1 |
Kottamasu SR, Kuhns LR, Stringer DA. Pediatric musculoskeletal computed radiography. Pediat Radiol 1997; 27: 563-575.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
2 |
Marolf A, Blaik M, Ackerman N, Watson E, Gibson N, Thompson M. Comparison of computed radiography and conventional radiography in detection of small volume pneumoperitoneum. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2008; 49: 227-232.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
3 |
William RW. Acquisition hardware for digital imaging. Vet Radiol Ultraound 2008; 49: S2-S8.
DOI
|
4 |
Fajardo LL, Hillman BJ, Hunter TB, Claypool HR, Westerman BR, Mockbee B. Excretory urography using computed radiography. Radiology 1987; 162: 345-51.
DOI
|
5 |
Weatherburn GC, Ridout D, Strickland NH, Robins P, Glastonbury CM, Curati W, Harvey C, Shadbolt C. A comparison of conventional film, CR hard copy and PACS soft copy images of the chest: analyses of ROC curves and inter-observer agreement. Eur J Roentgenol 1997; 168: 539-542.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
6 |
Nakano Y, Togashi K, Nishimura K, Itoh K, Fujisawa I, Asato R, Adachi H, Itoh H, Torizuka K. Stomach and duodenum: radiographic magnification using computed radiography (CR). Radiology 1986; 160: 383-387.
DOI
|
7 |
Raymond K, Henley, David A Hager, Norman Ackerman. A comparison of two-dimensional ultrasonography and radiography for the detection of small amounts of free peritoneal fluid in the dog. Vet Radiol Ultraound 1989: 121-124.
|
8 |
Swee RB, Gray JE, Beabout JW, et al. Screen-film vs. computed radiography imaging of the hand: a direct comparison. Am J Roentgenol 1997; 168:539-542.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
9 |
Matton JS, Smith C. Breakthroughs in radiography: computed radiography. Compend Contin Educ Pract Vet 2004; 26: 58-66.
|
10 |
Murphy MD. Computed radiography in musculoskeletal imaging. Semin Roentgenol 1997; 32: 64-76.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
11 |
Brettle DS, Workman A, Ellwood RP, Launders JH, Horner K, Davies RM. The imaging performance of a storage phosphor system for dental radiography. Br J Radiol 1996; 69: 256-261.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
12 |
Wilson AJ, Mann FA, West OC, McEnery KW, Murphy WA Jr. Evaluation of the injured cervical spine: comparison of conventional and storage phosphor radiography with a hybrid cassette. Radiology 1994; 193: 419-22.
DOI
|
13 |
Garmer M, Hennigs SP, Jäger HJ, Schrick F, van de Loo T, Jacobs A, Hanusch A, Christmann A, Mathias K. Digital radiography versus conventional radiography in chest imaging: diagnostic performance of a large-area silicon flat-panel detector in a clinical CT-controlled study. Am J Roentgenol 2000; 175:75-80.
DOI
ScienceOn
|