & Aisyah, M. N. (2016). Pengaruh computer self-efficacy, subjective norm, dan system quality terhadap penerimaan womunity oleh nasabah WOM finance. Jurnal Profita: Kajian Ilmu Akuntansi, 4(8).
|
18 |
Schepers, J., & Wetzels, M. (2007). A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model: Investigating subjective norm and moderation effects. Information & Management, 44(1), 90-103. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2006.10.007
DOI
|
19 |
Nguyen Thi, N., & Bui Huy, K. (2020). Behavioral Intention to Accept and Use Banking Service. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 7(11), 393-400. doi:https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2020.vol7.no11.393
DOI
|
20 |
Padilla-MeleNdez, A., Del Aguila-Obra, A. R., & Garrido-Moreno, A. (2013). Perceived playfulness, gender differences and technology acceptance model in a blended learning scenario. Computers & Education, 63(4), 306-317. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.12.014
DOI
|
21 |
Sipior, J. C., Ward, B. T., & Connolly, R. (2011). The digital divide and t-government in the United States: Using the technology acceptance model to understand usage. European Journal of Information Systems, 20(3), 308-328. doi:https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2010.64
DOI
|
22 |
Susilo, A. Z., Prabowo, M. I., Taman, A., Pustikaningsih, A., & Samlawi, A. (2019). A Comparative Study of Factors Affecting User Acceptance of GO-PAY and OVO As a Feature of Fintech Application. Procedia Computer Science, 161, 876-884. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2019.11.195
DOI
|
23 |
Teo, A.-C., Tan, G. W.-H., Ooi, K.-B., & Lin, B. (2015). Why consumers adopt mobile payment? A partial least squares structural equation modelling PLS-SEM approach. International Journal of Mobile Communications, 13(5), 478-497. doi:https://doi.org/10.1504/ijmc.2015.070961
DOI
|
24 |
Van Anh, N., & Thi Phuong Thao, N. (2020). An Integrated Model of CSR Perception and TAM on Intention to Adopt Mobile Banking. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 7(12), 1073-1087. doi: https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2020.vol7.no12.1073
DOI
|
25 |
Yadav, R., & Mahara, T. (2017). An Empirical Study of Consumers Intention to Purchase Wooden Handicraft Items Online: Using Extended Technology Acceptance Model. Global Business Review, 20(2), 1-19. doi:10.1177/0972150917713899
DOI
|
26 |
Venkatesh, V., & Bala, H. (2008). Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. Decision sciences, 39(2), 273-315. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.2008.00192.x
DOI
|
27 |
Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186-204. doi:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926
DOI
|
28 |
Winarno, W. A., & Putra, H. S. (2020). Technology acceptance model of the Indonesian government financial reporting information systems. International Journal of Public Sector Performance Management, 6(1), 68-84. doi:10.1504/IJPSPM.2020.105089
DOI
|
29 |
Ampol, N., Busaya, V., & Tanakorn, L. (2020). Causal Factors Affecting Mobile Banking Services Acceptance by Customers in Thailand. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 7(11), 421-428. doi:https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2020.vol7.no11.421
DOI
|
30 |
Amelia, E. (2019). Analisis Perilaku Minat Menggunakan Mobile Payment Dengan Pendekatan Technology Acceptance Model 3: Studi Pada Pengguna Aplikasi Pembayaran OVO. Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia,
|
31 |
Bogea, F., & Brito, E. P. Z. (2018). Determinants of social media adoption by large companies. Journal of technology management innovation, 13(1), 11-18. doi:https://doi.org/10.4067/s0718-27242018000100011
DOI
|
32 |
Chawla, D., & Joshi, H. (2019). Consumer attitude and intention to adopt mobile wallet in India - An empirical study. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 37(7), 1590-1618. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/IJBM-09-2018-0256
DOI
|
33 |
Chin, W. W., Johnson, N., & Schwarz, A. (2008). A Fast Form Approach to Measuring Technology Acceptance and other Constructs. MIS Quarterly, 32(4), 687-703. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/25148867
DOI
|
34 |
Chuang, L.-M., Liu, C.-C., & Kao, H.-K. (2016). The adoption of fintech service: TAM perspective. International Journal of Management Administrative Sciences, 3(7), 1-15.
|