Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.15722/jds.20.01.202201.55

User Responses Towards Information Distribution of Copyright Law No. 28 of 2014 Concerning Permits for Commercial Use of Music Performing Rights  

MUHIDIASTU, Naufal (Communication Department, BINUS Graduate Program, Bina Nusantara University)
MANI, La (Communication Department, BINUS Graduate Program, Bina Nusantara University)
RASYID, Fariz Ubaidillah (Communication Department, BINUS Graduate Program, Bina Nusantara University)
ZHAFIRAH, Hanan (Communication Department, BINUS Graduate Program, Bina Nusantara University)
ARAS, Muhammad (Communication Department, BINUS Graduate Program, Bina Nusantara University)
Publication Information
Journal of Distribution Science / v.20, no.1, 2022 , pp. 55-65 More about this Journal
Abstract
Purpose: This article discusses public acceptance in the information distribution of Copyright Law no. 28 of 2014 and Government Regulation No. 56 of 2021 in Indonesia concerning the commercial use of music. Hospitality industry is one of the most affected by this regulations, which some hotelsrefused to comply. To get royalties, LMKN approaches with socialization either directly or indirectly to commercial music users. Research design, data and methodology: Quantitative survey by distributing questionnaires, then testing the validity and reliability tests using the SmartPLS application. The population studied were Hotels on Java and Bali Island in Indonesia. The research sample is 100 hotels. Result: R-Square value of 0.706 for the construct (Y) User Response which means that (X) Socialization can explain the variance (Y) User Response of 70.3%. This shows that the level of influence (X) Socialization has an effect on (Y) User Response. Conclusion: User responses regarding the distribution information of the Act indicate the need for socialization, because socialization provides literacy to the public. More frequent socialization will provide a good opportunity to increase the response of commercial music users.
Keywords
Socialization; Music Royalty; User Response; Distribution; Performing Rights;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 5  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Shang, L. (2015). Enjoy your online music carefully: collective management of music copyrights in the USA. International Journal of Intellectual Property Management, 8(-2), 58-77.   DOI
2 Park, S. K., Kwak, K. T., & Lee, B. G. (2019). Policy compliance and deterrence mechanism in the sharing economy. Internet Research, 29(5), 1124-1148. https://doi.org/10.1108/INTR-03-2018-0098   DOI
3 Kim, S. H., & Yoo, B. K. (2015). Analysis of the Factors Affecting Customer Satisfaction and Customer Loyalty in a Family Restaurant Chain. Journal of Distribution Science, 13(5), 103-111. https://doi.org/10.15722/jds.13.5.201505.103   DOI
4 Burgoon, M., & Ruffner, M. (2002). Human Communication. Allyn & Bacon Inc.
5 Xu, J., Benbasat, I., & Cenfetelli, R. T. (2014). The nature and consequences of trade-off transparency in the context of recommendation agents. MIS Quarterly, 38(2), 379-406.   DOI
6 Cadden, T., Cao, G., Yang, Y., McKittrick, A., McIvor, R., & Onofrei, G. (2021). The effect of buyers' socialization efforts on the culture of their key strategic supplier and its impact on supplier operational performance. Production Planning & Control, 32(13), 1102-1118. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2020.1785574   DOI
7 Alvonco, J. (2014). Practical Communication Skill (Pertama). PT. Elex Media Komputindo.
8 Berger, B. A. (2009). Communication Skills for Pharmacists: Building Relationships. American Pharmacists Association.
9 Brechwald, W. A., & Prinstein, M. J. (2011). Beyond homophily: A decade of advances in understanding peer influence processes. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 21(1), 166-179. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-7795.2010.00721.x   DOI
10 Kemp, E. A., Williams, K., Min, D. J., & Chen, H. (2019). Happy feelings: examining music in the service environment. International Hospitality Review, 33(1), 5-15. https://doi.org/10.1108/IHR-10-2018-0019   DOI
11 Checkel, J. T. (2005). International Institutions and Socialization in Europe: Introduction and Framework. International Organization, 59(04), 801-826. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818305050289   DOI
12 Cowell, R., Bristow, G., & Munday, M. (2011). Acceptance, acceptability and environmental justice: the role of community benefits in wind energy development. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 54(4), 539-557. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2010.521047   DOI
13 Giletta, M., Burk, W. J., Scholte, R. H. J., Engels, R. C. M. E., & Prinstein, M. J. (2013). Direct and Indirect Peer Socialization of Adolescent Nonsuicidal Self-Injury. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 23(3), 450-463. https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.12036   DOI
14 Dane, C., Feist, A., & Laing, D. (1996). The value of music. London: National Music Council, 112.
15 Eysenck, M. W., & Keane, M. T. (2000). Cognitive psychology: A student' s handbook (4th Ed). Lawrence Erlbaum.
16 Sevilla, C. G. (2007). Research Methods (Quezon City: Rex Printing Company).
17 Neuman, W. L. (2017). Metodologi Penelitian Sosial: Pendekatan Kualitatif dan Kuantitatif. Indeks.
18 Ohberg, P., & Naurin, E. (2016). Party-constrained Policy Responsiveness: A Survey Experiment on Politicians' Response to Citizen-initiated Contacts. British Journal of Political Science, 46(4), 785-797. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123415000010   DOI
19 Petrova, M. A. (2016). From NIMBY to acceptance: Toward a novel framework - VESPA - For organizing and interpreting community concerns. Renewable Energy, 86(2), 1280-1294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2015.09.047   DOI
20 Goi, M. T., Kalidas, V., & Yunus, N. (2018). Mediating roles of emotion and experience in the stimulus-organism-response framework in higher education institutions. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 28(1), 90-112. https://doi.org/10.1080/08841241.2018.1425231   DOI
21 Pitt, I. L. (2010). Superstar effects on royalty income in a performing rights organization. Journal of Cultural Economics, 34(3), 219-236. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10824-010-9123-1   DOI
22 Schmidt, A., & Donsbach, W. (2016). Acceptance factors of hydrogen and their use by relevant stakeholders and the media. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 41(8), 4509-4520. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.01.058   DOI
23 Stiff, J. B., & Mongeau, P. A. (2016). Persuasive communication. Guilford Publications.
24 Suryabrata, S. (2000). Metode Penelitian [Research methods]. In PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.
25 Vaske, J. J., Absher, J. D., & Bright, A. D. (2007). Salient value similarity, social trust and attitudes toward wildland fire management strategies. Human Ecology Review, 14(2), 223-232.
26 Westerberg, V., Jacobsen, J. B., & Lifran, R. (2015). Offshore wind farmsin Southern Europe-Determining tourist preference and social acceptance. Energy Research & Social Science, 10(6), 165-179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2015.07.005   DOI
27 Yoon, S. J. (2021). Role of Social Capital and Consumer Citizenship on Sharing Economy Participation on O2O Retail Platforms. Journal of Distribution Science, 19(10), 55-64. https://doi.org/10.15722/jds.19.10.202110.55   DOI
28 He, G., Boas, I. J. C., Mol, A. P. J., & Lu, Y. (2018). What drives public acceptance of chemical industrial park policy and project in China? Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 138(10), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.06.023   DOI
29 Groome, D. (1999). An introduction to cognitive psychology: Processes and disorders. Psychology Press.
30 Haug, J. K., & Stigson, P. (2016). Local Acceptance and Communication as Crucial Elements for Realizing CCS in the Nordic Region. Energy Procedia, 86(2), 315-323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2016.01.032   DOI
31 Heath, R. L. (2013). Encyclopedia of public relations. Sage Publications.
32 Garlin, F. V., & Owen, K. (2006). Setting the tone with the tune: A meta-analytic review of the effects of background music in retail settings. Journal of Business Research, 59(6), 755-764. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2006.01.013   DOI
33 Gilardi, F., & Wasserfallen, F. (2016). How Socialization Attenuates Tax Competition. British Journal of Political Science, 46(1), 45-65. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123414000246   DOI
34 Kim, P. J. (2017). A Study on the Recognition Level of Traditional Market Users on Return Intention. Journal of Industrial Distribution & Business, 8(5), 77-85. https://doi.org/10.13106/ijidb.2017.vol8.no5.77.   DOI
35 Bearce, D. H., & Bondanella, S. (2007). Intergovernmental Organizations, Socialization, and Member-State Interest Convergence. International Organization, 61(04), 703-733. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818307070245   DOI
36 Chang, J., & Kim, T. (2018). Looking at Organizational Socialization from the Developmental Network Perspective. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 5(3), 195-206. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2018.vol5.no3.195   DOI
37 Xenos, M. A., Macafee, T., & Pole, A. (2017). Understanding variationsin user response to social media campaigns: Astudy of Facebook posts in the 2010 US elections. New Media & Society, 19(6), 826-842. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444815616617   DOI
38 Mehrabian, A., & Russell, J. A. (1974). An approach to environmental psychology. the MIT Press.
39 Nanayakkara, G. (2017). Promise and perils of Sri Lankan performers' rights: the royalty collection in music. European Journal of Current Legal Issues, 23(1), 1-29.
40 Nielsen, R. K., & Vaccari, C. (2013). Do people "like" politicians on Facebook? Not really. Large-scale direct candidate-tovoter online communication as an outlier phenomenon. International Journal of Communication, 7(1), 24.
41 Budi, S. C., Hidayat, Z., & Mani, L. (2021). The Effects of Experience and Brand Relationship to Brand Satisfaction, Trust and Loyalty Shopping Distribution of Consumer Philips Lighting Product in Indonesia. Journal of Distribution Science, 19(1), 115-124. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15722/jds.19.1.202101.115   DOI
42 Cziko, G. (2000). The things we do: Using the lessons of Bernard and Darwin to understand the what, how, and why of our behavior. MIT press.
43 Dane, C., & Manton, K. (2002). Counting The Notes. London National Music Council.
44 Upham, P., Oltra, C., & Boso, A. (2015). Towards a crossparadigmatic framework of the social acceptance of energy systems. Energy Research & Social Science, 8(4), 100-112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2015.05.003   DOI
45 Effendy, O. U. (2003). Ilmu, Teori dan Filsafat Komunikasi, Bandung: PT. In Citra Aditya Bakti.
46 Gao, L., & Bai, X. (2014). Online consumer behaviour and its relationship to website atmospheric induced flow: Insights into online travel agencies in China. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 21(4), 653-665. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2014.01.001   DOI
47 Shin, & Joo, J. (2015). Relationships between Customer Socialization, Customer Participation, and Loyalty of On-line Service Providers. Journal of Distribution Science, 13(11), 15-22. https://doi.org/10.15722/jds.13.11.201511.15   DOI
48 Stigka, E. K., Paravantis, J. A., & Mihalakakou, G. K. (2014). Social acceptance of renewable energy sources: A review of contingent valuation applications. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 32(4), 100-106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.12.026   DOI
49 Sugiono. (2012). Memahami Penelitian Kualitatif. Alfabeta.
50 Tausczik, Y., Farzan, R., Levine, J., & Kraut, R. (2018). Effects of Collective Socialization on Newcomers' Response to Feedback in Online Communities. ACM Transactions on Social Computing, 1(2), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1145/3191834   DOI
51 Vieira, V. A. (2013). Stimuli-organism-response framework: A meta-analytic review in the store environment. Journal of Business Research, 66(9), 1420-1426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2012.05.009   DOI
52 Wagner, C. L., & Fernandez-Gimenez, M. E. (2008). Does Community - Based Collaborative Resource Management Increase Social Capital? Society & Natural Resources, 21(4), 324-344. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920701864344   DOI
53 Siegrist, M. (2000). The Influence of Trust and Perceptions of Risks and Benefits on the Acceptance of Gene Technology. Risk Analysis, 20(2), 195-204. https://doi.org/10.1111/0272-4332.202020   DOI
54 Narud, H. M., & Esaiasson, P. (2013). Between-election democracy: The representative relationship after election day. ecpr Press.