Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2020.vol7.no2.221

Utilizing Case-based Reasoning for Consumer Choice Prediction based on the Similarity of Compared Alternative Sets  

SEO, Sang Yun (Department of Business Administration, Kyungnam University)
KIM, Sang Duck (Department of Business Administration, Kyungnam University)
JO, Seong Chan (School of Management, Kyunghee University)
Publication Information
The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business / v.7, no.2, 2020 , pp. 221-228 More about this Journal
Abstract
This study suggests an alternative to the conventional collaborative filtering method for predicting consumer choice, using case-based reasoning. The algorithm of case-based reasoning determines the similarity between the alternative sets that each subject chooses. Case-based reasoning uses the inverse of the normalized Euclidian distance as a similarity measurement. This normalized distance is calculated by the ratio of difference between each attribute level relative to the maximum range between the lowest and highest level. The alternative case-based reasoning based on similarity predicts a target subject's choice by applying the utility values of the subjects most similar to the target subject to calculate the utility of the profiles that the target subject chooses. This approach assumes that subjects who deliberate in a similar alternative set may have similar preferences for each attribute level in decision making. The result shows the similarity between comparable alternatives the consumers consider buying is a significant factor to predict the consumer choice. Also the interaction effect has a positive influence on the predictive accuracy. This implies the consumers who looked into the same alternatives can probably pick up the same product at the end. The suggested alternative requires fewer predictors than conjoint analysis for predicting customer choices.
Keywords
Similarity of choice alternative set; Case-based reasoning; Choice prediction; Product recommendation; Conjoint analysis;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 4  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Aamodt, A., & Plaza, E. (1994). Case-based reasoning: Foundational issues, methodological variations, and system approaches. AI Communications, 7(1), 39-59.   DOI
2 Andrews, R. L., & Currim, I. S. (2002). Identifying segments with identical choice behaviors across product categories: An intercategory logit mixture model. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 19(1), 65-79.   DOI
3 Bousbahi, F., & Chorfi, H. (2015). MOOC-rec: A case based recommender system for MOOCs. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 195, 1813-1822.   DOI
4 Cheng, Z. F., & Kim, G. B. (2019). The Relationships among Brand Experience, Customer Perceived Value, and Brand Support Behavior in Service Industry. Journal of Distribution Science, 17(2), 91-100.   DOI
5 Chiu, C. (2002). A case-based customer classification approach for direct marketing. Expert Systems with Applications, 22(2), 163-168.   DOI
6 Chiu, C., Chang, P., & Chiu, N. (2003). A case-based expert support system for due-date assignment in a wafer fabrication factory. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 14(3-4), 287-296.   DOI
7 Chung, J. B. (2017). Internet shopping optimization problem with delivery constraints. Journal of Distribution Science, 15(2), 15-20.   DOI
8 DeSarbo, W. S., Ramaswamy, V., & Cohen, S. H. (1995). Market segmentation with choice-based conjoint analysis. Marketing Letters, 6(2), 137-147.   DOI
9 Engel, J. F., Blackwell, R. D., & Miniard, P. W. (1995). Consumer behavior. Orlando, FL: Dryden Press.
10 Finnie, G. & Sun, Z. (2002). Similarity and metrics in casebased reasoning. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 17(3), 273-287.   DOI
11 Lekakos, G., & Giaglis, G. M. (2006). Improving the prediction accuracy of recommendation algorithms: Approaches anchored on human factors. Interacting with Computers, 18(3), 410-431.   DOI
12 Han, J. W., & Kim, W. Ki. (2015). The effect of product type and channel prioritization on effective digital marketing performance. Journal of Distribution Science, 13(5), 91-102.   DOI
13 Huang, M. (2000). Information load: Its relationship to online exploratory and shopping behavior. International Journal of Information Management, 20(5), 337-347.   DOI
14 Hwang, M. I., & Lin, J. W. (1999). Information dimension, information overload and decision quality. Journal of Information Science, 25(3), 213-218.   DOI
15 Jacoby, J., Speller, D. E., & Berning, C. K. (1974). Brand choice behavior as a function of information load: Replication and extension. Journal of Consumer Research, 1(1), 33-42.   DOI
16 Kamakura, W. A., & Russell, G. J. (1989). A probabilistic choice model for market segmentation and elasticity structure. Journal of Marketing Research, 26(4), 379-390.   DOI
17 Malhotra, N. K. (1982). Multi-stage information processing behavior: An experimental investigation. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 10(1), 54-71.   DOI
18 Malhotra, N. K., Jain, A. K., & Lagakos, S. W. (1982). The information overload controversy: An alternative viewpoint. The Journal of Marketing, 46(2), 27-37.   DOI
19 Park, C., & Han, I. (2002). A case-based reasoning with the feature weights derived by analytic hierarchy process for bankruptcy prediction. Expert Systems with Applications, 23(3), 255-264.   DOI
20 Resnick, P., Iacovou, N., Suchak, M., Bergstrom, P., & Riedl, J. (1994). GroupLens: An open architecture for collaborative filtering of netnews. Paper presented at the 1994 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (pp.175-186). New York, NY: ACM.
21 Xiong, N., & Funk, P. (2006). Building similarity metrics reflecting utility in case-based reasoning. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 17(4), 407-416.
22 Shin, K., & Han, I. (1999). Case-based reasoning supported by genetic algorithms for corporate bond rating. Expert Systems with Applications, 16(2), 85-95.   DOI
23 Wedel, M., & Kamakura, W. A. (2000). Market segmentation: Conceptual and methodological foundations. Boston, MA: Kulwer Academic Publisher.