Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2020.vol7.no11.357

The S-Shaped Relationship Between Internationalization and Performance: Empirical Evidence from Laos  

PHAN, Tu Anh (Department of International Business, College of Economics, Can Tho University)
NGUYEN, Thuy Thi Kim (Bien Dong Seafood Ltd.)
PHAN, Triet Minh (Faculty of Arts, University of Waterloo)
Publication Information
The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business / v.7, no.11, 2020 , pp. 357-366 More about this Journal
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to investigate the impact of internationalization on the business performance of firms in Laos as a transition economy. Using a panel dataset collected by the World Bank for 285 firms during the period 2009, 2012, and 2016 in the service and manufacturing industries, the two-steps Heckman regression results found robust evidence for the fact that the S-curve tie exists between the degree of internationalization and business performance of firms in Laos while controlling other factors. Specifically, if firms have a degree of internationalization lower than 0.4374, they will suffer losses due to the high cost of preparing for phase 1 which is market penetration. Then, when the degree of internationalization continues to increase from 0.4374 to 0.9131, firms will gain benefits from internationalization (phase 2), however, these benefits will deteriorate when the degree of internationalization is greater than 0.9131 (phase 3), meaning that firms will no longer be able to exploit economies of scale or advantages in target markets, or product cycles will fall into a state of decline. Interestingly, we also found that firms with a high concentration level of ownership and internationalization activities may achieve better performance than those with a low concentration of ownership and one which carried out internationalization activities.
Keywords
Internationalization; Business Performance; S-Curve; Heckman; Laos;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 6  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Capar, N., & Kotabe, M. (2003). The relationship between international diversification and performance in service firms. Journal of International Business Studies .Vol.34, pp 345-355.   DOI
2 Cyert, R. M. & March, J. G. (1963). A behavioral Theory of the Firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
3 Chung, C. C., Lu, J. W., & Beamish, P. W. (2008). Multinational networks during times of economic crisis versus stability. Management International Review, 48(3), 279-296.   DOI
4 Chung, C. C., Lee, S. H., Beamish, P. W., Southam, C., & Nam, D. D. (2013). Pitting real options theory against risk diversification theory: International diversification and joint ownership control in economic crisis. Journal of World Business, 48(1), 122-136.   DOI
5 Chung, C. C., Lee, S. H., Beamish, P. W., & Isobe, T. (2010). Subsidiary expansion/contraction during times of economic crisis. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(3), 500-516.   DOI
6 Chiao, Y. C., Yang, K. P., & Yu, C. M. J. (2006). Performance, internationalization, and firm-specific advantages of SMEs in a newly-industrialized economy. Small Business Economics, 26(5), 475-492.   DOI
7 Collins, J. M. (1990). A market performance comparison of US firms active in domestic, developed and developing countries. Journal of International Business Studies, 21(2), 271-287.   DOI
8 Contractor, F. J. (2012). Why do multinational firms exist? A theory note about the effect of multinational expansion on performance and recent methodological critiques. Global Strategy Journal, 2(4), 318-331.   DOI
9 Contractor, F. J., Kundu, S. K., & Hsu, C. C. (2003). A threestage theory of international expansion: The link between multinationality and performance in the service sector. Journal of International Business Studies, 34(1), 5-18.   DOI
10 Zahra, S. A., Ireland, R. D., & Hitt, M. A. (2000). International expansion by new venture firms: International diversity, mode of market entry, technological learning, and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 43(5), 925-950.   DOI
11 Fernandez-Olmos, M., Gargallo-Castel, A., & Giner-Bagues, E. (2016). Internationalisation and performance in Spanish family SMES: The W-curve. BRQ Business Research Quarterly, 19(2), 122-136.   DOI
12 Contractor, F. J., Kumar, V., & Kundu, S. K. (2007). Nature of the relationship between international expansion and performance: The case of emerging market firms. Journal of World Business, 42(4), 401-417.   DOI
13 Dahya, J., Dimitrov, O., & McConnell, J. J. (2008). Dominant shareholders, corporate boards, and corporate value: A crosscountry analysis. Journal of Financial Economics, 87(1), 73-100.   DOI
14 Do, T. T. (2020). Critical Factors Affecting the Salaries of Employees of Manufacturing Enterprises in Vietnam. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics, and Business, 7(6), 485-494. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2020.vol7.no6.485   DOI
15 Grant, R. M., Jammine, A. P., & Thomas, H. (1988). Diversity, diversification, and profitability among British manufacturing companies, 1972-1984. Academy of Management Journal, 31(4), 771-801.   DOI
16 Hsu, W. T., Chen, H. L., & Cheng, C. Y. (2013). Internationalization and firm performance of SMEs: The moderating effects of CEO attributes. Journal of World Business, 48(1), 1-12.   DOI
17 Glaum, M., & Oesterle, M. J. (2007). 40 years of research on internationalization and firm performance: More questions than answers? Management International Review, 47, 307-317. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11575-007-0018-0   DOI
18 Gorton, G., & Kahl, M. (2008). Blockholder Scarcity, Takeovers, and Ownership Structures. Journal of Financial & Quantitative Analysis, 43(4), 937-974   DOI
19 Guillen, M. F., & Garcia-Canal, E. (2009). The American model of the multinational firm and the "new" multinationals from emerging economies. Academy of Management Perspectives, 23(2), 23-35.   DOI
20 Hitt, M. A., Hoskisson, R. E., & Kim, H. (1997). International diversification: Effects on innovation and firm performance in product-diversified firms. Academy of Management journal, 40(4), 767-798.   DOI
21 Hymer, S. H. (1976). The International Operations of National Firms: A Study of Direct Foreign Investment. Cambridge. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
22 Johanson, J., & Vahlne, J. E. (1977). The internationalization process of the firm-A model of knowledge development and increasing foreign market commitments. Journal of International Business Studies, 8(1), 23-32.   DOI
23 Lauterbach, B., & Vaninsky, A. (1999). Ownership structure and firm performance: Evidence from Israel. Journal of Management and Governance, 3(2), 189-201.   DOI
24 Mathews, J. A. (2002). Dragon multinational: A new model for global growth. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
25 Michel, A., & Shaked, I. (1986). Multinational corporations vs. domestic corporations: Financial performance and characteristics. Journal of International Business Studies, 17(3), 89-100.   DOI
26 Nguyen, T. N. L., & Nguyen, V. C. (2020). The Determinants of Profitability in Listed Enterprises: A Study from Vietnamese Stock Exchange. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics, and Business, 7(1), 47-58. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2020.vol7.no1.47   DOI
27 Li, L. (2007). Multinationality and performance: A synthetic review and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 9(2), 117-139.   DOI
28 Lin, W. T., Liu, Y., & Cheng, K. Y. (2011). The internationalization and performance of a firm: Moderating effect of a firm's behavior. Journal of International Management, 17(1), 83-95.   DOI
29 Lu, J. W., & Beamish, P. W. (2001). The internationalization and performance of SMEs. Strategic Management Journal, 22(6-7), 565-586.   DOI
30 Almodovar, P., & Rugman, A. M. (2014). The M Curve and the Performance of Spanish International New Ventures. British Journal of Management, 25(S1). DOI: 10.1111/1467-8551.12022
31 Altaf, N., & Shah, F. A. (2015). Internationalization and firm performance of Indian firms: Does product diversity matter?. Pacific Science Review B: Humanities and Social Sciences, 1(2), 76-84.   DOI
32 Cameron, A. C., & Trivedi, P. K. (2005). Microeconometrics: Methods and Applications. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511811241
33 Stinchcombe, A. L. (1965) Social Structure and Organizations. Handbook of Organizations. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally. DOI:10.1016/S0742-3322(00)17019-6
34 Lu, J. W., & Beamish, P. W. (2004). International diversification and firm performance: The S-curve hypothesis. Academy of Management Journal, 47(4), 598-609.   DOI
35 Pangarkar, N. (2008). Internationalization and performance of small-and medium-sized enterprises. Journal of World Business, 43(4), 475-485.   DOI
36 Peng, M. W., Wang, D. Y., & Jiang, Y. (2008). An institution-based view of international business strategy: A focus on emerging economies. Journal of International Business Studies, 39(5), 920-936.   DOI
37 Tu, P. A. & Uyen, T. T. T. (2017). A study of the relationship between internationalization and firm performance: A case study of firms in the service sector in Indonesia. VNU Journal of Science: Economics and Business, 33(1), 1-11.
38 Sanyal, S., Hisam, M. W., & Baawain, A. M. S. (2020). Entrepreneurial Orientation, Network Competence and Human Capital: The Internationalization of SMEs in Oman. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 7(8), 473-483. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2020.vol7.no8.473   DOI
39 Wang, C. F., Chen, L. Y., & Chang, S. C. (2011). International diversification and the market value of new product introduction. Journal of International Management, 17(4), 333-347.   DOI
40 Wooldridge, J. M. (1995). Selection corrections for panel data models under conditional mean independence assumptions. Journal of Econometrics, 68(1), 115-132.   DOI
41 Xiao, S. S., Jeong, I., Moon, J. J., Chung, C. C., & Chung, J. (2013). Internationalization and performance of firms in China: Moderating effects of governance structure and the degree of centralized control. Journal of International Management, 19(2), 118-137.   DOI