Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2020.vol7.no10.803

The Influence of the Debt Ratio and Enterprise Performance of Joint Stock Companies of Vietnam National Coal and Mineral Industries Holding Corp.  

HOANG, Thi Thuy (Hanoi University of Mining and Geology)
HOANG, Lien Thi (Hanoi University of Pharmacy)
PHI, Thi KimThu (Hanoi University of Mining and Geology)
NGUYEN, Minh Thu (Hanoi University of Mining and Geology)
PHAN, Minh Quang (Hanoi University of Mining and Geology)
Publication Information
The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business / v.7, no.10, 2020 , pp. 803-810 More about this Journal
Abstract
This objective of this study is to enrich the literature by the debt ratio and enterprise performance of Joint stock companies of Vietnam National Coal and Mineral Industries Holding Corporation Limited (Vinacomin). The debt ratio is an important index of capital structure, and it influences and decides the enterprise performance. Therefore, the determination of reasonable debt ratio level is beneficial to the stable operation of Vinacomin's enterprises. Based on the research conclusion about the effect on capital structure of debt ratio from domestic and foreign scholar, collecting data from 2014-2018 of Vinacomin's enterprises as a research sample, the article conducts research on the relationship between debt ratio and business performance of Vinacomin, as measured by return on total Assets. In addition, the study uses free cash flow, company size, growth opportunity, investment opportunities, operating costs to sales ratio as control variables.The study shows the debt ratio of Joint stock companies of Vietnam National Coal and Mineral Industries Holding Corporation Limited has a negative effect on the enterprise performance. Furthermore, the research results of the article are references for Vinacomin' enterprises in the course of production and business activities, determining a reasonable debt ratio, and improving the operational performance of enterprises.
Keywords
Capital Structure; Debt Ratio; Enterprise Performance; Vinacomin;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 14  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Tran, N. B., & Nguyen, D. H. (2017). Analyze the impact of capital structure on the performance of joint stock companies in Thua Thien Hue province. Journal of Economics and Management Science, (4), 1-14. [Vietnamese]. https://csdlkhoahoc.hueuni.edu.vn/data/2018/12/Bai_bao_-_Co_cau_von.pdf.
2 Xiong, J. P. (2013). Capital structure and enterprise performance - The empirical analysis of auto industry in China. Journal of Chongqing University of Science and Technology, 27(7), 42-49. [Chinese].
3 Zeitun, R., & Tian, G. G. (2007). Capital structure and corporate performance evidence from Jordan. Australasian Accounting Business & Finance Journal, 1(4), 40-61. doi:10.14453/aabfj.v1i4.3.   DOI
4 Zhang, S. (2017). Conflict of Interest. Debt Financing. Capital Structure: A review. Journal of Chongqing Technology and Business University, 30(2), 23-29. [Chinese].   DOI
5 Mukhibad, H., Subowo, S., Maharin, D. O., & Mukhtar, S. (2020). Determinants of Debt Policy for Public Companies in Indonesia. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics, and Business, 7(6), 29-37. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2020.vol7.no6.029   DOI
6 Nguyen, A. H., Pham, H. T., & Nguyen, H. T. (2020). Impact of working capital management on firm's profitability: Empirical evidence from Vietnam. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 7(3), 115-125. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2020.vol7.no3.115.   DOI
7 Nguyen, C. T., Bui, C. M., & Pham, T. D. (2019). Corporate capital structure adjustments: Evidence from Vietnam stock exchange market. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 6(3), 41-53. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2019.vol6.no3.41   DOI
8 Nguyen, P. A., Nguyen, A. H., & Nguyen, P. V. (2019). The relationship between productivity and firm's performance: Evidence from listed firms in Vietnam stock exchange. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Bussiness, 6(3), 131-140. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2019.vol6.no3.131.   DOI
9 Nguyen, T. N. L., & Nguyen, V. C. (2020). The determinants of profitability in listed enterprises: A study from Vietnamese stock exchange. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 7(1), 47-58. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2020.vol7.no1.47.   DOI
10 Nguyen, T. D. K., & Ramachandran, et al. (2006). Capital structure in small and medium sized enterprises: The case of VietNam. ASEAN Economic Bullentin, 23(2), 192-209. https://doi.org/10.1355/ae23-2d.   DOI
11 Onaolapo, A. A., & Kajola, S. O. (2010). Capital structure and firm : Evidan from Nigeria. European Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative, 25, 70-80.
12 Rahman, M. M., & Saima, F. N. (2018). Efficiency of board composition on firm performance: Empirical evidence from listed manufacturing firms of Bangladesh. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Bussiness, 5(2), 53-61. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2018.vol5.no2.53   DOI
13 Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305-360, https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X.   DOI
14 Dessi, R., & Robertson, D. (2003). Debt, incentives and performance: Evidence from UK panel data. Economic Journal, 113(490), 903-919. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0297.t01-1-00159   DOI
15 Donaldson, G. (1961). Corporate debt capacity: A study of corporate debt capacity. Cambridge, MA: Division of Research, Harvard School of Business Administration.
16 Dong, L. (2006). The effect of structural difference of debt financing on performance of listed companies. Journal of Zhongnan University of Economics and Law, 4-9. [Chinese].
17 Johl, S. K., Kaur, S., & Cooper, B. J. (2015). Board Characteristics and Firm Performance: Evidence from Malaysian Public Listed Firms. Journal of Economics, Business and Management, 3(2), 239-243   DOI
18 Majumdar, S. K., & Chhibber, P. P. (1999). Capiatal structure and performance: Evidence from a transition economy on an aspect of corporate govermance. Public Choice, (98), 287-305. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018355127454.
19 Mo, S. (2008). An empirical study on Capital structure and profitability: Based on China's real estate industry. Communication of Finance and Accounting, (8), 15-17. [Chinese].
20 Modigliani, F., & Miller, M. H. (1958). The cost of capital, Corporation Finance and the theory of investment. American Economic Review, 48(3), 261 - 297. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1809766
21 Modigliani, F., & Miller, M. H. (1963). Corporate income taxes and the cost of capital: A correction. The American Economic Review, 53(3), 433 - 443. https://doi.org/10.46281/afbr.v3i1.244.
22 Bhaduri, S. N. (2002). Determinants of corporate borrowings: Some evidence from the Indian corporate. Journal of Economics and Finance, 26, 200-215. doi:10.1007/BF02755986.   DOI
23 Altuwaijri, B. M., & Kalyanaraman. L. (2020). CEO Education-Performance Relationship: Evidence from Saudi Arabia. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 7(8), 259-268. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2020.vol7.no8.259   DOI
24 Berger, A., & Patti, E. B. D. (2006). Capital structure and firm performance: A new approach to testing agency theory and an application to the banking industry. Journal of Banking & Finance, 30(4), 1065-1102. doi:10.1016/j.jbankfin.2005.05.015   DOI