1 |
Abrahams, D. A. (2010). Technology adoption in higher education: A framework for identifying and prioritizing issues and barriers to adoption of instructional technology. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 5(1), 63-79. https://doi.org/:10.1108/17581184201000012.
DOI
|
2 |
Aldemir, C., & Gulcan, Y. (2004). Student satisfaction in higher education: A Turkish case. Higher Education Management and Policy, 16(2), 109-122. https://doi.org/10.1787/hemp-v16-art19-en
DOI
|
3 |
Aldunate, R., & Nussbaum, M. (2013). Teacher adoption of technology. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(3), 519-524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.10.017
DOI
|
4 |
Benjamin, S. D. (2014). Technology education and training: The need for a comprehensive plan. Compendium of Continuing Education in Dentistry, 35(10), 730-731.https://doi.org/10445/11.10001548.3210
|
5 |
Chen, P. Y., & Cuong, B. M. (2020). An evaluation of student satisfaction of the joint master programs at Foreign Trade University in Vietnam. Journal of International Economics and Management), 20(02), 75-88. http://tracuutapchi.ftu.edu.vn/index.php/tcqlktqt/article/view/867
|
6 |
De Nooijer, J., Schneider, F., & Verstegen, D. M. (2021). Optimizing collaborative learning in online courses. The Clinical Teacher, 18(1), 19-23. https://doi.org/10.1111/tct.13243
DOI
|
7 |
Chen, P. Y., Pham, L., Cousins, B., & Bui, C. (2017). Student satisfaction and its antecedents: How does the student satisfaction index model matter in the context of joint master's degree programs in Vietnam. International Journal of Business & Applied Sciences, 6(2), 6. https://ijbas.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/Paper-1_Chen-et-al..pdf
DOI
|
8 |
Guolla, M. (1999). Assessing the teaching quality to student satisfaction relationship: Applied customer satisfaction research in the classroom. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 7(3), 87-97. https://doi.org/10.1080/10696679.1999.11501843
DOI
|
9 |
Lai, C. S., & Van Nguyen, Q. (2017). Factors to student satisfaction towards the educational activities: A Case Study In Vietnam. International Journal of Organizational Innovation, 10(1), 56-79. https://doi.org/10.12134//12.ijoi.12.5679
DOI
|
10 |
Ha, N. M., & Tam, H. L. (2015). Attitudes and purchase intention towards counterfeiting luxurious fashion products in Vietnam. International Journal of Economics and Finance, 7(11), 207-221. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijef.v7n11p207
DOI
|
11 |
Chen, Y., Lou, H., & Luo, W. (2002). Distance learning technology adoption: A motivation perspective. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 42(2), 38-43. https://doi.org/10.1080/08874417.2002.11647485
DOI
|
12 |
Doan, T. T. T. (2021). The effect of service quality on student loyalty and student satisfaction: An empirical study of universities in Vietnam. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics, and Business, 8(8), 251-258. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2021.vol8.no8.0251
DOI
|
13 |
Fatani, T. H. (2020). Student satisfaction with videoconferencing teaching quality during the COVID-19 pandemic. BMC Medical Education, 20(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02310-2
DOI
|
14 |
Buchanan, T., Sainter, P., & Saunders, G. (2013). Factors affecting faculty use of learning technologies: Implications for models of technology adoption. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 25(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2021.vol8.no10.0187
DOI
|
15 |
Kieng, R., Phothikitti, K., & Vongurai, R. (2021). Critical factors affecting student satisfaction and loyalty: An empirical study in Cambodia. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics, and Business, 8(7), 225-234. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2021.vol8.no7.0225
DOI
|
16 |
Barbalet, J. (2012). Self-interest and the theory of action. The British Journal of Sociology, 63(3), 412-429. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-4446.2012.01417.x
DOI
|
17 |
Beecham, R. (2009). Teaching quality and student satisfaction: Nexus or simulacrum? London Review of Education, 7(2), 135-146. https://doi.org/10.1080/14748460902990336
DOI
|
18 |
Barber, G. D., Givens, D. I., Kridis, M. S., Offer, N. W., & Murray, I. (1990). Prediction of the organic matter digestibility of grass silage. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 28(1), 115-128. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-8401(90)90074-I
DOI
|
19 |
Mulyono, H. (2020). Antecedents of student loyalty within universities in North Sumatra Province, Indonesia. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics, and Business, 7(12), 491-500. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2020.vol7.no12.491
DOI
|
20 |
Pham, L., Limbu, Y. B., Bui, T. K., Nguyen, H. T., & Pham, H. T. (2019). Do e-learning service quality influence e-learning student satisfaction and loyalty? Evidence from Vietnam. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0136-3
DOI
|
21 |
Bergman, P. (2016). Technology adoption in education: Usage, spillovers, and student achievement. New York: McGraw Hill
|
22 |
Blood-Siegfried, J. E., Short, N. M., Rapp, C. G., Hill, E., Talbert, S., Skinner, J., Campbell, A., & Goodwin, L. (2008). A rubric for improving the quality of online courses. International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship, 5, 34. https://doi.org/10.2202/1548-923X.1648
DOI
|
23 |
Bui, T. Q., Nguyen, N.-T., Nguyen, K. K., & Tran, T.-T. (2021). Antecedents affecting purchase intention of green skincare products: A case study in Vietnam. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics, and Business, 8(3), 1295-1302.
DOI
|
24 |
Chen, L. (2013). A study of green purchase intention comparing with collectivistic (Chinese) and individualistic (American) consumers in Shanghai, China. Information Management and Business Review, 5(7), 342-346. https://doi.org/10.1108/JM2-01-2014-0010
DOI
|
25 |
Annamdevula, S., & Bellamkonda, R. S. (2016). Effect of student perceived service quality on student satisfaction, loyalty and motivation in Indian universities: Development of HiEduQual. Journal of Modelling in Management, 11(2), 488-517. https://doi.org/10.1108/JM2-01-2014-0010.
DOI
|
26 |
Alves, H., & Raposo, M. (2007). Conceptual model of student satisfaction in higher education. Total Quality Management, 18(5), 571-588. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783360601074315
DOI
|