Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2021.vol8.no12.0377

Big Accounting Data and Sustainable Business Growth: Evidence from Listed Firms in Thailand  

PHORNLAPHATRACHAKORN, Kornchai (Faculty of Management Sciences and Information Technology, Nakhon Phanom University)
JANNOPAT, Saithip (Faculty of Management Sciences and Information Technology, Nakhon Phanom University)
Publication Information
The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business / v.8, no.12, 2021 , pp. 377-389 More about this Journal
Abstract
This study aims at investigating the effects of big accounting data on the sustainable business growth of listed firms in Thailand. In addition, it examines the mediating effects of accounting information quality and decision-making effectiveness and the moderating effects of digital innovation on the research relationships. The study's useful samples are the 289 listed Thai companies. To examine the research relationships, the structural equation model and multiple regression analysis are used in this study. According to the results of this study, big accounting data has a significant effect on accounting information quality, decision-making effectiveness, and sustainable business growth. Next, accounting information quality significantly affects decision-making effectiveness and sustainable business growth. Similarly, decision-making effectiveness significantly affects sustainable business growth. Both accounting information quality and decision-making effectiveness mediate the big accounting data-sustainable business growth relationships. Lastly, digital innovation moderates the effects of accounting information quality and decision-making effectiveness on sustainable business growth. Accordingly, In conclusion, big accounting data has emerged as a key source of sustainable competitive advantage. As a result, to succeed in competitive environments, businesses must have a thorough understanding of big accounting data.
Keywords
Big Accounting Data; Accounting Information Quality; Decision Making Effectiveness; Digital Innovation; Sustainable Business Growth;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Ren, S. J., Wamba, S. F., Akter, S., Dubey, R., & Childe, S. J. (2017). Modeling quality dynamics, business value, and firm performance in a big data analytics environment. International Journal of Production Research, 55(17), 5011-5026. https:/doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2016.1154209   DOI
2 Rezaee, Z., & Wang, J. (2019). Relevance of big data to forensic accounting practice and education. Managerial Auditing Journal, 34(3), 268-288. https:/doi.org/10.1108/MAJ-08-2017-1633   DOI
3 Kline, R. B. (1998). Principles and practices of structural equation modeling. New York: The Guilford Press.
4 Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
5 Setiawan, I., Disman, D., Sapriya, S., & Malihah, E. (2021). The impact of self-efficacy on training, leadership attitudes and entrepreneurial performance: An empirical study in Indonesia. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics, and Business, 8(10), 37-45. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2021.vol8.no10.0037   DOI
6 Torre, M. L., Dumay, J., & Rea, M. A. (2018). Breaching intellectual capital: critical reflections on big data security. Meditari Accountancy Research, 26(3), 463-482. https:/doi.org/10.1108/MEDAR-06-2017-0154   DOI
7 Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), 238-246. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238   DOI
8 Kaufmann, L., Carter, C. R., & Buhrmann, C. (2012). The impact of individual debiasing efforts on financial decision effectiveness in the supplier selection process. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 42(5), 411-433. https:/doi.org/10.1108/09600031211246492   DOI
9 Bui, M. L. (2021). A journey of digital transformation of small and medium-sized enterprises in Vietnam: Insights from multiple cases. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics, and Business, 8(10), 77-85. https:/doi.org/10.14126/jafeb.2021.vol8.no10.77   DOI
10 Drum, D., Pernsteiner, A., & Revak, A. (2017). Workarounds in an SAP environment: Impacts on accounting information quality. Journal of Accounting and Organizational Change, 13(1), 44-64. https:/doi.org/10.1108/JAOC-05-2015-0040   DOI
11 Ciriello, R. F., Richter, A., & Schwabe, G. (2018). Digital innovation. Business and Information Systems Engineering, 60(6), 563-569. https:/doi.org/10.1007/s12599-018-0559-8   DOI
12 Bollen, K. A., & Long, J. S. (1993). Testing structural equation models. California: Sage Publications.
13 Byrne, B. M. (1998). Structural equation modeling with LISREL, Prelis, and Simplis: basic concepts, applications, and programming. New Jersey: L. Erlbaum Associates.
14 Cao, G., Duan, Y., & Cadden, T. (2019). The link between information processing capability and competitive advantage is mediated through decision-making effectiveness. International Journal of Information Management, 44, 121-131. https:/doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.10.003   DOI
15 Cohen, S., & Karatzimas, S. (2017). Accounting information quality and decision usefulness of governmental financial reporting: moving from case to modified cash. Meditari Accountancy Review, 25(1), 95-113. https:/doi.org/10.1108/MEDAR-10-2015-0070   DOI
16 Herda, D. N., & Lavelle, J. J. (2012). The auditor-audit -firm relationship and its effect on burnout and turnover intention. Accounting Horizons, 26(4), 707-723. https:/doi.org/10.2308/ACCH-50181   DOI
17 Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis: A global perspective (7th edn.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Person Prentice Hall.
18 Green, S., McKinney, E., Jr., Heppard, K., & Garcia, L. (2018). Big data, digital demand, and decision-making. International Journal of Accounting and Information Management, 26(4), 541-555. https:/doi.org/10.1108/IJAIM-02-2017-0019   DOI
19 Churchill, G. A., (1979). A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs. Journal of Marketing Research, 16(2), 64-73. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3150876   DOI
20 Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. H. (1986). Organizational information requirements, media richness, and structural design. Management Science, 32(5), 554-571. https:/doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.32.5.554   DOI
21 Armstrong, J. S., & Overton, T. S. (1977). Estimating non-response bias in mail surveys. Journal of Marketing Research, 14(3), 396-402. https:/doi.org/10.2307/3150783   DOI
22 Arnaboldi, M., Busco, C., & Cuganesan, S. (2017). Accounting, accountability, social media, and big data: revolution or hype? Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 30(4), 762-776. https:/doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-03-2017-2880   DOI
23 Khin, S., & Ho, T. C. F. (2019). Digital technology, digital capability and organizational performance: A mediating role of digital innovation. International Journal of Innovation Science, 11(2), 177-195. https:/doi.org/10.1108/ijis-08-2018-0083   DOI
24 Schwab, L., Gold, S., Kunz, N., & Reiner, G. (2017). Sustainable business growth: Exploring operations decision-making. Journal of Global Responsibility, 8(1), 83-95. https:/doi.org/10.1108/ASR-09-2017-0006   DOI
25 Vitale, G., Cupertino, S., & Riccaboni, A. (2020). Big data and management control systems change the case of an agricultural SME. Journal of Management Control, 31, 123-152. https:/doi.org/10.1007%2Fs00187-020-00298-w   DOI
26 Aaker, D. A., Kumar, V., & Day, G. S. (2001). Marketing research. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
27 Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182. https:/doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.51.6.1173   DOI
28 Huesig, S., & Endres, H. (2019). Exploring the digital innovation process: The role of functionality for the adoption of innovation management software by innovation managers. European Journal of Innovation Management, 22(2), 302-314. https:/doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-02-2018-0051   DOI
29 Islam, A., & Wahab, S. A. (2021). The intervention of strategic innovation practices in between regulations and sustainable business growth: a holistic perspective for Malaysian SMEs. World Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management, and Sustainable Development, 17(3), 396-421. https:/doi.org/10.1108/WJEMSD-04-2020-0035   DOI
30 Hutajulu, R. S., Susita, D., & Eliyana, A. (2021). The effect of digitalization and virtual leadership on organizational innovation during the COVID-19 pandemic crisis: A case study in Indonesia. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics, and Business, 8(10), 57-64. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2021.vol8.no10.0057   DOI
31 Perdana, A., Robb, A., & Rohde, F. (2019). Textual and contextual analysis of professionals' discourses on XBRL data and information quality. International Journal of Accounting and Information Management, 27(3), 492-511. https:/doi.org/10.1108/IJAIM-01-2018-0003   DOI