Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.15722/jds.20.10.202210.39

International Trade between Colombia and Asia in the Framework of Logistics Processes: A Bibliometric Review  

NIEBLES-NUNEZ, William (School of Economics, Universidad de Sucre)
RAMIREZ, Javier (School of Economic, Corporacion Universitaria Latinoamericana)
GARCIA-TIRADO, Jhony (Corporacion Universitaria Taller Cinco)
Publication Information
Journal of Distribution Science / v.20, no.10, 2022 , pp. 39-50 More about this Journal
Abstract
Purpose: This report aimed to review the literature on the research topic "Imports and exports between Colombia and Asian countries in the framework of logistics processes in international trade" of the last ten years. Research design, data and methodology: Documents indexed in the Web of Science metasearch engine were used as a source of information. The 500 most relevant downloaded in bibTex format were worked on and their processing was carried out using the statistical software Excel and R, through the Bibliometrix package. Results: The results indicate that the country that makes the most contributions to the research area is the United States (274), the author that publishes the most is Bahmani-Oskooee M., with (11) research, 424 of the documents found are journal articles, and the institution that contributes the most in this area is the University of Wisconsin. Conclusions: It is concluded that scientific production within the framework of international trade between Asia and Colombia has had a notable increase, which can be explained by the opening of both continents as strategic allies and the new vision of logistics processes taking advantage of the strategic location of countries within the Pacific Ocean.
Keywords
Import; Export; Colombia; Asia; Logistics;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Becerril, O., Munguia, G., & Nava, R. (2021). Effect of container movement on the efficiency of the main cargo operating economies of APEC. Mexico and the Pacific Rim, 10(30), 141-168. https://doi.org/10.32870/mycp.v10i30.739   DOI
2 Borquez, A. (2022). Trade Facilitation Under the Pacific Alliance Framework: Seaports Case. In China's Trade Policy in Latin America. Springer, Cham, 133-145. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-98664-3_9   DOI
3 Cadot, O., Carrere, C., & Strauss-Kahn, V. (2013). Trade diversification, income, and growth: what do we know? Journal of Economic Surveys, 27(4), 790-812. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6419.2011.00719.x   DOI
4 Cantillo, J., Cantillo, V., & Arellana, J. (2018). Modelling with joint choice of ports and countries of origin and destination: application to Colombian ports. Maritime Policy & Management, 45(6), 720-738. https://doi.org/10.1080/03088839.2018.1440090   DOI
5 Dorta, A. (2018). Science with measures. Bibliometric and scientometric studiesin a new section. Havana Journal of Medical Sciences, 17(4), 508-509. http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1729-519X2018000400508
6 Kollie, G. B. (2022). International Trade, Economic Growth and Governance: Evidence from ECOWAS Member Countries. African Journal of Economic Review, 10(3), 150-166. https://www.ajol.info/index.php/ajer/article/view/227067
7 MasIc, I. (2021). Bibliometric Indices and its Role for the Quality Assessment of the Author's Published Content in the Scientific Journals. Int J Biomed Healthc, 9(4), 244-253. https://doi.org/10.5455/ijbh.2021.9.244-253   DOI
8 Tang, X., Snowden, S., & Hook, M. (2013). Analysis of energy embodied in the international trade of UK. Energy Policy, 57(1), 418-428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.02.009   DOI
9 Haug, A. A. & Ucal, M. (2019). The role of trade and FDI for CO2 emissions in Turkey: Nonlinear relationships. Energy Economics, 81(1), 297-307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2019.04.006   DOI
10 Su, B. & Ang, B. W. (2013). Input-output analysis of CO2 emissions embodied in trade: competitive versus noncompetitive imports. Energy Policy, 56(1), 83-87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.01.041   DOI
11 Tomas-Gorriz, V. & Tomas-Castera, V. (2018). Bibliometrics in the evaluation of scientific activity. Home Hospital, 2(4), 145-163. https://doi.org/10.22585/hospdomic.v2i4.51   DOI
12 Torres, G. (2021). Colombia and Asia-Pacific: an analysis of the evolution of relations with this important zone. Razon Critica, 1(11), 183-202. https://doi.org/10.21789/25007807.1697   DOI
13 Murugan, M., Saravanakumar, R., & Thirumagal, A. (2019). Lotka's law and pattern of author productivity of information literacy research output. Library Philosophy and Practice, 2509(1), 1-18. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/215162173.pdf
14 Engel, C. & Wang, J. (2011). International trade in durable goods: Understanding volatility, cyclicality, and elasticities. Journal of International Economics, 83(1), 37-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2010.08.007   DOI
15 Alves, F. (2019). Exemplifying the Bradford's Law: an analysis of recent research (2014-2019) on capital structure. Journal of Social Sciences in Perspective, 18(35), 92-101. https://doi.org/10.48075/revistacsp.v18i35.21801   DOI
16 Aristei, D., Castellani, D., & Franco, C. (2013). Firms' exporting and importing activities: is there a two-way relationship? Review of World Economics, 149(1), 55-84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10290-012-0137-y   DOI
17 Arize, A. & Bahmani, M. (2018). Do imports and exports adjust nonlinearly? Evidence from 100 countries. Global Economy Journal, 18(1), 1-30. https://doi.org/10.1515/gej-2017-0094   DOI
18 Barajas, J. & Mendez, M. (2021). Traditional Farmers Producing for the Agricultural Export Market: Causes and Consequences of Said Productive Change. Lasallian Journal of Research, 18(1), 65-83. https://doi.org/10.22507/rli.v18n1a5   DOI
19 Kasahara, H., & Rodrigue, J. (2008). Does the use of imported intermediates increase productivity? Plant-level evidence. Journal of Development Economics, 87(1), 106-118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2007.12.008   DOI
20 Kasahara, H., & Lapham, B. (2013). Productivity and the decision to import and export: Theory and evidence. Journal of International Economics, 89(2), 297-316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2012.08.005   DOI
21 Figueiredo, R., Quelhas, O., Vieira, J., & Ferreira, J. J. (2019). The role of knowledge intensive business services in economic development: a bibliometric analysis from Bradford, Lotka and Zipf laws. Management and Production, 26(4), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1590/0104-530X4356-19   DOI
22 Nattar, S. (2019). Application of Lotka's law to the scientific production of Indian Journal of Physics. International Journal of Library and Information Studies, 9(1), 36-42.
23 Price, D. (1986). Little science, big science... and beyond. New York: Columbia University Press.
24 Bas, M. & Strauss, V. (2014). Does importing more inputs raise exports? Firm-level evidence from France. Review of World Economics, 150(2), 241-275. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10290-013-0175-0   DOI
25 Bernal, G., Strobel, J. A. A., & Praj, D. P. (2019). Approaches to the new world scenario: Colombia on the Asia Pacific region. Scenarios: company and territory, 8(11), 1-26. http://esumer.edu.co/revistas/index.php/escenarios/article/view/17
26 Bobadilla, J. & Venegas, A. (2018). The importance of ports within the economy in Colombia and its bordering countries. Point of View, 9(13), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.15765/pdv.v9i13.1115   DOI
27 Fan, H., Li, Y. A., & Yeaple, S. R. (2015). Trade liberalization, quality, and export prices. Review of Economics and Statistics, 97(5), 1033-1051. https://doi.org/10.1162/REST_a_00524   DOI
28 Feng, L., Li, Z., & Swenson, D. L. (2016). The connection between imported intermediate inputs and exports: Evidence from Chinese firms. Journal of International Economics, 101(1), 86-101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2016.03.004   DOI
29 Flores, C. & Aguilera, R. (2019). Bibliometric indicators and their importance in clinical research. Why know them? Journal of the Spanish pain society, 26(5), 315-316. https://dx.doi.org/10.20986/resed.2018.3659/2018   DOI
30 Giuffrida, M., Mangiaracina, R., Perego, A., & Tumino, A. (2019). Cross-border B2C e-commerce to China: An evaluation of different logistics solutions under uncertainty. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 50(3), 355-378. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPDLM-08-2018-0311   DOI
31 Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133(1), 285-296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070   DOI
32 Caceres, J. (2022). Chinese Export Promotion Policies Toward Latin America: The Belt and Road Initiative. In China's Trade Policy in Latin America. Springer, Cham, 63-78. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-98664-3_5   DOI
33 Capobianco, M., Casado, M., Marin, G., & Teran, E. (2019). A bibliometric analysis of international competitiveness (1983-2017). Sustainability, 11(7), 1877-1899. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11071877   DOI
34 Dedeoglu, D. & Kaya, H. (2013). Energy use, exports, imports, and GDP: New evidence from the OECD countries. Energy Policy, 57(1), 469-476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.02.016   DOI
35 Vega, L., Cantillo, V. & Arellana, J. (2019). Assessing the impact of major infrastructure projects on port choice decision: The Colombian case. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 120(1), 132-148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2018.12.021   DOI
36 Wagner, J. (2013). Exports, imports and firm survival: First evidence for manufacturing enterprises in Germany. Review of World Economics, 149(1), 113-130. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10290-012-0141-2   DOI
37 Merediz, I. & Bariviera, A. (2019). A bibliometric analysis of bitcoin scientific production. Research in International Business and Finance, 50(1), 294-305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2019.06.008   DOI
38 Muuls, M. (2015). Exporters, importers and credit constraints. Journal of International Economics, 95(2), 333-343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2014.12.003   DOI
39 Hang, H. T. & Adjouro, T. (2021). The Effects of Cross-Border ECommerce on International Trade and Economic Growth: A Case of China. International Journal of Economics and Finance, 13(12), 82-89 https://doi.org/10.5539/ijef.v13n12p82   DOI
40 Martinez, S., Lopez, D., & Ojeda, D. (2018). Comparative study of the ports of San Antonio and Buenaventura with a view to improving competitiveness: Case of Colombia. Point of View, 9(14), 1-27. https://doi.org/10.15765/pdv.v9i14.1181   DOI
41 Quevedo, M., Vasquez, L., Quevedo, J., & Pinzon, L. (2020). COVID-19 and its effects on international trade. Ecuador case. Science Domain, 6(3), 1006-1015. http://dx.doi.org/10.23857/dc.v6i3.1330   DOI
42 Ramos, S. B. & Veiga, H. (2013). Oil price asymmetric effects: Answering the puzzle in international stock markets. Energy Economics, 38(1), 136-145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2013.03.011   DOI
43 Rana, R., & Sharma, M. (2019). Dynamic causality testing for EKC hypothesis, pollution haven hypothesis and international trade in India. The Journal of International Trade and Economic Development, 28(3), 348-364. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638199.2018.1542451   DOI
44 Wang, Y., Wu, C. & Yang, L. (2013). Oil price shocks and stock market activities: Evidence from oil-importing and oilexporting countries. Journal of Comparative economics, 41(4), 1220-1239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2012.12.004   DOI
45 Lacka, E., Chan, H. K., & Wang, X. (2020). Technological advancements and B2B international trade: A bibliometric analysis and review of industrial marketing research. Industrial Marketing Management, 88(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2020.04.007   DOI
46 Mejia, C., Wu, M., Zhang, Y., & Kajikawa, Y. (2021). Exploring topics in bibliometric research through citation networks and semantic analysis. Frontiers In Research Metrics and Analytics, 6(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.3389/frma.2021.742311   DOI
47 Sadorsky, P. (2012). Energy consumption, output and trade in South America. Energy Economics, 34(2), 476-488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2011.12.008   DOI
48 Schroeder, T. C. & Tonsor, G. T. (2012). International cattle ID and traceability: Competitive implications for the US. Food Policy, 37(1), 31-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2011.10.005   DOI