Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2020.vol7.no8.289

Effectiveness Score of the Board of Directors and Modified Audit Opinion: Empirical Evidence from Malaysian Publicly-Listed Companies  

OMER, Waddah Kamal Hassan (Department of Accounting, College of Business Administration, Northern Border University)
ALJAAIDI, Khaled Salmen (Accounting Department, College of Business Administration, Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University)
YUSOF, Mohd Atef Md. (School of Accounting, College of Business, Universiti Utara Malaysia)
Publication Information
The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business / v.7, no.8, 2020 , pp. 289-296 More about this Journal
Abstract
The study investigates the association between the effectiveness of the board of directors and the likelihood that a company receives a modified audit opinion (as a measure of the quality of companies' external financial reporting) in Malaysia. The sample companies were extracted from the population of publicly-available information mainly the annual reports of publicly-listed companies on the Bursa Malaysia. 136 firm-year observations listed on Bursa Malaysia were identified to examine the relationship between the effectiveness of the board of directors and a modified audit opinion. Data used in this study are collected from two separate sources - annual reports and Datastream. Any missing financial figure from Datastream was acquired from the annual reports. To test the study's hypotheses, we use the pooled cross-sectional logistic regression analysis for 136 firm-year observations listed on Bursa Malaysia over the period 2009-2011. The evidence we have uncovered is consistent with the hypothesis that companies with large score of the board of directors' effectiveness are less possible to receive a modified audit opinion. Therefore, the result confirms that the combined effect of the board of directors' characteristics has a significant negative association with the likelihood of the companies receiving a modified audit opinion.
Keywords
Modified Audit Opinion; Financial Reporting Quality; Board of Directors; Effectiveness Score; Malaysia;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Ward, A. J., Brown, J. A., & Rodriguez, D. (2009). Governance Bundles, Firm Performance, and the Substitutability and Complementarity of Governance Mechanisms. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 17(5), 646-660. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8683.2009.00766.x   DOI
2 Watts, R. L., & Zimmerman, J. L. (1986). Positive Accounting Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
3 Agrawal, A., & Chadha, S. (2005). Corporate governance and accounting scandals. Journal of Law and Economics, 48(2), 371-406. https://doi.org/10.1086/430808   DOI
4 Agrawal, A., & Knoeber, C.R. (1996). Firm performance and mechanisms to control agency problems between managers and shareholders. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 31(3), 377-397. https://doi.org/10.2307/2331397   DOI
5 Alkilani, S. Z., Hussin, W. N. W., & Salim, B. (2019a). The Influence of Audit Committee Characteristics on Modified Audit Opinion in Jordan". Journal of Finance and Accounting. 7(3), 95-106. DOI: 10.11548/jfja20190703.14   DOI
6 Cai, J., Liu, Y., & Qian, Y., (2009). Information asymmetry and corporate governance. Working Paper, Temple University.
7 Davis, G. F., & Useem, M. (2002). Top management, company directors, and corporate control. Handbook of Strategy and Management, 233-259.
8 Charitou, A., Louca, C., & Vafeas, N. (2007). Boards, ownership structure and involuntary delisting from the New York Stock Exchange. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 26(2), 249-262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2007.02.006   DOI
9 Che Haat, M. H., Abdul Rahman, R., & Mahenthiran, S. (2008). Corporate governance, transparency and performance of Malaysian companies. Managerial Auditing Journal, 23(8), 744-778. https://doi.org/10.1108/02686900810899518   DOI
10 Cohen, J. R., Krishnamoorthy, G., & Wright, A. M. (2008). Form versus Substance: The Implications for Auditing Practice and Research of Alternative Perspectives on Corporate Governance. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 27(2), 181-198. https://doi.org/10.2308/aud.2008.27.2.181   DOI
11 Darus, F., & Mohamad, A. (2011). Corporate Governance and Corporate Failure in the Context of Agency Theory. The Journal of American Academy of Business, Cambridge, 17(1), 125-132.
12 DeFond, M. L., Hann, R. N., & Hu, X. (2005). Does the market value financial expertise on audit committees of boards of directors? Journal of Accounting Research, 43(2), 153-193. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-679x.2005.00166.x   DOI
13 Deng, X., & Wang, Z. (2006). Ownership structure and financial distress: Evidence from public listed company in China. International Journal of Management, 23(3), 486-503.
14 Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. J. (2006). Multivariate data analysis (6th Ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ : Pearson International Edition.
15 Farinha, J., & Viana, L. F. (2009). Board Structure and Modified Audit Opinions: Evidence from the Portuguese Stock Exchange. International Journal of Auditing, 13(3), 237-258. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1099-1123.2009.00394.x   DOI
16 Farrugia, K. J., & Baldacchino, P. J. (2005). Qualified audit opinions in Malta. Managerial Auditing Journal, 20(8), 823-843. DOI: 10.1108/02686900510619674   DOI
17 Firth, M., Fung, P. M. Y., & Rui, O. M. (2007). Ownership, two-tier board structure, and the informativeness of earnings: Evidence from China. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 26(4), 463-496. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2007.05.004   DOI
18 Garcia Lara, J. M., Garcia Osma B., & Penalva, F. (2009). Accounting Conservatism and Corporate Governance. Review of Accounting Studies, 14(1), 161-201.doi.org/10.1007/s11142-007-9060-1   DOI
19 Goh, B. W. (2009). Audit Committees, Boards of Directors, and Remediation of Material Weaknesses in Internal Control. Contemporary Accounting Research 26(2), 549-579. DOI: 10.1506/car.26.2.9   DOI
20 Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1995). Multivariate data analysis (4th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
21 Pucheta-Martinez, M. C., & de Fuentes, C. (2007). The Impact of Audit Committee Characteristics on the Enhancement of the Quality of Financial Reporting: an empirical study in the Spanish context. An International Review, Corporate Governance Journal, 15(6), 1394-1412. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8683.2007.00653.x   DOI
22 Lorca, C., Sanchez-Ballesta, J. P., & Garcia-Meca, E. (2011). Board Effectiveness and Cost of Debt. Journal of Business Ethics, 100(4), 613-631. DOI: 10.1007/s10551-010-0699-3   DOI
23 Hope, O.-K.., & Langli, J. C. (2010). Auditor Independence in a Private Firm and Low Litigation Risk Setting. The Accounting Review, 85(2), 573-605. DOI: 10.2308/accr.2010.85.2.573   DOI
24 Johari, N. H., Mohd Saleh, N., Jaffar, R., & Hassan, M. S. (2008). The Influence of Board Independence, Competency and Ownership on Earnings Management in Malaysia. Journal of Economics and Management, 2(2), 281-306.
25 Johl, S., Jubb, C. A., & Houghton, K. A. (2007). Earnings management and the audit opinion: evidence from Malaysia. Managerial Auditing Journal, 22(7), 688-715. doi.org/10.1108/02686900710772591   DOI
26 Lin, J. W., & Hwang, M. I. (2010). Audit Quality, Corporate Governance, and Earnings Management: A Meta-Analysis. International Journal of Auditing, 14(1), 57-77. DOI: 10.1111/j.1099-1123.2009.00403.x   DOI
27 O'Sullivan, M., Percy, M., & Stewart, J. (2008). Australian evidence on corporate governance attributes and their association with forward-looking information in the annual report. Journal of Management and Governance, 12(1), 5-35. DOI: 10.1007/s10997-007-9039-0   DOI
28 Porter, B., Simon, J., & Hatherly, D. (2003). Principles of External Auditing (2nd ed.). England: John Wiley & Sons.
29 Rahmat. M. M., Iskandar, T. M., & Saleh, N. M. (2009). Audit committee characteristics in financially distressed and non-distressed companies. Managerial Auditing Journal, 24(7), 624-638. DOI: 10.1108/02686900910975350   DOI
30 Rusmin, R., Tower, G., Brown, A., & der Zahn, M. V. (2009). Audit Quality, Monitoring Mechanisms and Auditor Reporting Behavior. Working paper.
31 Sanchez-Ballesta, J. P., & Garcia-Meca, E. (2005). Audit qualifications and corporate governance in Spanish listed firms. Managerial Auditing Journal, 20(7), 725-738. DOI: 10.1108/02686900510611258   DOI
32 Sultanoglu, B., Mugan, C. S., Sekerdag, U., & Oran, A. (2018). The auditor's opinion modifications around domestic and global financial crises. Meditari Accountancy Research, 26(4), 622-639. DOI: 10.1108/MEDAR-08-2017-0199   DOI
33 Vafeas, N., & Theodorou, E. (1998). The relationship between board structure and firm performance in the U.K. British Accounting Review, 30(4), 383-407. DOI: U10.1006/bare.1998.0075   DOI