Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2020.vol7.no10.109

Determinant Factors' Impact on Managerial Performance through Management Accounting Systems in Indonesia  

FUADAH, Luk Luk (Department of Accounting, Faculty of Economics, Universitas Sriwijaya)
SAFITRI, Rika Henda (Department of Accounting, Faculty of Economics, Universitas Sriwijaya)
YULIANI, Yuliani (Department of Management, Faculty of Economics, Universitas Sriwijaya)
ARISMAN, Anton (Department of Accounting, Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi Multi Data Palembang)
Publication Information
The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business / v.7, no.10, 2020 , pp. 109-117 More about this Journal
Abstract
This study aims to examine the effects of factors related to management accounting systems and managerial performance. The factors include budgetary participation, decentralization, and management style. Furthermore, this research investigates the consequences of the management accounting systems on managerial performance and the direct effect between management style and budgetary participation on managerial performance. Survey questionnaires were distributed to both public and private hospitals in Palembang, the South Sumatera region, Indonesia. The sample consisted of 62 respondents from 15 hospitals Target respondents were all managers in hospitals, including financial managers, service managers, human resource managers, quality managers, and other managers. The questionnaire was distributed online to each hospital, and approximately five or more questionnaires were hardcopies. This research was conducted over less than six months. The data obtained were processed via excel files, then checked for conformity, and analyzed by partial least square (PLS) software with descriptive statistics. This study uses path analysis, which that is structural equation modeling (SEM). The findings show that management style, decentralization, and budgetary participation significantly affect management accounting systems. However, management style and budgetary participation did not influence managerial performance. Finally, the findings indicate that management accounting systems are positively affected by managerial performance.
Keywords
Budgetary Participation; Management Style; Decentralization; Management Accounting Systems; Managerial Performance;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 8  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Stergiou, K., Ashraf, J., & Uddin, S. (2013). The role of structure and agency in management accounting control change of a family owned firm: A Greek case study. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 24(1), 62-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2012.09.007   DOI
2 Tsui, J. S. L. (2001). The impact of culture on the relationship between budgetary participation , management accounting systems , and managerial performance : An analysis of Chinese and Western managers. The International Journal of Accounting and Business Society, 36, 125-146.   DOI
3 Waterhouse, J. H., & Tjessen, P. (1978). A Contingency Framework for Management Accounting Systems Research. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 3(1), 65-76.   DOI
4 Parsian, H. (2015). Budgetary participation and managerial performance : The impact of information and environmental volatility Budgetary participation and managerial performance : The impact of information and environmental volatility. Management Science Letters, (July), 843-854. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.msl.2015.7.001   DOI
5 Ramsey, S. L., Lord, C. G., Wallace, D. S., & Pugh, M. A. (1994). The role of subtypes in attitudes towards superordinate social categories. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33(4), 387-403. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.1994.tb01036.x   DOI
6 Simons, R. (1995). Levers of Control. Boston, Massachussets: Harvard Business School Press.
7 Yousef, D. A. (2000). Organizational commitment: A mediator of the relationships of leadership behavior with job satisfaction and performance in a non-western country. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 15(1), 6-24. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940010305270   DOI
8 Rowold, J. (2011). Relationship between leadership behaviors and performance: The moderating role of a work team's level of age, gender, and cultural heterogeneity. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 32(6), 628-647. https://doi.org/10.1108/01437731111161094   DOI
9 Saleh, C., Hayat, H., Sumartono, S., & Pratiwi, R. N. (2020). Moderating of Religiosity on Reward and Engagement : Empirical Study in Indonesia Public Service *. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 7(6), 287-296. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2020.vol7.no6.   DOI
10 Simons, R. (1990). The role of management control systems in creating competitive advantage: New perspectives. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 15(1-2), 127-143. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(90)90018-P
11 Soobaroyen, T., & Poorundersing, B. (2008). The effectiveness of management accounting systems. Managerial Auditing Journal, 23(2), 187-219. https://doi.org/10.1108/02686900810839866   DOI
12 Otley, D. T. (1980). The contingency theory of management accounting: Achievement and prognosis. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 5(4), 413-428. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(80)90040-9   DOI
13 Mahoney, T. A., Jerdee, T. H., & Carroll, S. J. (1965). The Job ( s ) of Management. Journal of Management, 97-110.
14 Jatmiko, B., Laras, T., & Rohmawati, A. (2020). Budgetary Participation , Organizational Commitment , and Performance of Local Government Apparatuses. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 7(7), 379-390. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2020.vol7.no7.379   DOI
15 Larson, L. L., Bussom, R. S., Vigars, W., & Jauch, L. (1986). Proactive Versus Reactive Manager: Is the Dichotomy Realistic? Journal of Management Studies, 23(4), 385-400.   DOI
16 Libby, T., & Waterhouse, J. H. (1996). Predicting Change in Management Accounting Systems. JMAR, 8, 137-150.
17 Mia, L., & Clarke, B. (1999). Market competition , management accounting systems and business unit performance. Management Accounting Research, 10, 137-158.   DOI
18 Naranjo-Gil, D., & Van Rinsum, M. (2006). The Effect of Management Style and Management Accounting System Design on Performance. Jamar, 4(1).
19 Nguyen, H. Q., Thi, O., & Le, T. (2020). Factors Affecting the Intention to Apply Management Accounting in Enterprises in Vietnam *. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 7(6), 95-107. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2020.vol7.no6.095   DOI
20 Ogbonna, E., & Harris, L. C. (2000). Leadership style, organizational culture and performance: Empirical evidence from UK companies. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 11(4), 766-788. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585190050075114   DOI
21 Otley, D. (2016). The contingency theory of management accounting and control: 1980-2014. Management Accounting Research, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2016.02.001
22 Gurendrawati, E., & Murdayanti, Y. (2015). The Impact Of Information Technology, Management Accounting System Characteristics, and Locus Of Control To The Managerial Performance In The. Review of Integrative Business & Economics, 4(1), 357-366.
23 Etemadi, H., Dilami, Z. D., Bazaz, M. S., & Parameswaran, R. (2009). Culture, management accounting and managerial performance: Focus Iran. Advances in Accounting, 25(2), 216-225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adiac.2009.08.005
24 Ghasemi, R., Mohamad, N. A., Karami, M., & Bajuri, N. H. (2016). The Mediating Effect of Management Accounting System on the Relationship between Competition and Managerial Performance. International Journal of Accounting and Information Management, 24(3), 1-28.
25 Gul, F. (1991). The Effects of Management Accounting Systems and Environmental Uncertainty on Small Business Managers ' Performance. Accounting & Business Research, 22(85), 57-61. https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.1991.9729418   DOI
26 Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis. Pearson Publisher. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2011.02.019
27 Chia, Y. M. (1995). Decentralization, Management Accounting System (MAS) Information Characteristics and Their Interaction Effects on Managerial Performance: A Singapore Study. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 22(February 1994), 811-831.   DOI
28 Hammad, S., Jusoh, R., & Ghozali, I. (2013). Decentralization, perceived environmental uncertainty, managerial performance and management accounting system information in Egyptian hospitals. International Journal of Accounting & Information Management, 21(4), 314-330. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJAIM-02-2012-0005   DOI
29 Hoque, Z. (2011). The relations among competition , delegation , management accounting systems change and performance : A path model. Advances in Accounting, Incorporating Advances in International Accounting, 27(2), 266-277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adiac.2011.05.006
30 Indriani, M., & Nadirsyah. (2015). Interaction Effect of Budgetary Participation and Management Accounting System on Managerial Performance: Evidence from Indonesia. Global Journal of Business Research, 9(1), 1-13.
31 Chong, K. M., & Mahama, H. (2014). The impact of interactive and diagnostic uses of budgets on team effectiveness. Management Accounting Research, 25(3), 206-222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2013.10.008   DOI
32 Chong, V. K. (1996). Management Accounting Systems, Task Uncertainty and Managerial Performance: A Research Note. Accounting, Organizations & Society, 21(5), 415-421.   DOI
33 Chong, V. K., & Eggleton, I. R. C. (2003). The decision-facilitating role of management accounting systems on managerial performance: The influence of locus of control and task uncertainty. Advances in Accounting, 20(03), 165-197. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0882-6110(03)20008-0   DOI
34 Chung, S.-H., Su, Y.-F., & Su, Y.-J. (2012). Broad scope management accounting system and managerial performance : The impact of role ambiguity and functional difference. African Journal of Business Management, 6(30), 8873-8878. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJBM11.2181
35 Elenkov, D. S. (2002). Effects of leadership on organizational performance in Russian companies. Journal of Business Research, 55(6), 467-480. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-2963(00)00174-0   DOI
36 Ali, Q., Salman, A., Yaacob, H., Zaini, Z., & Abdullah, R. (2020). Does Big Data Analytics Enhance Sustainability and Financial Performance ? The Case of ASEAN Banks. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 7(7), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2020.vol7.no7.001   DOI
37 Bouwens, J., & Abernethy, M. A. (2000). The consequences of customization on management accounting system design. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 25(3), 221-241. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-3682(99)00043-4   DOI
38 Dean, J. W., & Sharfman, M. P. (1996). Does decision process matter? A study of strategic decision-making effectiveness. Academy of Management Journal, 39(2), 368-396.   DOI
39 Din, B. H., & Habibullah, M. S. (2015). The adoption of performance measures and management accounting system in enhancing managerial performance in Malaysian local government. Malaysian Journal of Society and Space, 11(13), 24-35.
40 Eker, M. (2009). Management Accounting Systems on Performance of Turkish Middle Level Managers. Akdeniz, (17), 105-126.
41 Cheng, M. (2012). The joint effect of budgetary participation and broad‐scope management accounting systems on management performance. Asian Review of Accounting, 20(3), 184-197. https://doi.org/10.1108/13217341211263256   DOI
42 Brownell, P. (1983). Leadership style, budgetary participation and managerial behavior. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 8(4), 307-321. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(83)90046-6   DOI
43 Cadez, S., & Guilding, C. (2008). An exploratory investigation of an integrated contingency model of strategic management accounting. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 33(7-8), 836-863. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2008.01.003
44 Cheng, M.-T. (2012). The joint effect of budgetary participation and broadscope management accounting systems on management performance. Asian Review of Accounting, 20(3), 184-197. https://doi.org/10.1108/13217341211263256   DOI
45 Chenhall, R. H. (2003). Management control sysems design within its organizational context: findings from contigency based research and directions for the future. Accounting, Organizations & Society, 28, 127-168. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5024417   DOI
46 Chenhall, R. H., & Morris, D. (1986). The Impact of Structure, Environment, and Interdependence on the Perceived Usefulness of Management Accounting Systems. The Accounting Review, 61(1), 16-35.
47 Abernethy, M. A., & Lillis, A. M. (2001). Interdependencies in Organization Design : A Test in Hospitals. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 13(1), 107-129.   DOI
48 Abdel-Kader, M., & Luther, R. (2008). The impact of firm characteristics on management accounting practices: A UKbased empirical analysis. British Accounting Review, 40(1), 2-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2007.11.003   DOI
49 Abernethy, M. A., & Brownell, P. (1999). The role of budgets in organizations facing strategic change: An exploratory study. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 24(3), 189-204. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-3682(98)00059-2   DOI