1 |
An, H.J., Shin, S.H., & Lim, K.O. (2009). The effects of different instructor facilitation approaches on students' interactions during asynchronous online discussions. Computers & Education, 53(3), 749-760
DOI
|
2 |
Becuwe, H., Tondeur, J., Roblin, N.P., Thys, J., & Castelein, E. (2016). Teacher design teams as a strategy for professional development: the role of the facilitator. Educational Research and Evaluation, 22(3-4), 141-154. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13803611.2016.1247724
DOI
|
3 |
Liu, C.C., & Tsai, C.C. (2008). An analysis of peer interaction patterns as discoursed by online small group problem-solving activity. Computers & Education, 50(3), 627-639
DOI
|
4 |
Masters, K., & Oberprieler, G. (2004). Encouraging equitable online participation through curriculum articulation. Computers & Education, 42(4), 319-332.
DOI
|
5 |
Mazzolini, M., & Maddison, S. (2003). Sage, guide or ghost? The effect of instructor intervention on student participation in online discussion forums. Computers & Education, 40(3), 237-253.
DOI
|
6 |
Morris, K.V., Finnegan, C., & Sz-Shyan, W. (2005). Tracking student behavior, persistence, and achievement in online courses. Internet and Higher Education, 8(3), 221-231.
DOI
|
7 |
Muilenburg, L.Y., & Berge, Z.L. (2005). Student barriers to online learning: A factor analytic study. Distance Learning, 26(1), 29-48.
|
8 |
Pena-Shaff, J.B., & Nicholls, C. (2004). Analyzing student interactions and meaning construction in computer bulletin board discussions. Computers & Education, 42(3), 243-265
DOI
|
9 |
Murphy, K.L., Mahoney, S.E., Chen, C., Mendoza‐Diaz, N.V., & Yang, X. (2005). A Constructivist Model of Mentoring, Coaching, and Facilitating Online Discussions. Distance Education, 26(3), 341-366. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01587910500291454
DOI
|
10 |
Offir, B., Lev, Y., & Bezalel, R. (2008). Surface and deep learning processes in distance education: Synchronous versus asynchronous systems. Computers & Education, 51(3), 1172-1183
DOI
|
11 |
Prinsen, F., Volman, M.L.L., & Terwel, J. (2007). The influence of learner characteristics on degree and type of participation in a CSCL environment. British Journal of Educational Technology, 38(6), 1037-1055.
DOI
|
12 |
Cheng, C. K., Pare, D.E., Collimore, L.-M., & Joordens, S. (2011). Assessing the effectiveness of a voluntary online discussion forum on improving students' course performance. Computers & Education, 56(1), 253-261.
DOI
|
13 |
Bonk, C., Wisher, R. A., & Lee, J. Y. (2004). Moderating learner-centered e-learning: Problems and solutions, benefits and implications. In T. S. Roberts (Ed.), Online collaborative learning: Theory and practice (pp. 54-85). Hershey, PA: Information Science Publishing.
|
14 |
Braude, E., & Arakelian, A. (2007). Facilitating security education in an online environment. Journal of Security Education, 2(3), 33-40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/J460v02n03_03
DOI
|
15 |
Caspi, A., Chajuta, E., & Saportaa, K. (2008). Participation in class and in online discussions: Gender differences. Computers & Education, 50(3), 718-724.
DOI
|
16 |
Chiu, Y.-C. J. (2009). Facilitating Asian students' critical thinking in online discussions. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(1), 42-57.
DOI
|
17 |
Davies, J., & Graff, M. (2005). Performance in e-learning: Online participation and student grades. British Journal of Educational Technology, 36(4), 657-663.
DOI
|
18 |
Dennen, V.P. (2005). From message posting to learning dialogues: Factors affecting learner participation in asynchronous discussion. Distance Education, 26(1), 127-148.
DOI
|
19 |
Bento, R., & Schuster, C. (2003). Participation: The online challenge. In: A. Aggarwal (ed.), Web-based education: Learning from experience (pp. 156-164). Hershey, PA: Idea Group Publishing.
|
20 |
Donnelly, R. (2010). Harmonizing technology with interaction in blended problem-based learning. Computers & Education, 54(2), 350-359
DOI
|
21 |
Taradi, S. K., & Taradi, M. (2004). Expanding the traditional physiology class with asynchronous online discussions and collaborative projects. Advances in Physiology Education, 28(2), 73-78.
DOI
|
22 |
Puntambekar, S. (2006). Analyzing collaborative interactions: divergence, shared understanding and construction of knowledge. Computers & Education, 47(3), 332-351
DOI
|
23 |
Quinney, L., & Fowler, P. (2013). Facilitating shared online group learning between careers, service users and social work students. Social Work Education, 32(8), 1021-1031. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02615479.2012.734801
DOI
|
24 |
Rau, P. L. P., Gao, Q., & Wu, L. M. (2008). Using mobile communication technology in high school education: motivation, pressure, and learning performance. Computers & Education, 50(1), 1-22.
DOI
|
25 |
Rovai, A.P. (2003). Strategies for grading online discussions: Effects of discussions and classroom community in Internet-based university courses. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 15(1), 89-107.
DOI
|
26 |
Rovai, A.P. (2007). Facilitating online discussions effectively. Internet and Higher Education, 10(1), 77-88.
DOI
|
27 |
Thornton, K., & Yoong, P. (2011). The role of the blended action learning facilitator: an enabler of learning and a trusted inquisitor. Action Learning: Research and Practice, 8(2), 129-146.
DOI
|
28 |
Vonderwell, S., & Zachariah, S. (2005). Factors that influence participation in online learning. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 38(2), 213-230.
DOI
|
29 |
Wang, Q. (2008). Student-facilitators' roles in moderating online discussions. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(5), 859-874.
DOI
|
30 |
Ertl, B., Fischer, F., & Mandl, H. (2006). Conceptual and socio-cognitive support for collaborative learning in videoconferencing environments. Computers & Education, 47, 298-315.
DOI
|
31 |
Evans, S., Knight, T., Sønderlund, A., & Tooley, G. (2014). Facilitators' experience of delivering asynchronous and synchronous online interprofessional education. Medical Teacher, 36(12), 1051-1056. http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2014.918254
DOI
|
32 |
Feger, S. & Zibit, M. (2005). The role of facilitation in online professional development: Engendering co-construction of knowledge. Providence, RI: The Education Alliance at Brown University.
|
33 |
Garrison, D.R., & Cleveland-Innes, M. (2005). Facilitation cognitive presence in online learning: Interaction is not enough. The American Journal of Distance Education, 19(3), 133-148.
DOI
|
34 |
Gilbert, P. K. & Dabbagh, N. (2005). How to structure online discussions for meaningful discourse: a case study. British Journal of Educational Technology, 36(1), 5-18.
DOI
|
35 |
Hendrix, N., & Degner, K. (2016). Supporting online AP students: The rural facilitator and considerations for training. American Journal of Distance Education, 30(3), 133-144. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2016.1198194
DOI
|
36 |
Hew, K. F. & Cheung, W. S. (2007). Attracting student participation in asynchronous online discussions: A case study of peer facilitation. Computers & Education, 51, 1111-1124.
DOI
|
37 |
Zhang, T., Gao, T., Ring, G., & Zhang, W. (2007). Using online discussion forums to assist a traditional English class. International Journal of E-Learning, 6(4), 623-643.
|
38 |
Yang, Y.T.C., Newby, T., & Bill, R. (2008). Facilitating interactions through structured web-based bulletin boards: A quasi-experimental study on promoting learners' critical thinking skills. Computers & Education, 50(4), 1572-1585.
DOI
|
39 |
Hew, K. F. & Cheung, W.S. (2010). Possible factors influencing Asian students' degree of participation in peer-facilitated online discussion forums: a case study. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 30(1), 85-104.
DOI
|
40 |
Hew, K. F. & Cheung, W.S. (2011). Student facilitators' habits of mind and their influences on higher-level knowledge construction occurrences in online discussions: a case study. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 48(3), 275-285.
DOI
|
41 |
Williams, S.W., Watkins, K., Daley, B., Courtenay, B., Davis, M., & Dymock, D. (2001). Facilitating cross-cultural online discussion groups: Implications for practice. Distance Education, 22(1), 151-167. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0158791010220110
DOI
|
42 |
Janssen, J., Erkensa, G., Kanselaara, G., & Jaspersa, J. (2007). Visualization of participation: Does it contribute to successful computer-supported collaborative learning? Computers & Education, 49(4), 1037-1065.
DOI
|
43 |
Hrastinski, S. (2008). What is online learner participation? A literature review. Computers & Education, 51(4), 1755-1765.
DOI
|
44 |
Hrastinski, S. (2009). A theory of online learning as online participation. Computers & Education, 52(1), 78-82.
DOI
|
45 |
Hylton, M.E. (2007). Facilitating online learning communities: a comparison of two discussion facilitation techniques. Journal of Technology in Human Services, 25(4), 63-78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/J017v25n04_04
DOI
|
46 |
Khine, M., Yeap, L., & Lok, A. (2003). The quality of message ideas. Thinking and interaction in an asynchronous CMC environment. Educational Media International, 40(1-2), 115-125.
DOI
|
47 |
Kozar, O., & Lum, J.F. (2015). Online doctoral writing groups: do facilitators or communication modes make a difference?. Quality in Higher Education, 21(1), 38-51. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13538322.2015.1032003
DOI
|
48 |
Lipponen, L., Rahikainen, M., Lallimo, J., & Hakkarainen, K. (2003). Patterns of participation and discourse in elementary students' computer-supported collaborative learning. Learning and Instruction, 13(5), 487-509.
DOI
|
49 |
La Pointe, K.D., & Gunawarndena, C. (2004). Developing testing and refining of a model to understand the relationship between peer interaction and learning outcomes in computer-mediated conferencing. Distance Education, 25(1), 93-106.
|
50 |
Lavooy, M.J., & Newlin, M.H. (2003). Computer mediated communication: Online instruction and interactivity. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 14(2), 157-165.
|