Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2020.vol7.no7.085

The Importance of a Borrower's Track Record on Repayment Performance: Evidence in P2P Lending Market  

KIM, Dongwoo (KB Financial Group)
Publication Information
The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business / v.7, no.7, 2020 , pp. 85-93 More about this Journal
Abstract
In peer-to-peer (P2P) loan markets, as most lenders are unskilled and inexperienced ordinary individuals, it is important to know the characteristics of borrowers that significantly impact their repayment performance. This study investigates the effects and importance of borrowers' past repayment performance track record within the platform to identify its predictive power. To this end, I analyze the detailed loan repayment data from two leading P2P lending platforms in Korea using a Cox proportional hazard, multiple linear regression, and logit models. Furthermore, the predictive power of the factors proxied by borrowers' track records are evaluated through the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. As a result, it is found that the borrowers' past track record within the platform have the most important impact on the repayment performance of their current loans. In addition, this study also reveals that the borrowers' track record is much more predictive of their repayment performance than any other factor. The findings of this study emphasize that individual lenders must take into account the quality of borrowers' past transaction history when making a funding decision, and that platform operators should actively share the borrowers' past records within the markets with lenders.
Keywords
P2P Lending; South Korea; Track Records; Default Prediction;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 2  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Li, Z., Li, K., Yao, X., & Wen, Q. (2019). Predicting prepayment and default risks of unsecured consumer loans in online lending. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 55(1), 118-132.   DOI
2 Lin, M., Prabhala, N. R., & Viswanathan, S. (2013). Judging borrowers by the company they keep: Friendship networks and information asymmetry in online peer-to-peer lending. Management Science, 59(1), 17-35.   DOI
3 Park, H., & Yoo, Y. (2019). Differences among credit rating agencies and the information envirionment. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 6(2), 25-32.   DOI
4 Pope, D. G., & Sydnor, J. R. (2011). What's in a picture? Evidence of discrimination from Prosper.com. Journal of Human Resources, 46(1), 53-92.
5 Tao, Q., Dong, Y., & Lin, Z. (2017). Who can get money? Evidence from the Chinese peer-to-peer lending platform. Information Systems Frontiers, 19(3), 425-441.   DOI
6 Wang, C., Zhang, W., Zhao, X., & Wang, J. (2019). Soft information in online peer-to-peer lending: Evidence from a leading platform in China. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 36, 100873.   DOI
7 Xu, J. J., & Chau, M. (2018). Cheap talk? The impact of lenderborrower communication on peer-to-peer lending outcomes. Journal of Management Information Systems, 35(1), 53-85.   DOI
8 Cox, D. R. (1972). Regression models and life-tables. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), 34(2), 187-202.   DOI
9 Chen, D., Li, X., & Lai, F. (2017). Gender discrimination in online peer-to-peer credit lending: Evidence from a lending platform in China. Electronic Commerce Research, 17, 553-583.   DOI
10 Chen, X., Huang, B., & Ye, D. (2020). Gender gap in peer-to-peer lending: Evidence from China. Journal of Banking & Finance, 112, 105633.   DOI
11 Ding, J., Huang, J., & Meng, M. (2019). Is there an effective reputation mechanism in peer-to-peer lending? Evidence from China. Finance Research Letters, 30, 208-215.   DOI
12 Duarte, J., Siegel, S., & Young, L. (2012). Trust and credit: The role of appearance in peer-to-peer lending. The Review of Financial Studies, 25(8), 2455-2484.   DOI
13 Everett, C. (2015). Group membership, relationship banking and loan default risk: The case of online social lending. Banking and Finance Review, 7(2), 15-54.
14 Freedman, S., & Jin, G. Z. (2017). The information value of online social networks: Lessons from peer-to-peer lending. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 51, 185-222.   DOI
15 Li, J., & Hu, J. (2019). Does university reputation matter? Evidence from peer-to-peer lending. Finance Research Letters, 31, 66-77.   DOI
16 Han, S.-H., Kang, K., & Shin, y. S. (2016). Bond rating, Corporate governance, and cost of debt: The case of Korea. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 5(15), 5-15.
17 Kim, D. (2020). The importance of detailed patterns of herding behaviour in a P2P lending market. Applied Economics Letters, 27(2), 127-130.   DOI