Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2021.vol8.no1.543

A Computable General Equilibrium-Top Down Behavioral Microsimulation on Assessing the Philippine Tax Reform  

DIZON, Ricardo Laurio (Graduate School, Polytechnic University of the Philippines)
Publication Information
The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business / v.8, no.1, 2021 , pp. 543-550 More about this Journal
Abstract
The purpose of the study is to investigate the simulated effects of the Philippine tax reform, which is called Tax Reform for Acceleration and Inclusion Law, on household income and occupational choice. The study utilized the Family Income Expenditure Survey and tax collection as input to Computable General Equilibrium-Top Down Behavioral Microsimulation approach to determine the effect of Philippine tax reform on household income and occupational choice. The results of the study show that the household income in the Philippines will increase due to the implementation of the Philippine tax reform. Also, the study had found that tax reform results drive the household to shift from being farming entrepreneur to salaried workers since the utility derived from being workers is much higher compared to the utility derived from being entrepreneur. The findings of this research suggest that the Philippine Tax Reform for Acceleration and Inclusion Law is beneficial to the household since their income would increase, which will further result to an increase in their capability to buy goods and services. However, the tax reform would also lead to imbalance between the distribution of numbers of workers across sectors such as entrepreneurial farming, entrepreneurial non-farming, and wage sector.
Keywords
Tax Reform; CGE Modeling; Microsimulation; Labor Tax; Occupational Choice;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Ahmed, S., Ahmed, V., & Abbas, A. (2010). Taxation reforms: a CGE-microsimulation analysis for Pakistan. Poverty and Economic Policy Research Network, 1-50, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1683451.   DOI
2 Amaral, E. F., Queiroz, B. L., Goncalves G. Q., & Faustino S. (2013). Informality, population aging, education attainment, and earnings in Brazil. Researchgate. Retrieved December 28, 2019, from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/318670288_Informality_population_aging_educational_attainment_and_earnings_in_Brazil
3 Becker, G. S. (1994). Human capital: a theoretical and empirical analysis, with special reference to education. education in the twenty-first century. In: Human Capital: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis with Special Reference to Education, 3rd edition, 323-350, New York: Colombia University Press.
4 Bourguignon, F. Ferreira, F. H. & Leite, P. G. (2007). Beyond oaxaca- blinder : accounting for difference in household income distribution. The Journal of Economic Inequality, 6, 117-148.   DOI
5 Bureau of Internal Revenue. (2019). Retrieved December 28, 2019, from: https://www.bir.gov.ph/index.php/tax-information/withholding-tax.html.
6 Dom, R. & Miller, M. (2018). Reforming tax systems in the developing world: what can we learn from the past? Retrieved January 21, 2020, from: https://www.odi.org/publications/11151-reforming-tax-systems-developing-world-what-can-we-learn-past.
7 Gomes, R., Lozachmeur, J. M. & Pavan, A. (2018). Differential taxation and occupational choice. Review of Economic Studies, 85(1), 511-57, https://doi.org/10.1093/restud/rdx022.   DOI
8 Kotlikoff, L. J. & Summers, L. H. (1987). Tax incidence. The Handbook of Public Economics (1043-1092), Cambridge, MA: NBER.
9 Ledic, M. (2012). Estimating labor supply at the extensive margin in the presence of sample selection bias. Retrieved December 19, 2019, from: https://mpra.ub.unimuenchen.de/55745/1/MPRA_paper_55745.pdf.
10 Mankiw, N. G. & Taylor M. P. (2006). Economics (3rd ed.). London, UK: Thomson Learning.
11 Mincer, J. A. (1974). Schooling, experience, and earnings. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
12 Nadoveza, O., Sekur, T., & Beg M. (2016). General equilibrium effects of lower labor tax burden in Croatia. Zagreb International Review of Economics and Business, 19(1), 1-14. httpps://doi.org/10.1515/zireb-2016-0009.   DOI
13 Nguyen, H. H. (2019). Impact of direct tax and indirect tax on economic growth. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 6(4), 129-137. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2019.vol6.no4.129.   DOI
14 Colombo, G. (2010). Linking CGE and microsimulation models: a comparison of different approaches. International Journal of Microsimulation, 3(1), 72-91.   DOI
15 Rum, M. & Kusumawardani, A. (2020). Industrial growth and environmental resource toward the tax potential: a case study in South Sulawesi Province. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 7(10), 201-210. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2020.vol7.no10.201.   DOI
16 Oh, K. & Ki, E. (2020). Effect of tax-related information on pre-tax income forecast and value relevance. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 7(1), 81-90. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2020.vol7.no1.81.   DOI
17 Philippine Statistics Authority. (2019). 2015 Family income and expenditure survey. Retreived January 28, 2020, from: openstat.psa.gov.ph.
18 Polavieja, J. G. (2008). The effect of occupational sex-composition on earnings: job- specialization, sex role attitudes and the division of domestic labor in Spain. European Sociological Review, 24(2), 199-213. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcm043.   DOI
19 Rutkowski, J. (2007). Taxation of labor, fiscal policy and economic growth, lessons for Eastern Europe and Central Asia. Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (pp 281-335), Washington: World Bank.
20 Schultz, T. W. (1961). Investment in human capital. The American Economic Review, 51(1), 1-17.
21 Tuano, P. P., Castillo, C. J., Clarete, R.L., Muyrong, M. S. & Banaag, M. (2018). Assessing the TRAIN's coal and petroleum excise taxes: macroeconomic, environmental and welfare effect. Discussion Paper Series No. 2018, 41. Retrieved December 23, 2019, from: https://ideas.repec.org/p/phd/dpaper/dp_2018-41_(revised).html.
22 United Nation. (2015). Addis ababa action agenda of the third international conference on financing for development assembly. Retrieved July 15, 2020, from: https://unctad.org/meetings/en/SessionalDocuments/ares69d313_en.pdf.
23 Zhang, Y., Wang, X. & Chen, K. (2012). Growth and distributive effects of public infrastructure investment in China. Partnership for Economic Policy Working Paper No. 2012(0), 1-37.