1 |
Courtney CH, Zeng QY, Bean ES. Sensitivity and specificity of the Diro- heartworm antigen test for immunodiagnosis of canine dirofilariasis and a comparison with other immunodiagnostic tests. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1988; 24: 27-32
|
2 |
Johnson WO, Gastwirth JL. Bayesian inference for medical screening tests: approximations useful for the analysis of acquired immune deficiency syndrome. J Roy Statist Soc Ser B 1991; 53: 427-439
|
3 |
Courtney CH, Zeng QY. Comparison of two antigen tests and the modified Knott's test for the detection of canine heartworm at different worm burdens. Canine Pract 1993; 18: 5-7
|
4 |
Dempster A, Laird N, Rubin D. Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm. J Roy Stat Soc Ser B 1977; 39: 1-38
|
5 |
Ely ML, Courtney CH. Sensitivity and specificity of FilarochekiR) heartworm antigen test and Dirotect(R) heartworm antibody test for immunodiagnosis of canine filariasi. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1987; 23: 367-371
|
6 |
Faraone SV, Tsuang MT. Measuring diagnostic accuracy in the absence of a 'gold standard'. Am J Psychiatry 1994; 151: 650-657
DOI
|
7 |
Pak SI, Kim D, Salman M. Estimation of paratuberculosis prevalence in dairy cattle in a province of Korea using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay: application of Bayesian approach. J Vet Sci 2003; 4: 51-56
|
8 |
Georgiadis MP, Gardner lA, Hedrick RP. Field evaluation of sensitivity and specificity of a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for detection of Nucleospora salmonis in rainbow trout. J Aquat Anim Health 1998; 10: 372-380
DOI
ScienceOn
|
9 |
Johnson WO, Gastwirth JL, Pearson LM. Screening without a gold standard: the Hui-Walter paradigm revisited. Am J Epidemiol 2001; 153: 921-924
DOI
ScienceOn
|
10 |
Mar P, Yang I, Chang G, Fei AC. Specific polymerase chain reaction for differential diagnosis of Dirofilaria immitis and Dipetaloma reconditum using primers derived from internal transcribed spacer region 2 (ITS2). Vet Parasitol 2002; 106: 243-252
DOI
ScienceOn
|
11 |
Rosa A, Ribicich M, Betti A, Kistermann JC, Cardillo N, Basso N, Hallu R. Prevalence of canine dirofilariasis in the city of Buenos Aires and its outskirts (Argentina). Vet Parasitol 2002; 109: 261-264
DOI
ScienceOn
|
12 |
Vacek PM. The effect of conditional dependence on the evaluation of diagnostic tests. Biometrics 1985; 41: 959-968
DOI
ScienceOn
|
13 |
Watts KJ, Courtney CH, Reddy GR. Development of a PCR-based test for the sensitive and specific detection of the dog heartworm, Dirofilaria immitis, in its mosquito intermediate host. Mol Cell Probes 1999; 14: 425-430
|
14 |
Smith RD. Veterinary clinical epidemiology: a problem-oriented approach. 2nd ed. CRC Press: Boca Raton, 1995: 31-52
|
15 |
Favia G, Lanfrancotti A, Torre AD, Cancrini G, Coluzzi M. Polymerase chain reaction: identification of Dirofilaria repens and Dirofilaria immitis. Parasitol 1996; 113: 567-571
DOI
|
16 |
Brunner CJ, Hendrix CM, Blagburn BL, Hanrahan LA. Comparison of serologic tests for detection of antigen in canine heartwonn infections. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1988; 192: 14231427
|
17 |
Martin TE, Collins GH. Prevalence of Dirofilaria immitis and Dipetalonema reconditum in greyhounds. Aust Vet J 1985; 62: 159-163
DOI
ScienceOn
|
18 |
Choi BCK. Causal modeling to estimate sensitivity and specificity of a test when prevalence changes. Epidemiology 1997; 8: 80-86
DOI
ScienceOn
|
19 |
Gardner lA, Stryhn H, Lind P, Collins MT. Conditional dependence between tests affects the diagnosis and surveillance of animal diseases. Prev Vet Med 2000; 45: 107-122
DOI
ScienceOn
|
20 |
Hui SL, Walter SO. Estimating the error rates of diagnostic tests. Biometrics 1980; 36: 167-171
DOI
ScienceOn
|
21 |
Johnson WO, Gastwirth JL. Dual group screening. J Statist Plann Inference 2000; 83: 449-473
DOI
ScienceOn
|
22 |
Boelaert M, Aoun K, Liinev J, Goetghebeur E, van der Stuyft P. The potential of latent class analysis in diagnostic test validation for canine Leishmania infantum infection. Epidemiol Infect 1999; 123: 499-506
DOI
ScienceOn
|
23 |
Mendoza-Blanco JTX, Lyengar S. Bayesian inference on prevalence using a missing-data approach with simulation-based techniques: applications to HIV screening. Stat Med 1996; 15: 2161-2176
DOI
ScienceOn
|
24 |
Walter SO, Irwig LM. Estimation of test error rates, disease prevalence and relative risk from misclassified data: a review. J Clin Epidemiol 1988; 41; 923-937
DOI
ScienceOn
|
25 |
Song KH, Lee SE, Hayasaki M, Shiramizu K, Kim DH, Cho KW. Seroprevalence of canine dirofilariasis in South Korea. Vet Parasitol 2003; 114: 231-236
DOI
ScienceOn
|
26 |
Joseph L, Gyorkos TW, Coupal L. Bayesian estimation of disease prevalence and the parameters of diagnostic tests in the absence of a gold standard. Am J Epidemiol 1995; 141: 263-272
DOI
|
27 |
Tanner MA. Tools for statistical inference. In: Methods for the exploration of posterior distributions and likelihood functions. 3rd ed. Springer, New York, 1996: 78-79
|
28 |
Enoe C, Georgiadis MP, Johnson WO. Estimation of sensitivity and specificity of diagnostic tests and disease prevalence when the true disease state is unknown. Prev Vet Med 2000; 45: 61-81
DOI
ScienceOn
|
29 |
Courtney CH, Zeng QY. Comparison of heartworm antigen test kit performance in dogs having low heartworm burdens. Vet Parasitol 2001; 96: 317-322
DOI
ScienceOn
|
30 |
Alonzo TA, Pepe MS. Using a combination of reference tests to assess the accuracy of a new diagnostic test. Stat Med 1999; 18: 2987-3003
DOI
ScienceOn
|
31 |
Valenstein, P. N. Evaluating diagnostic tests with imperfect standards. Am J Clin Pathol 1990, 93: 252-258
DOI
|
32 |
Walter SO, Frommer DG, Cook RJ. The estimation of sensitivity and specificity in colorectal cancer screening methods. Cancer Detect Prev 1991; 15: 465-469
|