Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.15722/jds.20.09.202209.73

Key Audit Matters Readability and Investor Reaction  

CHIRAKOOL, Wichuta (Mahasarakham Business School, Mahasarakham University)
POONPOOL, Nuttavong (Mahasarakham Business School, Mahasarakham University)
WANGCHAROENDATE, Suwan (Mahasarakham Business School, Mahasarakham University)
BHONGCHIRAWATTANA, Utis (Mahasarakham Business School, Mahasarakham University)
Publication Information
Journal of Distribution Science / v.20, no.9, 2022 , pp. 73-81 More about this Journal
Abstract
Purpose: This study aimed to examine whether key audit matters (KAMs) readability influences investor reaction. Research design, data, and methodology: The signaling theory was applied to explain the behavior of investors when they receive useful information for their decisions. Data were collected from 1,866 firm-year observations from Thai listed companies in both the Stock Exchange of Thailand (SET) and the Market for Alternative Investment (MAI) for the fiscal years of 2016-2019. The study was based on secondary data, which were collected from the SET Market Analysis and Reporting Tool (SETSMART) database and the Stock Exchange of Thailand's website (www.set.or.th). A statistical regression method was used with panel data analysis to evaluate possible associations between KAMs readability and investor reaction. The study relied on popular readability measures (Fog Index). Moreover, investor reaction was measured by absolute cumulative abnormal return and abnormal trading volume. Results: It was found that the KAMs readability has positive significance on both absolute cumulative abnormal return and abnormal trading volume. Conclusion: This study showed a significant contribution to the implication of KAMs in an emerging economy. The results reveal that more readable KAMs disclosure distributed new insights and useful information to investors and led to reducing the information gap between auditors and investors.
Keywords
Key Audit Matters; Readability; Investor Reaction; Audit Report Distribution; Emerging Market;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 4  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Bedard, J., Gonthier-Besacier, N., & Schatt, A. (2015). Analysis of the Consequences of the Disclosure of Key Audit Matters in the Audit Report. The British Accounting and Finance Association (BAFA) 25th Audit & Assurance Conference, Edinburgh University.
2 Reid, L. C., Carcello, J. V., Li, C., Neal, T. L., & Francis, J. R. (2019). Impact of Auditor Report Changes on Financial Reporting Quality and Audit Costs: Evidence from the United Kingdom. Contemporary Accounting Research, 36(3), 1501-1539.   DOI
3 Salehi, M., Kamalahmadi, S., & Bahrami, M. (2014). Prediction of Auditor Selection Using a Combination of PSO Algorithm and CART in Iran. Journal of Distribution Science, 12(3), 33-41.   DOI
4 Sirois, L. P., Bedard, J., & Bera, P. (2018). The Informational Value of Key Audit Matters in the Auditor's Report: Evidence from an Eye-tracking Study. Accounting Horizons, 32(2), 141-162.   DOI
5 Shin, I. H. (2019). Market Competition and Audit Quality in Distribution and Service Industries. Journal of Distribution Science, 17(4), 33-39.   DOI
6 Smith, K. (2016). Tell Me More: A Content Analysis of Expanded Auditor Reporting in the United Kingdom. The British Accounting and Finance Association (BAFA) 26th Audit & Assurance Conference, University of Oxford.
7 Spence, M. (1973). Job Market Signaling. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87(3), 355-374.   DOI
8 Lennox, C. S., Schmidt, J. J., & Thompson, A. M. (2022). Why are Expanded Audit Reports Not Informative to Investors? Evidence from the United Kingdom. Review of Accounting Studies. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-021-09650-4   DOI
9 Suttipun, M. (2020). KAM Reporting and Common Share Price of Listed Companies in the Market of Alternative Investment from Thailand. Academy of Accounting and Financial Studies Journal, 24(3), 1-10.
10 Velte, P. (2018). Does Gender Diversity in the Audit Committee Influence Key Audit Matters' Readability in the Auditor's Report? UK Evidence. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 25(4), 748-755.   DOI
11 Czerney, K., Schmidt, J. J., & Thompson, A. M. (2019). Do Investors Respond to Explanatory Language Included in Unqualified Auditor's Reports? Contemporary Accounting Research, 36(1), 198-229.   DOI
12 Kitiwong, W., & Sarapaivanich, N. (2020). Consequences of the Implementation of Expanded Audit Reports with Key Audit Matters (KAMs) on Audit Quality. Managerial Auditing Journal, 35(8), 1095-1119.   DOI
13 Suttipun, M. (2021). External Auditor and KAMs Reporting in Alternative Capital Market of Thailand. Meditari Accountancy Research, 30(1), 74-93.   DOI
14 Valipour, H., Salehi, F., & Bahrami, M. (2013). Predicting Audit Reports Using Meta-Heuristic Algorithms. Journal of Distribution Science, 11(6), 13-19.   DOI
15 Velte, P., & Issa, J. (2019). The Impact of Key Audit Matter (KAM) Disclosure in Auditor's Reports on Stakeholders' Reactions: A Literature Review. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 17(3), 323-341.   DOI
16 Asare, S. K., & Wright, A. M. (2012). Investors', Auditors', and Lenders' Understanding of the Message Conveyed by the Standard Auditor's Report on the Financial Statements. Accounting Horizons, 26(2), 193-217.   DOI
17 Washburn, M. (2017). The Effect of Auditing Standard No. 5 on Audit Delay and Audit Fees. Nova Southeastern University.
18 Baltagi, B. (2008). Econometric Analysis of Panel Data (5th ed.). John Wiley & Sons, Great Britain.
19 Christensen, B. E., Glover, S. M., & Wolfe, C. J. (2014). Do Critical Audit Matter Paragraphs in the Audit Report Change Nonprofessional Investors' Decision to Invest? Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 33(4), 71-93.   DOI
20 Cameron, A. C., & Trivedi, P. K. (2005). Microeconometrics: Methods and Applications. Cambridge university press.
21 Gutierrez, E., Minutti-Meza, M., Tatum, K. W., & Vulcheva, M. (2018). Consequences of Adopting an Expanded Auditor's Report in the United Kingdom. Review of Accounting Studies, 23(4), 1543-1587.   DOI
22 Hausman, J. A. (1978). Specification Tests in Econometrics. Econometrica: Journal of the econometric society, 46, 1251-1271.   DOI
23 Loughran, T., & McDonald, B. (2016). Textual Analysis in Accounting and Finance: A Survey. Journal of Accounting Research, 54(4), 1187-1230.   DOI
24 Park, H. M. (2011). Practical Guides to Panel Data Modeling: A Step-by-Step Analysis Using Stata. Public Management and Policy Analysis Program, Graduate School of International Relations, International University of Japan, 12, 1-52.
25 Al-mulla, M., & Bradbury, M. E. (2022). Auditor, Client and Investor Consequences of the Enhanced Auditor's Report. International Journal of Auditing, 26(2), 134-150.   DOI
26 Connelly, B. L., Certo, S. T., Ireland, R. D., & Reutzel, C. R. (2011). Signaling Theory: A Review and Assessment. Journal of management, 37(1), 39-67.   DOI
27 Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, New Jersey.
28 Li, F. (2008). Annual Report Readability, Current Earnings, and Earnings Persistence. Journal of Accounting and economics, 45(2-3), 221-247.   DOI
29 Kohler, A., Ratzinger-Sakel, N., & Theis, J. (2020). The Effects of Key Audit Matters on the Auditor's Report's Communicative Value: Experimental Evidence from Investment Professionals and Non-professional Investors. Accounting in Europe, 17(2), 105-128.   DOI
30 Hay, D. (1998). Communication in Auditors' Reports: Variations in Readability and the Effect of Audit Firm Structure. Asia-Pacific Journal of Accounting, 5(2), 179-197.   DOI
31 Seebeck, A., & Kaya, D. (2022). The power of words: an empirical analysis of the communicative value of extended auditor reports. European Accounting Review. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180.2021.2021097   DOI