Browse > Article

Prevalence-based Interpretation of Predictive Values of Diagnostic Tests: An Example for Detection of Canine Heartworm Infection  

Park, Choi-Kyu (School of Veterinary Medicine and Institute of Veterinary Science, Kangwon National University)
Pak, Son-Il (National Veterinary Research and Quarantine Service)
Publication Information
Journal of Veterinary Clinics / v.26, no.2, 2009 , pp. 130-133 More about this Journal
Abstract
The use of screening tests as part of a diagnostic work-up is common in domestic canine practice, but understanding of the diagnostic test characteristics and factors affecting diagnostic accuracy is not clear among clinicians. This article was aimed to provide clinicians with a better understanding on the selection of test kits and with a proper interpretation of test results using an example from heartworm(Dirofilaria immitis) studies. From the literatures, diagnostic accuracy varied depending on the kits: percent average sensitivity and specificity of ELISA antigen-detecting kits were DiroChek(Synbiotics, USA) 78.1 and 95.2, SNAP(IDEXX, USA) 66.3 and 98.1, and Solo Step(Heska, Switzerland) 69.5 and 97.5, respectively, while the values for three hematological methods(Modified Knott's, direct smear and capillary tube) ranged from 38.4 to 81.8% and from 96.9 to 100%, respectively. Furthermore, it was also reported that the prevalence of heartworm disease in domestic dog populations varied depending on the regions studied: 2.5-22.8% for microfilarial test and 2.2-66.3% by ELISA. The values of predictive values for positive(PPV) and negative(NPV) provide useful information to clinicians on the probability of heartworm infection, but the PPV and NPV are greatly dependent on the heartworm prevalence. This suggests that PPV or NPV values of a test should be interpreted carefully in different clinical settings. Practical methods on the interpretation taking into account heartworm prevalence were discussed.
Keywords
heartworm; predictive value; prevalence; dog;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
Times Cited By SCOPUS : 0
연도 인용수 순위
1 Atkins CE. Comparison of results of three commercial heartworm antigen test kits in dogs with low heartworm burdens. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2003; 222: 1221-1223   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
2 Gardner IA, Greiner M. Receiver-operating characteristic curves and likelihood ratios: improvements over traditional methods for the evaluation and application of veterinary clinical pathology tests. Vet Clin Path 2006; 35: 8-17   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Bland A, McTier T, Freeman KP et al. Evaluation of the ICTGOLD heartworm antigen test kit: In: Proceedings Heartworm Symposium, Batavia: Am Heartworm Soc 1995; 135-140
4 Chu K. An introduction to sensitivity, specificity, predictive values and likelihood ratios. Emerg Med 1999; 11: 175-181   DOI
5 Courtney CH, Zeng QY, Tonelli Q. Sensitivity and specificity of the CITE heartworm test and a comparison with the DiroCHEK heartworm antigen test. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1990; 26: 623-628
6 Elstein AS, Schwartz A. Clinical problem solving and diagnostic decision making: selective review of the cognitive literature. BMJ 2002; 324: 729-732   DOI   PUBMED
7 Greenhalgh T. How to read a paper: papers that report diagnostic or screening tests. BMJ 1997; 315: 540-543   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
8 Kim ET, Pak SI. Use of likelihood ratios in evidence-based clinical decision making. J Vet Clin 2008; 25: 146-151
9 Wang LC. Canine filarial infections in north Taiwan. Acta Trop 1997; 68: 115-120   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
10 Brunner CJ, Hendrix CM, Blagburn BL, Hanrahan LA. Comparison of serologic tests for detection of antigen in canine heartworm infections. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1988; 192: 1423-1427   PUBMED
11 Schultz KS, Cook JL, Kapatkin AS, Brown DC. Evidencebased surgery: time for change. Vet Surg 2006; 35: 697-699   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Atwell RB, Sheridan AB, Baldock FC. An evaluation of the DiroCHEK test for detection of Dirofilaria immitis antigen in dogs. Aust Vet J 1988; 65: 161-162   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Collins MT, Interpretation of a commercial bovine paratuberculosis enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay by using likelihood ratios, Clin Diagn Lab Immunol 2002; 9: 1367–1371   DOI   PUBMED
14 Guyatt G, Sackett D, Haynes R. Evaluating diagnostic tests. In: Clinical epidemiology: how to do clinical practice research. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2006; 273-322
15 Hoover JP, Campbell GA, Fox JC, Claypool PL, Mullins SB. Comparison of eight diagnostic bllod tests for heartworm infection in dogs. Canine Pract 1996; 21: 11-19
16 Fosgate GT, Adesiyun AA, Hird DW, Hietala SK. Likelihood ratio estimation without a gold standard: A case study evaluating a brucellosis c-ELISA in cattle and water buffalo of Trinidad. Prev Vet Med 2006; 75: 189–205   DOI   ScienceOn
17 Sackett DL, Haynes RB. Evidence base of clinical diagnosis: the architecture of diagnostic research. BMJ 2002; 324: 539-541   DOI   PUBMED
18 Steurer J, Fischer JF, Bachmann LM, Koller M, ter Riet G. Communicating accuracy of tests to general practitioners: a controlled study. BMJ 2002; 324: 824-826   DOI   ScienceOn
19 Courtney CH, Zeng Q-Y. Sensitivity and specificity of two heartworm antigen tests. Canine Pract 1995; 20: 15-17
20 Giard RWM, Hermans J. The diagnostic information of tests for the detection of cancer: the usefulness of the likelihood ratio concept. Eur J Cancer 1996; 32A: 2042–2048   DOI   ScienceOn
21 Chang PJ. Bayesian analysis revisited: a radiologist's survival guide. Am J Roentgenol 1988; 152: 721-727   DOI   ScienceOn
22 Christensen J, Gardner IA. Herd-level interpretation of test results for epidemiologic studies of animal diseases. Prev Vet Med 2000; 45: 83-106   DOI   ScienceOn
23 Courtney CH, Zeng QY. Comparison of heartworm antigen test kit performance in dogs having low heartworm burdens. Vet Parasitol 2001; 96: 317-322   DOI   ScienceOn
24 Martini M, Capelli G, Pogalyen G, Bertotti F, Turilli C. The validity of some haematological and ELISA methods for the diagnosis of canine heartworm disease. Vet Res Commun 1996; 20: 331-339   DOI   ScienceOn
25 Bedenice D. Evidence-based medicine in equine critical care. Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract 2007; 23: 293-316   DOI   ScienceOn
26 Greiner M, Gardner IA. Application of diagnostic tests in veterinary epidemiologic studies. Prev Vet Med 2000; 45: 43-59   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
27 Peterson ME. Diagnosis of hyperadrenocorticism in dogs. Clin Tech Small Anim Pract 2007; 22: 2-11   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
28 Gardner IA, Blanchard PC. Interpretation of laboratory results. In: Disease of swine. 9th ed. Iowa: Blackwell Publishing, 2006; 219-239