1 |
Govindarajulu, N. S., Bringsjord, S., Ghosh, R., & Sarathy, V. (2019). Toward the engineering of virtuous machines. Proceedings of the 2019 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society, Honolulu, HI. January 27-28.
|
2 |
Kuipers, B. (2018). How can we trust a robot? Communications of the ACM, 61(3), 86-95.
DOI
|
3 |
Malle, B. F., Scheutz, M., & Austerweil, J. L. (2017). Networks of social and moral norms in human and robot agents. In M. I. A. Ferreira, J. S. Sequeira, O. M. Tokhi, E. Kadar & G. S. Virk (Eds.), A world with robots: International conference on robot ethics (pp. 3-17). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
|
4 |
Nuyen, A. T. (2007). Confucian ethics as role-based ethics. International Philosophical Quarterly, 47(3), 315-328.
DOI
|
5 |
Pettigrove, G. (2020). Characters and roles. In T. Dare, & C. Swanton (Eds.), Perspectives in role ethics: Virtues, reasons, and obligation (pp. 11-30). New York, NY: Routledge.
|
6 |
Puett, M., & Gross-Loh, C. (2016). The path: What Chinese philosophers can teach us about the good life. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
|
7 |
Rosemont, H. (2015). Against individualism: A Confucian rethinking of the foundations of morality, politics, family, and religion. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
|
8 |
Ames, R. (2021). Human becomings: Theorizing persons for Confucian role ethics. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
|
9 |
Bell, D. A. (2018). Roles, community, and morality: Comment on Confucian Role Ethics. In J. Behuniak (Ed.), Appreciating the Chinese difference: Engaging Roger T. Ames on methods, issues, and roles (pp. 203-212). Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
|
10 |
Cappuccio, M. L., Sandoval, E. B., Mubin, O., Obaid, M., & Velonaki, M. (2021). Can robots make us better humans?: Virtuous robotics and the good life with artificial agents. International Journal of Social Robotics, 7-22.
DOI
|
11 |
Ames, R., & Rosemont, H. (2011). Were the early Confucian virtuous? In C. Fraser, D. Robins & T. O'Leary (Eds.), Ethics in early China: An anthology (pp. 17-39). Hong Kong, China: Hong Kong University Press.
|
12 |
Hagen, K. (2010). The propriety of Confucius: A sense-of-ritual. Asian Philosophy, 20(1), 1-25.
DOI
|
13 |
Angle, S. (2018). Building bridges to distinct shores: Pragmatic problems with Confucian role ethics. In J. Behuniak (Ed.), Appreciating the Chinese difference: Engaging Roger T. Ames on methods, issues, and roles (pp. 159-182). Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
|
14 |
Dare, T. (2009). The counsel of rogues? A defence of the standard conception of the lawyer's role. Farnham, UK: Ashgate.
|
15 |
Dare, T., & Swanton, C. (2020). Introduction. In T. Dare, & C. Swanton (Eds.), Perspectives in role ethics: Virtues, reasons, and obligation (pp. 1-7). New York, NY: Routledge.
|
16 |
Higgins, K. M. (2018). Performance in Confucian role ethics. In J. Behuniak (Ed.), Appreciating the Chinese difference: Engaging Roger T. Ames on methods, issues, and roles (pp. 213-228). Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
|
17 |
Kasenberg, D., Arnold, T., & Scheutz, M. (2018). Norms, rewards, and the intentional stance: Comparing machine learning approaches to ethical training. Proceedings of 2018 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society, New Orleans, LA. February 2-3.
|
18 |
Kasenberg, D., Roque, A., Thielstrom, R., Chita-Tegmark, M., & Scheutz, M. (2019). Generating justifications for norm-related agent decisions. Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Natural Language Generation, Tokyo, Japan. October 29 - November 1.
|
19 |
Korsgaard, C. M. (1993). The reasons we can share: An attack on the distinction between agent- relative and agent neutral values. Social Philosophy and Policy, 10(1), 24-51.
DOI
|
20 |
Korsgaard, C. (2009). Self-constitution: Agency, identity and integrity. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
|
21 |
Rosemont, H., & Ames, R. (2016). Confucian role ethics: A moral vision for the 21st century? Taipei, Taiwan: National Taiwan University Press.
|
22 |
Langley, P. (2019). Explainable, normative, and justified agency. Proceedings of the 33rd AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Honolulu, HI. January 27 - February 1.
|
23 |
Cottine, C. (2020). That's what friends are for: A Confucian perspective on the moral significance of friendship. In T. Dare, & C. Swanton (Eds.), Perspectives in role ethics: Virtues, reasons, and obligation (pp. 123-142). New York, NY: Routledge.
|
24 |
Luban, D. (1988). Lawyers and justice: An ethical study. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
|
25 |
Sarathy, V., Scheutz, M., & Malle, B. (2017). Learning behavioral norms in uncertain and changing contexts. Proceedings of the 8th IEEE International Conference on Cognitive Infocommunications (CogInfoCom), Debrecen, Hungry. September 11-14.
|
26 |
Scheutz, M., Malle, B., & Briggs, G. (2015). Towards morally sensitive action selection for autonomous social robots. Proceedings of the 24th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN), Kobe, Japan. August 31 - September 4.
|
27 |
Bringsjord, S., Arkoudas, K., & Bello, P. (2006). Toward a general logicist methodology for engineering ethically correct robots. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 21(4), 38-44.
DOI
|
28 |
Seddon, K. H. (n.d.). Epictetus. International encyclopedia of philosophy. https://www.iep.utm.edu/epictetu/. Accessed 12 April 2019.
|
29 |
Williams, T., Zhu, Q., Wen, R., & de Visser, E. (2020). The Confucian matador: Three defenses against the mechanical bull. Proceedings of HRI '20: ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, Cambridge, UK. March 23-26.
|
30 |
Ames, R. T. (2011). Confucian role ethics: A vocabulary. Hong Kong, China: Chinese University Press.
|
31 |
Coeckelbergh, M. (2010). Robot rights? Towards a social-relational justification of moral consideration. Ethics and Information Technology, 12, 209-221.
DOI
|
32 |
Wang, K. (2017). Xunzi's virtue ethics of rationality and the issue of emotions. In X. Yao (Ed.), Reconceptualizing Confucian philosophy in the 21st century (pp. 35-42). Singapore: Springer.
|
33 |
Dare, T. (2020). Roles all the way down. In T. Dare, & C. Swanton (Eds.), Perspectives in role ethics: Virtues, reasons, and obligations (pp. 31-44). New York: Routledge.
|
34 |
Johnson, B. E. (2014). The role ethics of Epictetus: Stoicism in ordinary life. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
|
35 |
Kim, B., Wen, R., Zhu, Q., Williams, T., & Phillips, E. (2021). Robots as moral advisors: The effects of deontological, virtue, and Confucian ethics on encouraging honest behavior. Proceedings of HRI '21: ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (virtual). March 8-11.
|
36 |
Swanton, C. (2020). Expertise and virtue in role ethics. In T. Dare & C. Swanton (Eds.), Perspectives in role ethics: Virtues, reasons, and obligation (pp. 45-71). New York, NY: Routledge.
|
37 |
Chan, J. (2008). Territorial boundaries and Confucianism. In D. A. Bell (Ed.), Confucian political ethics (pp. 61-84). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
|
38 |
Ess, C. (2006). Ethical pluralism and global information ethics. Ethics and Information Technology, 8(4), 215-226.
DOI
|
39 |
Ni, P. (2018). Does Confucianism need a metaphysical theory of human nature?: Reflections on Ames-Rosemont role ethics. In J. Behuniak (Ed.), Appreciating the Chinese difference: Engaging Roger T. Ames on methods, issues, and roles (pp. 183-202). Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
|
40 |
Vallor, S. (2016). Technology and the virtues: A philosophical guide to a future worth wanting. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
|
41 |
Weinstock, D. M. (1998). Moral pluralism. In E. Craig (Ed.), Routledge encyclopedia of philosophy. Routledge. Retrieved January 5, 2021, from https://www.rep.routledge.com/articles/thematic/moral-pluralism/v-1
|
42 |
Zhu, Q., Williams, T., Jackson, B., & Wen, R. (2020). Blame-laden moral rebukes and the morally competent robot: A Confucian ethical perspective. Science and Engineering Ethics, 26(5), 2511-2526.
DOI
|
43 |
Zhu, Q. (2018). Confucian ethics, ethical leadership, and engineering ethics education. International Journal of Ethics Education, 3(2), 169-179.
DOI
|