Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.15722/jds.18.8.202008.35

Individual Employees' Service Failures and Customer Satisfaction with the Firm  

CHAE, Myoung-Jin (Department of Marketing and International Business, Lingnan University)
Publication Information
Journal of Distribution Science / v.18, no.8, 2020 , pp. 35-45 More about this Journal
Abstract
Purpose: Do close linkages among employees during service encounters always enhance customer satisfaction? Drawing on literature in social psychology, this research argues that under certain circumstances close linkages among employees undermine customer satisfaction. More specifically, this research explores a service failure context and shows that higher task interaction among employees during service encounters leads to higher perceived firm entitativity, resulting in an individual employee's service failure being detrimental to customer satisfaction with the firm. Data and research methodology: A series of experiments using scenarios across different service contexts was used in order to test hypotheses. Data was collected via Amazon Mechanical Turk and the models were tested using Hayes PROCESS. Results: The results show that interactions among employees during service result in 1) lower satisfaction with the firm and 2) lower revisit intentions in the future when there is a service failure by an individual employee. Following the main effects analysis, mediation analysis shows that the effect of employee interaction on customer satisfaction with the firm and revisit intention is mediated by perceived firm entitativity. Implications: By examining contexts where employee interaction may be detrimental to firms, this research provides novel insights on how to manage communications among service employees.
Keywords
Service Failure; Entitativity; Groupness; Customer Satisfaction; Employee Interaction;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 6  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Yzerbyt, V. Y., Rogier, A., & Fiske, S. T. (1998). Group entitativity and social attribution: On translating situational constraints into stereotypes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24(10), 1089-1103.   DOI
2 Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182.   DOI
3 Bendapudi, N., & Leone, R. P. (2002). Managing business-tobusiness customer relationships following key contact employee turnover in a vendor firm. Journal of Marketing, 66(2), 83-101.   DOI
4 Berry, L. L. (1995). Relationship marketing of services-growing interest, emerging perspectives. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 23(4), 236-245.   DOI
5 Bitner, M. J., Booms, B. H., & Mohr., L. A. (1994). Critical service encounters: The employee's viewpoint. Journal of Marketing, 58(4), 95-106.   DOI
6 Bitner, M. J., Booms, B. H., & Tetreault., M. S. (1990). The service encounter: Diagnosing favorable and unfavorable incidents. The Journal of Marketing, 54(1), 71-84.   DOI
7 Campbell, D. T. (1958). Common fate, similarity, and other indices of the status of aggregates of persons as social entities. Behavioral Science, 3(1), 14-25.   DOI
8 Castano, E., Sacchi, S., & Gries, P. H. (2003). The perception of the other in international relations: Evidence for the polarizing effect of entitativity. Political Psychology, 24(3), 449-468.   DOI
9 Crawford, M. T., Sherman, S. J., & Hamilton, D. L. (2002). Perceived entitativity, stereotype formation, and the interchangeability of group members. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(5), 1076-1094.   DOI
10 Crump, S. A., Hamilton, D. L., Sherman, S. J., Lickel, B., & Thakkar, V. (2010). Group entitativity and similarity: Their differing patterns in perceptions of groups. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40(7), 1212-1230.   DOI
11 Dasgupta, N., Banaji, M. R., & Abelson, R. P. (1999). Group entitativity and group perception: Associations between physical features and psychological judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(5), 991-1003.   DOI
12 Gelbrich, K. (2010). Anger, frustration, and helplessness after service failure: Coping strategies and effective informational support. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 38(5), 567-585.   DOI
13 Goodman, P. S., Fichman, M., Lerch, F. J., & Snyder, P. R. (1995). Customer-firm relationships, involvement, and customer satisfaction. Academy of Management Journal, 38(5), 1310-1324.   DOI
14 Griffin, M. A., Patterson, M. G., & West, M. A. (2001). Job satisfaction and teamwork: The role of supervisor support. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 22(5), 537-550.   DOI
15 Hanaysha, J., & Tahir, P. R. (2016). Examining the effects of employee empowerment, teamwork, and employee training on job satisfaction. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 219, 272-282.   DOI
16 Hayes, A. F. (2017). Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach. New York, NY: Guilford Publications.
17 Hess, R. L., Ganesan, S., & Klein, N. M. (2003). Service failure and recovery: The impact of relationship factors on customer satisfaction. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 31(2), 127-145.   DOI
18 Jiang, X. (2010). How to motivate people working in teams. International Journal of business and Management, 5(10), 223-229.
19 Johnson, A. L., & Queller, S. (2003). The mental representations of high and low entitativity groups. Social cognition, 21(2), 101-119.   DOI
20 Khoa, B. T., Nguyen, T. D., & Nguyen, V. T. T. (2020). Factors affecting customer relationship and the repurchase intention of designed fashion products. The Journal of Distribution Science, 18(2), 17-28.   DOI
21 Khuong, M. N., & Tien, B. D. (2013). Factors influencing employee loyalty directly and indirectly through job satisfaction-A study of banking sector in Ho Chi Minh City. International Journal of Current Research and Academic Review, 1(4), 81-95.
22 Kim, M., Hur, W. M., & Kim, B. S. (2019). The effect of frontline employees' experienced customer incivility on service performance. The Journal of Distribution Science, 17(8), 107-118.
23 Kim, Y. K. (2019). The Effects of Attractiveness of Service Employee's on Interpersonal Trust, Satisfaction and Loyalty. Journal of Industrial Distribution & Business, 10(10), 23-34.   DOI
24 Lickel, B., Hamilton, D. L., & Sherman, S. J. (2001). Elements of a lay theory of groups: Types of groups, relational styles, and the perception of group entitativity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5(2), 129-140.   DOI
25 Lickel, B., Hamilton, D. L., Wieczorkowska, G., Lewis, A., Sherman, S. J., & Uhles, A. N. (2000). Varieties of groups and the perception of group entitativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(2), 223-246.   DOI
26 Maxham III, J. G., & Netemeyer, R. G. (2002). A longitudinal study of complaining customers' evaluations of multiple service failures and recovery efforts. Journal of Marketing, 66(4), 57-71.   DOI
27 Maxham III, J. G., & Netemeyer, R. G. (2003). Firms reap what they sow: The effects of shared values and perceived organizational justice on customers' evaluations of complaint handling. Journal of Marketing, 67(1), 46-62.   DOI
28 McConnell, A. R., Sherman, S. J., & Hamilton, D. L. (1997). Target entitativity: Implications for information processing about individual and group targets. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(4), 750-762.   DOI
29 Meneses, R., Ortega, R., Navarro, J., & de Quijano, S. D. (2008). Criteria for assessing the level of group development (LGD) of work groups groupness, entitativity, and groupality as theoretical perspectives. Small Group Research, 39(4), 492-514.   DOI
30 Morewedge, C. K., Chandler, J. J., Smith, R., Schwarz, N., & Schooler, J. (2013). Lost in the crowd: Entitative group membership reduces mind attribution. Consciousness and Cognition, 22(4), 1195-1205.   DOI
31 Nelson, K., & Bowe, J. (2000). The effect of employee uniforms on employee satisfaction. Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly, 41(2), 86-95.   DOI
32 Newheiser, A. K., & Dovidio, J. F. (2015). High outgroup entitativity can inhibit intergroup retribution. British Journal of Social Psychology, 54(2), 341-358.   DOI
33 Oh, H. (2000). Diners' perceptions of quality, value, and satisfaction: A practical viewpoint. Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly, 41(3), 58-66.   DOI
34 Oliver, R. L., & Swan, J. E. (1989). Consumer perceptions of interpersonal equity and satisfaction in transactions: A field survey approach. Journal of Marketing, 53(2), 21-35.   DOI
35 Palmatier, R. W., Scheer, L. K., & Steenkamp, J. B. E. (2007). Customer loyalty to whom? Managing the benefits and risks of salesperson-owned loyalty. Journal of Marketing Research, 44(2), 185-199.   DOI
36 Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 879-891.   DOI
37 Roets, A., & Van Hiel, A. (2011). The role of need for closure in essentialist entitativity beliefs and prejudice: An epistemic needs approach to racial categorization. British Journal of Social Psychology, 50(1), 52-73.   DOI
38 Sherman, S. J., & Percy, E. J. (2010). Psychology of collective responsibility: When and why collective entities are likely to be held responsible for the misdeeds of individual members. Journal of Law and Policy, 19(1), 139-172.
39 Smith, R. W., Faro, D., & Burson, K. A. (2013). More for the many: The influence of entitativity on charitable giving. Journal of Consumer Research, 39(5), 961-976.   DOI
40 Spencer-Rodgers, J., Hamilton, D. K., & Sherman, S. J. (2007). The central role of entitativity in stereotypes of social categories and task groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(3), 369-388.   DOI
41 Spencer, S. J., Zanna, M. P., & Fong, G. T. (2005). Establishing a causal chain: Why experiments are often more effective than mediational analyses in examining psychological processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(6), 845-851.   DOI
42 Stenstrom, D. M., Lickel, B., Denson, T. F., & Miller, N. (2008). The roles of ingroup identification and outgroup entitativity in intergroup retribution. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34(11), 1570-1582.   DOI
43 Tu, Y. T., Yeh, R., Chuang, N. K., Chen, T., & Hu, S. M. (2011). Effects of Employees' uniform on company image and employees' self-perceptions and customers' perceptions. Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research, 16(6), 635-648.   DOI
44 Wang, C., Hoegg, J., & Dahl, D. W. (2018). The impact of a sales team's perceived entitativity on customer satisfaction. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 46(2), 190-211.   DOI
45 Yzerbyt, V., Castano, E., Leyens, J. P., & Paladino, M. P. (2000). The primacy of the ingroup: The interplay of entitativity and identification. European Review of Social Psychology, 11(1), 257-295.   DOI